نشریه مطالعات راهبردی ناجا
پیاپی 4 (تابستان 1396)

Social order and societal security are the rudiments of social life. The stability and change (for better) in every society is bound up with social order and societal security. Farabi, the first Muslim thinker and political philosopher, reflected on the position of ruler, in his era, and the role he took in the stability and order of society. He believes that the role of a ruler in a utopian society, which abounds with knowledge and wisdom, is to provide basic security and order. While he emphasized the cooperation and coordination between members of a society, he placed a premium on the hierarchical social structure and its preservation for the sake of institutionalization of security and order. Imam Khomeini, one of contemporary Muslim thinkers and the founder of the Islamic Revolution, highlighted security and order in an Islamic society. Imam, like Farabi, contemplated the ontology of politics as wells as societal security and social order and stressed the spiritual aspect of security and order, apart from their materialistic aspects. He believed that the political objective of security and order along with their realization in the society is to provide real security, tranquility and heavenly bliss. Contrary to Farabi, Imam thought that societal security and social order possess abstract and concrete sides. Regarding the social and political events during his life, Imam thought, in addition to the prominent features of the ruler (Vali Faqih) and government, the public support of a government and the cooperation between the people and the government as well as social justice variables play crucial rules in safeguarding the stability and preservation of social order.

Soft-Threats is means doubt in bases and structures of a political system, crisis within values and central thoughts of society and crisis in behavioral and normative patterns of society. Law Enforcement (NAJA) can to control and prevent of the threats process by exact understanding and looking about society’s values and norms identity. Values regarded as basic directing factors to behaviors and norms in all societies. Social norms as definite behavioral patterns, are determined people’s responsibilities in the different condition. All members of society in the light of awareness of norms would be able to act appropriate behaviors to other person expectations. Prevention management and confrontation with Soft-Threats as every other strategic activity, is followed frameworks and principals that Law Enforcement (NAJA) also need to this frameworks (intelligent management, society-based management, detrital management, taking steps in the framework of Law) as protector of Islamic and Iranian values and norms. The purpose of present study is examination of the role of national social values and norms in prevention of Soft-Threats and based on disciplinary approach. In this essay, have been attempted to be given necessary guidelines for encountering against Soft-Threats, by exact studying various grounds of Soft-Threats and collecting the role of social values and norms. For this purpose, on the basis of library study, contents and different views and ideas in this field was collected and in the end of the study, has been given an appropriate guideline and reasonable concluding based on the role of Law Enforcement (NAJA). By considering preformed discusses, concluding as follows: prevention of Soft-Threat required to participation of all members of society and insistence on national and Islamic Iranian values and norms, as well belief to attack and Soft-Threat management of preventive activities, safe-making, deepening to actions, promotion of good and prevention of evil, enforcement of religious beliefs and creeds, faithfulness to God, enhancing the knowledge and insight, use of elites potencies, use of soft method and etc. Obviously, NAJA have an important part in all such activities, because NAJA as protector of national and Islamic values and norms, must be took an effective steps in this area.

One of the features of countries with religious and ethnic diversity is the sketching and performing model and ethnic policy. The aim of this research is comparative study of performed patterns of ethnic policies in studied countries by which both indicators and components of the models to be recognized and both an appropriate pattern for Islamic Republic of Iran can be proposed. Research method in the present study is descriptive – analytic based on method of comparative studies. Findings show that ethnic models and policies in each country, in proportion to geographic and human features, and ruling system on territory could be different so that without regarding to native indicators and elements of the territory, it is impossible to fulfil the exclusive policies of the country. Results indicate that patterns of ethnic policies in Islamic Republic of Iran can’t be a derived special pattern from other countries model, but on the basis of mentioned multiple policies, the ideal pattern in the field of ethnic policies, corresponding to studied policies, is a combining pattern that consist of resembling, pluralism, incorporation, etc. Mentioned model must be concentrated on national consistent and convergent of people. A pattern that in addition to consistency, could be prevented the removing of sub-cultures identity.