In some cases judge think that main punishment cannot have capacity reaching to intention aims completeness punishment write in verdict accompanied by main punishment, even in times that main punishment give a reduction legally judge can apply coincide or following main punishment one or some completeness punishment written in statutory according guilty situation and personality and guilt.in view of general application of rule on that accompanied punishment apply in offences caused Had, Qesas and Tazir by one until six grades it is said that legislator look to penalty only, so it is operable in unintentional offence. Of course punishment in statute is criteria, no punishment written in verdict whether it is possible less than that. Accompanied punishment alike main punishment is reprievable or abeyance. In some cases judge think that main punishment cannot have capacity reaching to intention aims completeness punishment write in verdict accompanied by main punishment, even in times that main punishment give a reduction legally judge can apply coincide or following main punishment one or some completeness punishment written in statutory according guilty situation and personality and guilt.

In jurisprudential literature, Defamation is performed with other punishments. Therefore, the purpose of the punishment of Defamation should be considered with the purpose of other punishments. The question of this article is what assumptions can be made about the purposes of the punishment of Defamation and the associated punishment? In response to the question that has been discussed regarding the fatwas of the jurists on the four crimes of fraud, beshrew, pander and false testimony by descriptive-analytical method, while recognizing the punishment of Defamation as complementary, assumptions of separation of Defamation’ purpose from punishment of the attendant and the complementarity of the purpose of the Defamation in relation to the punishment of the attendant is proposed. If Defamation has a separate purpose, it is the purpose of individual deterrence, general deterrence, or prevention of victimization, and the attendant punishment necessarily pursues one of the above three objectives without being similar to Defamation. If the purpose of Defamation is similar to attendant punishment, both punishments simultaneously pursue a single goal at different levels. However, if defamation is complementary punishment, two hypotheses can be proposed: some goals are complementary to others, and some punishments are complementary to others to a single goal. If Defamation has a separate purpose, it is the purpose of individual deterrence, general deterrence, or prevention of victimization, and the attendant punishment necessarily pursues one of the above three objectives without being similar to Defamation. If the purpose of Defamation is similar to attendant punishment, both punishments simultaneously pursue a single goal at different levels. However, if defamation is complementary punishment, two hypotheses can be proposed: some goals are complementary to others, and some punishments are complementary to others to a single goal.

According to the Islamic Penal Code and the jurists' point of view, the penalties are divided into three categories:1. The main punishment is the punishment provided by law for any offense and must be stated in a court order.2. Supplementary punishment, which is mainly optional. In such a way that in the case of inadequacy, it will punish the offender with additional punishment.3. Subordinate punishment. These penalties are applied in accordance with the main punishment for the offender and are not stated in the lawsuit and the judge is not involved in the application of the subordinate punishment. This is the legislator who in some cases and convictions applies the subordinate punishment. From the point of view of the Islamic Penal Code for the application of the subordinate punishment, in addition to the definite criminal conviction, it is also a condition for its execution. In other words, the punishment is subordinate to the punishment after the main punishment has been committed in deliberate crime.Subsidiary punishment is derived from customary law and is not provided for in the penal jurisprudence of Islam and its criminal law as subsidiary punishment. However, in some penal jurisprudence books, in addition to the main punishment, it has also dealt with subordinate punishment, including deprivation of inheritance and deprivation of apostasy, including the importance of specific instances of subordinate punishment. Islamic jurisprudence and the penal system of Iran.

Lawat[1] is a term used to describe a man's wicked sexual intercourse with another man and the making love of the two with each other. It is one of the cardinal sins in Islam that has been cited in Islamic narration and hadith references as a corrupting element of the generation and the society. Due to the high immoral nature of the mentioned act, Islamic law has considered a severe punishment for it; however, there is a difference of opinion among the Islamic foqaha in punishing the doer {the person who screws} and the other doer {the person who is screwed, i.e., the one on whom the action is done} in lawat. While one view considers the punishment of both to be the same, the other view considers the punishment of the first to be different from that of the latter. The Article 234 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran follows the second view. There is also a difference of opinion in punishing tafkhiz[2]; yet, finally the Article 236 of the Islamic Penal Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran considers the punishment of tafkhiz for the two mentioned doers the same and that is receiving one hundred lashes. The present study evaluates different views and arguments in the punishment of lawat and tafkhiz, and based on Islamic narrations (examining the narrations and hadiths from the viewpoint of their documentation and authenticity ), and the Islamic principles accepts the difference between the punishment of the two doers in lawat and accepts the same punishment of one hundred lashes in the punishment of tafkhiz for the two doers.