Evaluation and comparative analysis of Waqf documents based on Shafi'i and Imami jurisprudence standards

One of the most important prerequisites for public participation in investment and financing projects (in this research, endowment bonds), is to provide information needs and pay attention to different jurisprudential views in the country. Therefore, in this research, the mentioned papers are examined based on the standards of Shafi'i and Imami jurisprudence in order to clarify and resolve its legal ambiguities and doubts.

The main approach in this research is a comparative approach. In order to analyze and issue jurisprudence in Imami jurisprudence, the method of document analysis (documents and approvals of the Jurisprudence Committee of the Stock Exchange Organization) has been used, and in connection with Sunni jurisprudence (Shafi'i jurisprudence), in-depth interview and focus group methods have been used, a statistical sample The aforementioned include 8 experts of Shafi'i jurisprudence.

The findings of the research showed that the commonality of views in the two jurisprudence institutions is very high, and this can be a sign of increasing the participation of Sunnis in endowment bonds and other Islamic securities issued in Iran.

Originality / Value: 

Considering that the results of the research resolved the jurisprudential ambiguities related to the endowment documents, it is a very positive step for the development of this tool, and surely, with the wide dissemination of the above results, we will witness more and more participation of Sunnis in Iran in similar projects at the level We will be the country and eventually a very good synergy will happen in this area.