فهرست مطالب عدنان عمرانی فر

Accusation of individuals is one of the cases that is strongly condemned in the Qur'anic principles and the narration of the religion of Islam. This descriptive-analytical study shows causes such as: resentment, jealousy, fear; Escape from punishment; greed; arrogance and self-aggrandizement lead to this moral vice and consequences such as: deprivation of psychological security; spread of prostitution; feeling of distrust; war and bloodshed; disgrace of the believer; Divine curse leads to disbelief and divine revenge. At the end of the discussion, it is concluded: Lack of attention to the Qur'anic teachings and narration regarding the accusation against individuals can be the source of many negative social and personal effects and the spread of this moral vice in the Islamic society can destroy the security of society and hinder growth and development. Exalted Muslims, and ultimately living in such a society where people easily blame others, can lead to many mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety and stress among people, so it is necessary to teach Quranic and narration regarding the accusation; Explain the effects and consequences so that people stay away from this moral vice

According to the popular view of Imami jurists, whenever the crime of murder is committed in the forbidden months and the sanctuary of Mecca, the diyat is increased by one third, while the principle in murder, if it is intentional, is qisas and otherwise, diyat is prescribed. Therefore, the extra ransom needs to be proven. This descriptive-analytical research shows that the evidence of the famous saying is debatable. Because, on the one hand, the document of the narrations cited by them has been criticized and should not be the basis of this ruling, the well-known practice according to the view of some jurists can not compensate for this weakness of the document, and on the other hand, the alleged consensus Being on these narrations is a proof and it is not possible to legislate a ruling based on it. Therefore, it seems that the ruling on concentrating blood money in the forbidden months and the sanctuary of Mecca should be reconsidered.

On 2017/ 17/ 7, a child named Benita was abducted during a robbery. Efforts to find the child continued unabated, and the eight-month-old was unable to protect himself until Cook's lifeless body was found inside a stolen car in Tehran's Pakdasht district. The perpetrators of this crime were arrested within a short period of time, and eventually this issue caused a great deal of media coverage. Some jurists considered Benita's murder to be intentional and some to call it quasi-intentional, and there were many discussions and interpretations on the subject. The present article concludes by examining the issues and its analysis (descriptive-analytical) that the lack of attention to the issue of correction and rehabilitation and the dangerous condition of prisoners and also the lack of scientific approach to criminal neutralization of prisoners after release can cause these crimes And about the type of murder; According to the statements and confessions of the defendants; Irrespective of the media coverage of the crime and its impact on the judges' decision, the opinion is that the crime was intentional (paragraph A of Article 291).

influential institution. This branch in the ICC has many uses and advantages, but it should be noted that some of these functions and advantages are specific to the conditions and legal system governing the (ICC). One of the main concerns of all legal systems in the world is fair and fair treatment of a case. It must be accepted that the task of establishing domestic and international courts is nothing but this; otherwise, the establishment of an institution in the name of the court (the place where the right is raised) seems unnecessary. In addition, the establishment of an institution such as the basic branch of Iranian law and the benefits of it is far from the mind. In this paper, after depicting the important functions of the preliminary branch in the ICC, in this paper, the authors conclude that the establishment of the basic branch in Iranian law, in line with the feasibility and feasibility of setting up the basic branch in Iranian law, What exists in ICC can accurately pursue and investigate the prosecution stage, and moreover, it is closer to the principle of impartiality and fairness, but it should be noted that the establishment of this institution in Iranian law can not be a model for change and for Utilizing the effects of its establishment, we need to review and modify the structure by maintaining the nature.

Under Islamic criminal law, hadd is a punishment for which the grounds for, type, amount and conditions of execution are specified in Shari’a. In fact, when a given crime and its punishment mentioned in Shari’a explicitly, unlike Ta’zir, legislator is not allowed to revise or change such crime or its punishment according to expediency or existing circumstances and conditions, but there is a controversy among jurisconsults and lawyers in this regard. This article tries to analyses and reviews the opinions of those believing in possibility of mitigation of hadd sentences or those who believe in so-called “updating” such commands, according to legal and Shari’a bases and also from the perspective of criminology while maintaining the principle of immitigability of hadd. It is also indicated that under Islamic Penal Code of 2013, legislator shows its enthusiasm, comparing to previous Penal Code of 1991, to introduce mitigation to hadd.