Pathology of defense equipment standardization processIn a military-police organization
This research was conducted with the aim of identifying the harms of the defense equipment standardization process in a military-police organization in 1401 and seeks to provide implementation solutions to eliminate the identified harms.
This research is applied and mixed in terms of the nature of the data. In the qualitative phase, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts familiar with the standardization process in the number of 11people and until reaching theoretical saturation, and using thematic analysis method with the help of MAXQDA4 software. Components and indicators were identified. In the quantitative phase, using the importance-performance analysis method, damages were evaluated and prioritized. The statistical population of this research is the number of 22experts and the statistical sample of the research is in the quantitative phase in the form of full enumeration.
Based on the collected information, 13 components and 81 indicators (damages) were identified for the standardization process of the organization's ready defense items and support. The lack of training of expert and expert human resources, weakness in technical attachments and not valuing human resources were ranked first to third, and the negative impact of macro policies on testing equipment was ranked last.
According to the analysis, 25 injuries are in the first quarter (concentration) and need to be addressed immediately and the organization should spend most of its resources and energy on improving them. 12 injuries have been identified in the second quarter (maintaining the status quo). This situation can be maintained to avoid wasting resources. 16 damages have occurred in the area of consideration (third quarter) and these indicators are not of great importance for the organization, it can be the next priority of the organization, but it is necessary to reduce the level of damage during a short-term program and by spending the least amount of resources, or kept at least The remaining 28cases are located in the condescension area (fourth quarter), which is not part of the organization's priority, and dealing with these damages will cause a waste of resources.
-
Identifying and Investigating the Effect of Dynamic Operational and Strategic Capabilities on the Competitiveness of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the automotive Industry with a Mixed-Exploratory Approach
Mohammadtaghi Esmaili, Amirali Foukerdi *, Mohammadmahdi Mohtadi
Journal of Logistics Thought Scientific Publication, -
Presenting a model for improving the resilience of jihadi groups
Vahid Hasanpour *, Mohammadmahdi Mohtadi, Gholamhossein Nikookar
Journal of Basij Strategic Studies, -
Qualitative Analysis of the Risk of CNC milling Machine Using the Approach of Failure Mode Analysis and Phase Effects
Hojat Adami *, Abbas Raad, Mohammadmahdi Mohtadi, Yaaser Ghasemi Nejhad
Journal of Logistics Thought Scientific Publication, -
Identification and ranking of effective key criteria in supply chain resilience (case study: Isar Support Company)
Jaber Sepehri Kia *, MohammadMahdi Mohtadi, Yaser Ghasemi Nejhad
Journal of Logistics Thought Scientific Publication,