An Analysis of the domain and proceedings rules governing the article 23 of the amended statute of 4/11/2018 on checks.

The article is connected with various regulations not mentioned in the code, but only inferred from the legislator`s prospective, i.e the writ of execution is a binding non-contradictional administrative writ (actes d`administration judiciare) the competent court for issuance of which being the court competent to hear the main dispute rising from the check based on the Civil Procedure Code of 2000. But, if the dispute is of a criminal essence, the criminal court is competent for issuance of the writ. Based on the code, the legislator has limited the holder`s rights; The holder cannot claim late payment penalty and court expenses for the enforcement. Also, the execution writ is issued against the drawer and the account owner not the guarantor and indorser. Moreover, though the writ cannot be issued for conditional and guarantied checks as well as checks covered by article 14 of the code, non-issuance of the writ is not limited to these cases; the court can refrain from issuance in other instances too.