Social education is an important arena of new juridical issues which need to be discussed from a jurisprudential perspective. The juridical social rules play a special role in enabling the jurisprudence to address new issues. These principles are authentic documents which prove juridical rules. For this reason, analyzing, forming and introducing juridical principles, especially with a view to the effect of time and space in Ijtihad to help juridical deduction, is a jurisprudential necessity. This study seeks to examine the juridical ruling concerning social education based on a system originating in jurisprudential principles according to customary jurisprudential method. Amongst the evidences, there are also social juridical principles, in addition to individual juridical principles. According to the purport of the said general principles, social responsibility in general and in respect of social education within the framework of primary governmental rules, is the duty of the government, family, scholars and the society at large.

Since the formation of early societies، the process of teaching and learning between the teacher and student has created reciprocal rights; hence، it was the observing 0f such rights that led to the perfection of this process. This issue، also، has been highly taken into consideration in Islamic and، therefore، many books are written based on the various verses and tradition in this regard. This current study aims to explain the rules of Islamic law on the rights of teachers and students. The method applied is of a descriptive one. It should be noted that most of these writings have been made on the basis of rights and obligations of the teacher and student from ethical perspective، while the inclusion of Islamic jurisprudence has been ignored. However، the research findings refer to these rights from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence، while considering the seventeen jurisprudence rules.

Family jurisprudence rules are a set of rules that either form the basis of certain family law rules and regulations, or have a direct bearing on these rules. Family jurisprudence rules fall under two categories, general and specific. The term ‘general rules’ signifies those rules that apply not only in family law, but also in other daily affairs (mu’âmalât) and religious practices (ebâdât), such as the principles of ‘no harm’ (lâ dharar) and ‘no malicious damage’ (lâ haraj), and prerequisite /proviso. On the other hand, rules such as fostering and farâsh (marriage/intercourse), no harm and prerequisition (proviso) are merely used in family law and are considered specific to family law. This paper presents the most important general and specific rules and approaches and their applicability in Iranian family law. Some family law provisions such as ‘the right to revert’ (ruju’) and ‘divorce’ (itlâq baid min akhz bil sâq) fall under family jurisprudential law. The compilation of jurisprudential rules and regulations and the identification of their application make possible the constitution of judicial procedures in cases that lack letters of statute.

One of the recurrent issues within Islamic government is the resolution of international conflicts via negotiations. Explanation of extra-religious negotiations'' scope and commitment and adherence to that based on jurisprudence's rules is one of the issues that is rarely researched. The objective of this study is to analyze jurisprudence upstream rules on extra-religious negotiations by relying on Imam Khomeini's duty-oriented perspective and using analytical-descriptive method. Extra-religious negotiation is a necessary primary concept, not a secondary emergency one. Jurisprudence upstream rules include denial of dominance and fitness of behavior rules, which are considered as the consequences of active, not passive negotiations. Active negotiations are rooted in Imam khomeini's duty-oriented perspectives and his lectures. He believed that religious provisions always hold, even if they contradict each other. Therefore, non-Muslim governments can't impose sanctions on Islamic governments within some proper situations. In addition, this study suggests that we should employ some flexible tactics for negotiations within critical circumstances.

There are a lot of similarities between some common-law rules and Islamic jurisprudence. The survey of these rules in the light of Islamic jurisprudence, reveals the relationship between the two systems and shows that the emergence of these rules is the result of impact of common-law from Islamic jurisprudence rules. In this study, the historical circumstances and backgrounds of this influence and its scope in various issues investigated.

Support for the victim is the main pillar of the supportive victimology approach. This approach in Iran's legal system has also been taken into consideration through friendly mechanisms and paying attention to the consent of the victim and his role in committing the crime. The aim of the current research is to investigate and analyze the compatibility of criminal jurisprudence with the concept of the central victim in the framework of Iran's criminal law system. The findings of this research, which were collected by descriptive-analytical method and library tools, show that the evolution of new criminal laws in the light of jurisprudence and jurisprudence rules that pay attention to the role of the victim has been very precise and significant. In this regard, the results of the present research indicate that some of the rules and rules of penal jurisprudence are relatively compatible with the victim-centered approach and the model of restorative justice. This has caused the said rules and orders to have the necessary capacity to create changes in the process of criminal proceedings and the chain of repeated victimization. Finally, in relation to the protection restrictions that have been created in some legal institutions, the necessary rethinking and revisions should be applied.

Family jurisprudential rules are composed of general & universal decree of theology, which are the basis of some family legal rules. Laws related to “Resa”, “Ferash”&“Almotalaghe Alrojieh” are specific family rules are only included in family law. The present article studies the content, the document, the provision of its applicability & theological discourse of each rule from the view point of preceding & contemporary theologians & its application in Iranian civil law.

The role of jurisprudential rules in the thought and power of inference of the jurisprudent is an undeniable fact. Despite attempts made in this field thus far, it is still necessary to discuss variousaspects of this problem to prepare the grounds for the introduction of a new discipline in Islamic studies. The present paper is an attempt to study the differences between the rules of jurisprudence and rules of principles of jurisprudence from the viewpoints of jurisprudents,specially those of Imam Khomeini.