جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « چارچوب بندی » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Communication equipments is one of the most significant tools for information exchange in the modern era. Traditionally, newspapers and printed matters have had a special place in informing and culture-developing. How to framing, highlighting and censoring information in different newspapers represents their political, social and economic approaches properly. If a newspaper is dependent on the governing system of a country, this can be considerably important, so that a realistic analysis of that governing system alongside of various issues can be represented by analyzing and investigating the information structure of text during a certain time. The present study seeks to examine editors-in-chief's articles (including 44 cases) of Egyptian Newspaper "Alahram" by mixed method published during 2018. In this regard, theoretical concepts such as framing, information structure, marking, topicalization and highlighting were used. The findings show that the editor-in-chief presents a cohesive، targeted and oriented about internal reading , regional and international issues by marking language structures and framing audiences' mind in the direction of Egypt governing system specially "Abdol Fattah Al-Sisi" government.

This study describes the sequential pattern of “through-produced” multiple questions using Conversation Analysis that sets the agenda dimension of questions, and the academic conditions that advance its use during turns at talk from five faculty meetings. Results show that a. No first-pair of the “through-produced” questions has been answered; b. the answers to the second-pair questions are achieved through paraphrases, clarifications, keyword repetitions, and circuitous rephrasing until the hearer conforms with the agenda set; c. The subordinates frame their default identities with lower epistemic knowledge, and d. “Through-produced” multiple questions can be a manifestation of Chair’s power. Implications and recommendations for cross-linguistic comparisons are offered to generalize the findings beyond the specific domain of the meeting.