مهدی لطفی

With the victory of the Islamic Revolution as a representative of the discourse of revolutionary Islam, the issue of Palestine and the support of liberation movements have been recognized as one of the basic principles of Iran. between the resistance groups, to assume the leadership position of the core of the resistance axis, the main question of this research is what is the role of Iran's model in the formation of the resistance axis. In this research, it is assumed that Iran, as a phenomenon with its own characteristics, has been able to be an identity model for the survival of the resistance movement. The theoretical framework of the research was developed based on the Copenhagen school and the security theory of Bozan. The research method was descriptive-analytical and the required information and data were collected based on documentary and library methods.The result obtained from this research is the formation of a security axis with Iran's leadership, which should play an optimal role and while deepening cooperation and developing relations, in other fields, especially the economic dimension and promoting the position of resistance in the political arena. Domestic countries take steps

The Arab Gulf Council of the regional Persian Gulf counties, known as the Arab Cooperation Council of the Persian Gulf, is considered to be an important and influential milieu in the Arab world due to its strategic position in the Middle East and its vast natural wealth, with its decisions influencing the processes of the Middle East. On May 25, 1981, the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council was formally formed with a gathering of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. It was established when not all Gulf states were present. Although Iran and Iraq are in the Persian Gulf, they are not members of the Gulf Cooperation Council. In this research, we are trying to answer the question of how successful the GCC has been in achieving its declared objectives (especially security)? And Iran's strategy toward it.

Regulatory bodies can be divided in two branches that differ in terms of scope of competence and supervision. Some regulatory bodies have a general dimension and extensive scope of supervision is defined for them. Another category has specific scope and concentrated, but their limitations should not be considered as signs of weakness. They may have a powerful and valuable supervision and deeper and more strategic impact than the general regulatory bodies. The issue of special regulatory bodies, including Information and protection of organizations, compared with other regulatory bodies such as GIO has equal importance. This article seeks to examine the role of this entity in protecting staff and safeguarding the system and taking preventive measures against any hidden plan to deconstruction and creating anarchy in system.