A survey on Hadiths about reproaching the jurisprudents (Islamic scholars) at the end of Time

False claimants of Mahdism have always derogated more valuable issues in the religion, which hinder their activities more than the others. The essential and high position of ˈUlamās (Islamic scholars), as one of the important issues, is one of the false claimants’ priorities and they always seek to destroy it; because the deviants know that the true scholars are like a big obstacle to their way hence, they consider the only way to win is to pass this obstacle facing. Also, they believe that the most effective way to destroy the status of the scholars is to use religious means, so they seek to destroy or weaken this position by citing some Hadiths. After clarifying the sayings of the Hadiths about the importance of referring to the scholars, this article by using a descriptive-analytical method attempts to examine and criticize the arguments of the false claimants in condemning ˈUlamās (Islamic scholars) of the end of Time; and finally, this article clarifies the various scopes of this issue by stating the criteria for distinguishing the divine scholars from the non-divine ones. By studying and forming an Islamic narrative collection in this field, it becomes clear that the Hadiths in this field are divided into three categories in terms of meaning: explicit, non-explicit, and unrelated narrations. According to this survey, it becomes clear that firstly, many of these narrations are weak in terms of documentation; secondly, they are often not found in the old and earlier Hadith books; thirdly, in terms of content, the Hadiths do not imply what those claimers say; and fourthly, false claimants have in some cases intersected the Hadiths, and in some cases, they have gone wrong due to an incorrect understanding of the Hadith.