Critique of political interpretations of the Qur'an in the field of application of the rules of semantics

The political interpretation of the Qur'an, due to its political nature and relation to power, has caused more extensive damage (than other types of interpretations). Part of the harmful context is related to the misuse or neglect of the rules of semantics.  This problem raises the question of whether the vulnerability of political perceptions in the application of the rules of semantics can be proved. Proving vulnerability provided the motivation to seek to make arrangements to provide credible political insights. The present study, which is organized by descriptive and analytical methods, emphasizes the assumption that political perceptions have been damaged in the application of the rules of semantics or disregard for the rules.  Reporting objective examples of these injuries proves the realization of vulnerability in practice, and its achievement proves the vulnerability of impressions in four important areas of semantic rules (examples of rules of “Qaedeh Etnab”; permitted in documents; “Hasr wa Qasr, Fasl waw asl”); Provides solutions to repair injuries and provide political insights