فهرست مطالب naser mohammad nezhad

In this article, using Foucault's political rationality approach and examining the works related to Foucault's political rationality and examining some cases of religious reform, as well as comparing the elements of classical political philosophy and modern political philosophy to identify the three political rationalities "Emirate", "Old Shepherd". The "new shepherd" and their characteristics have been identified, separated and classified, so the necessary criteria for identifying the political rationality of Ayatollah Motahhari and Akhundzadeh have been obtained. In this study, the researcher seeks to answer some basic principles and important questions: "1. What was the political rationality of Ayatollah Motahhari? 2. What was the political rationality of Akhundzadeh? 3- What similarities and differences can be Recognize the political rationality between the two? The results show that Ayatollah Motahari sought a compromise between religion and politics and believed that the two were inseparable, but Akhundzadeh, influenced by humanism, religious reform in Western Christianity and modern Western philosophy. , Believed that religion is the ancestor of politics and according to political thought in the West, believes that religion should not interfere in government.One of the most important concepts that can explain the different intellectual angles of Ayatollah Motahhari and Akhundzadeh is Foucault's political rationality The answer to these three questions seems to have a significant impact on our historical consciousness.

The answer to the question "What was the political thought of Mullah Mohammad Kazem Khorasani in the field of legitimacy of the government in the era of absence, and what did this idea have to do with his constitutionalism?" We express "fixed political thought", and the result of another perspective "political model". "Fixed political thought" is a set of abstract, general and permanent propositions in the field of politics that do not originally refer to the political environment; In contrast, the "political model" is a part of political thought that is originally presented in response to the political environment according to fixed political principles and thought. Therefore, in the present article, which has been done in a descriptive-analytical method with the aim of analyzing the political rationality of the Khorasani clergy regarding governance, it was found that among the research and analytical sources on the political thought of the clergy, there are two important groups. The basis of the legitimacy of the government is the will of the people. By relying on some documents, reports and analyzes of the political positions of the mullahs during the constitutional movement, they have tried to make their thinking in a way compatible with Western democratic ideas, and in contrast. Put other Shiite jurists with political thought. On the contrary of this approach, there is a different and, of course, correct view and interpretation that the mullahs, like other jurists, have expressed in favor of the monopoly of the legitimacy of ruling over the jurists in the age of occultation.