Criticism of contrastive structure in Moran's treatise on vocabulary

The comparative system has always been used in literature and religion, both at the level of words and at the level of meaning, in order to teach with oratory and other tools. The frequency of such a structure in education-based literature is drawn to the audience in the context of persuasion, warning, encouragement, warning and evangelism. In Persian literature, mysticism is one of the important platforms for the use of this language tool. Sheikh Shahab-al-Din Suhrevardi (549-587 AH), in the treatise on the vocabulary of Moran, mystical thoughts and what the seeker needs in the course of mysticism, using the tool of contrast and also in the literary form of fable. And the parable is explained. Ants, turtle, nightingale, jinn, human, bat, chameleon, hooded, canvas and peacock are the most important actors of these traditions. The expressive tool used in this work is debate and conversation. This research has analyzed the connection of active and non-active elements with the content after examining the 12-fold structure of Moran's vocabulary narrative with analytical-descriptive method. The result of the work shows that although there is no structural link between the twelve narratives presented in the treatise, there is a thematic link and content connection between these structures. The relationship between human potential and perfection in the form of the allegory of the sun and the moon is the subject of Sheikh Eshraq's focus in this treatise, which has been objectified in the rhetorical and not the narrative structure of twelve narrations.