The narratives permitting common reading of Quran، despite differences in the readings of Imams and those of common ones، allow people to read as common reading. Some persons regard seven readings as the proof of their permissibility. Others، based on periods، have considered them as permissible only in the Imams era. And some jurists have regarded only Hafs’ narrative as the proof of these traditions. This research، based on seven readings’ currency in the past and some terms such as “peoples’ reading” and “common reading” in regard to Quranic and historical texts، has tried to demonstrate the currency of each reading in the given period can be considered as its’ permissibility. Thus، in the contemporary period in the eastern Islamic world only the Asems’ narrative by Hafs ones is in currency. In these lands، Hafs’ reading is the only proof in regard to the permissibility of peoples’ reading.

One of the criteria proposed in the exegetic texts of the first Islamic centuries for preference of one reading to others is "Common Reading". Some of the contemporary scholars, accusing famous readings of not referring back to the Prophet, consider the Ħafṣ transmission of ʽĀṣim's reading as the Common Reading. Studying the exegetic texts of the first Islamic centuries and especially Maǰāz al-Qurʼān of AbūʽUbaydaMaʽmar ibn Muthannā (d. 210 or 211) as the most important reflection of Quran studies in the 2nd century, we concluded that firstly "Common Reading" is the one that is recited by the majority of Muslims and not necessarily by the authorities of this discipline, and secondly, not necessarily does it conform to the Ħafṣ transmission and therefore this transmission doesn’t enjoy preference to other readings in this respect. Moreover it is recommended to investigate this preference like other preferences in each letter of the disputed cases of Qurʼānic readings separately.

This study is aimed at investigating the impact of task-based learning approach on developed reading comprehension of the EFL learners. To this end، the scores of reading comprehension tests in a group of students experiencing task-oriented method were compared with those of another group taught the common reading and translation method. The participants include 26 master''s degree candidates of educational technology at the Faculty of Educational Sciences، Allameh Tabataba''i University، in the academic year 2012-2013. The researcher randomly selected the subjects from among the female master''s degree candidates of educational technology and divided them into two 13-member groups، namely experimental and control. The experimental group completed the educational text based on the task-oriented lesson plan، and the control group was taught the content with the common method. The measurement tool includes researcher-developed pre-test and post-test on English language reading comprehension at the higher education level. The tests were reliable by 0. 63 and 0. 72 respectively، which was higher than the criterion، i. e. 0. 60. The data analysis method is quantitative، including mean، standard deviation، lowest and highest numbers of the experimental and control groups. The significance test suggested a difference between means of the two groups by means of different t-statistic. Results of the data analysis indicate that the language scores in the experimental group، taught using the task-oriented method، were higher in comparison to those of the control group، taught using the common reading and translation method. Therefore، the task-based method in teaching the English language develops reading comprehension skill of the learners.

In the commentary of Majma’ al-Bayan an impressive concern has been put in to “readings” of the Quran and it covers more than the seven common readings. It is so that citation of companion’s readings and rare readings are usual in this book.The Shaykh Tabarsi predominantly prefers and takes the Haf’s narrative from Asim as principle over other readings while being at the judgment stand between different readings. But in some cases, he prefers “Abu Bakr Sha’aba ibn Ayash’s” Narrative from Asim Over “Hafs’s” Narrative.This paper has studied the preference of choosing the readings of Asim per narrative of Abu Bakr Sha’aba ibn Ayash over the other narrator’s narrative of Asim, meaning Hafs, in the Majma’ al-Bayan commentary book.

Asim is one of the readers of the Quran in the second Islamic century and Hafs is one of his narrators.In current century, reading of Hafs from Asim has become the most common reading among Muslims but this reading, with all its importance and popularity, is not free from some grammatical and morphological doubts. Some examples of grammatical problems in this reading which have provoked the objection of a group of grammar scholars, are as follows:1-"Baynakom" in Surah al-An'am2-"La Nokazziba" in Surah Al-An'am3-"Fa Atalia" in Surah Al-Ghafir4- "Qilihi" in Surah Az-Zukhruf.5-"Arbao" in Surah An-Nur6-"La yahsabanna" in Surah Al-Anfal7-"Lamma" in Surah At-TariqMoreover, These examples have been criticized according to the morphological rules:1-"Qarna" in Surah Al-Ahzab2-"Soedu" in Surah Hud3-"Thummalyaqta'a" in Surah Al-HajjThe present research aims to show the importance of grammatical and morphological rules in criticism of some aspects of the reading of Hafs from Asim by examining the above ten examples. Based on this, it becomes clear that the reading of Hafs cannot be considered beyond criticism.

The commentators have disagreed on the meaning and reason for the revelation of the first verses of Surah Tahrir, The narrations do not cause the revelation of the first verses of this surah in a way that eliminates this difference; Because in addition to the fragmentation of votes and the existence of signs of forgery and distortion in most of them, he has not clearly interpreted this phrase. In this article, we have shown that the recitation of Kasaee, narrated by Abu Bakr ibn Ayyash, paves the way for understanding and interpreting this part of the verse. The emphasis of the narrators of this recitation on the fact that it is the same recitation of Imam Ali (as) shows that it is cited by the Ahl al-Bayt. Therefore, this reading, both in terms of document and semantics and its conformity with the verse, is preferable to the common reading, and the authority of this reading, from accepting the narrations, causes the false revelation of the Sunnis that the secret of the Prophet was announced by Abu Bakr and Omar knows, as well as the Shiite narrations, which were probably forged in contrast to the Sunni narrations and introduces the secret and the head of the Prophet (PBUH) as the guardianship of Imam Ali (AS), and removes the ambiguity in the verse.

Perfectionism, as an ethical theory, has a considerable capacity for providing an explanation of human moral good and happiness. According to a common reading, the core of this theory consists in human essence and man’s essential properties. Its main claim is that one is able to achieve his/her ideal perfection through training and actualizing his/her essential talents. In this view, human nature is intrinsically valuable and thus the development of one’s essential abilities ends in one’s real happiness. In this paper, after a review of various readings of perfectionism and their main claims, we make a critical survey of its elements and arguments. In the next stage the most important objections against perfectionism will be discussed including the refutation of essentialism. The final conclusion will be that perfectionism is much powerful to face the contemporary ethical problems.

According to common reading of Hegel's philosophy, which has been so deeply influenced by the dominance of leftist account, dialectic is a process that enfolds in time. But the acceptance of this viewpoint encounters us with many problems in reconciliation of temporal and logical aspects of dialectic. The origin of this misunderstanding is interpretation of Hegel's conception of time as a vulgar one, i.e. endless succession of temporal moments. We shouldnt be deceived by temporal-teleological implications of Hegel’s thought and neglect his hostility to time. What he intends from history is an eternal circular manifestation of the absolute Idea. The aim of this work is to advocate the priority of logic to history and revision of historicity of dialectic based on the idea of temporal and logical completeness. Hegel’s notion of Tilgung (annulment) of time leads us to a conclusion that overall structure of his philosophy does not have a temporal characteristic.

Research leading an effort to provide an approach to the process of interaction between the mass media and social networks in Production of news main stream and create Social movements with case study of Resistance economy as a pattern of national development.
The popularity of social networks for users (especially mobile messaging-based) media managers have led to more use the capacity of the new technologies of communication for better distribution of their products in cyber space. Composition and interaction of mass media such as news agencies and social media (for distribution of news and social campaign) optimized of the most effective media for implementation national development patterns.
In Iran, The national economy's vulnerability to natural impulses and deliberate global and domestic economy, Policy makers were forced to endogenous, extroverted and tailored model to local conditions with design as resistance economy.
In this study, a comprehensive approach to analysis media close to the discourse of the dominant discourse of resistance economy to 63 text news agency ISNA, FARS, IRIB and on behalf of the three dominant discourse reformers, Sovereignty, conservatives are discussed.
In conclusion, graph of comparative advantages and limitations "online website" and "telegram Channel" news has come, discourse analysis of these three media showed a lack of common reading sense from resistive economy and divergence relative and look at a holistic approach to the media in accordance with the dominant discourse around it.

Freedom and authority are the two essential and inherent needs of mankind. These two concepts are fundamental and complex, yet important in the history of religions, and there has been a great deal of controversy among scholars about their meanings. The present study addressees the central question of whether or not these two concepts are synonymous in terms of philosophical and epistemological view points, and the course of historical evolution. That is, the researcher seeks to answer the following questions: Is Man autonomous? Does he have absolute autonomy or have obligations to fulfill too (determinism)? Are his obligations incompatible with his free will?
The research method in this study is based on library research and takes an analytical and descriptive approach. This study is novel in that it includes a critique of the common reading of freedom and authority, the philosophical synonymy, and the delineation of the boundaries of these two concepts which have caused a great deal of schism among scholars, especially in the new discourse.