جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "citation analysis" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

The purpose of this research is to analyze the content and citations of the scientific journal of Adabiyat-e-Parsi-e-Moaser(contemporary Persian literature) in the 10-year period of its publication.

The type of this research is applied one and in terms of methodology, it was done by content and citation analysis method and scientometrics techniques. The statistical population under investigation included 265 articles published from the founding year of 1390 to 1400 of Contemporary Persian Literature Magazine.

The research findings showed, Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose (JSPPP), Culture and Folk Literature, Research on Fictional Literature the most citations have been given to the Contemporary Persian Literature (COPL). The reference network of the journal was checked. According to Literary Criticism, Translation Researches in the Arabic Language and Literature, Literary research and comparative literature studies, Language Related Research, Quarterly Scientific Journal of Language Research, Literary Text Research articles received the highest number of references from the Contemporary Persian Literature (COPL). Abolghasem Radfar, Zahra Parsapoor, seyedeh Maryam Ameli Rezaei, Issa Amankhani, Parsa Yaghoobi Janbeh Saraei, Ghodrat Ghasemipour, contributed the most to its scientific production by publishing 5 articles in the journal. article by Pournamdarian, Radfar and Shakri (2013) had the most citations among 265 reviewed items.The authors of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies Research Institute had the largest share of publishing articles in the journal with 33 articles. The findings showed the effective role of the journal in improving the visibility of the authors of the research institute. In order to improve the visibility of journal in web, it was suggested that the journal be indexed in non-Persian authoritative international scientific databases.

In general, it is possible to recognize the growth of the quality of articles in the contemporary Persian literature magazine in terms of the number of references over time. The results showed the effective role of the magazine in improving the visibility of the authors of the research institute. The high half-life of citations, scientific collaborations between different researchers from many universities and institutions in the country, and the high number of citations to journal articles are some of the noteworthy and important results of this research.

The current research aims to review and analyze the content and citations of Poish quarterly articles in humanities education. The research method, content analysis, and citation that was done using Excel and SPSS software. The findings of the research showed that 77 articles were published in 10 issues of this quarterly magazine, from issue 16 to issue 25, of which 48 article titles were written as a group and the rest were written individually, the total number of citations was 2256, and the average number of citations for each article was 29.30. . Authors' self-citation was 10% and on average 10.45 external citations, 1.1 citations from the site, 12.6 citations from books, 14.93 citations from articles, and 0.74 citations from master's and doctoral theses. 65% of the authors of the articles were men and 35% were women. Also, 42.9% of the authors had the rank of assistant professor. Articles with 1135 citations and books with 972 citations are higher than other sources. Qualitative methods were used more with 64%, and curriculum and philosophy subjects with 16.9% also had the largest range of articles. As a result, paying more attention to internal documents, presenting group and interdisciplinary articles, increasing the quality of the publication, and paying attention to the neglected areas of humanities education such as; Physical education, economics, history, law, and other disciplines can lead to the improvement of the quality of the publication.

Scientific journals are very important channels for knowledge spread and represent the achievements of the scientific community. The present study examines the quantitative status of articles in Journal of Lisan-i Mubin with the aim of identifying citation behavior and co-authorship relationships. The present research has been done through Documentary Research with scientometric approach. All articles in Journal of Lisan-i Mubin (2010-2019) have formed the present research population. The data were extracted from Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC) Database and analyzed using citation analysis techniques and co-authorship network. The co-authorship results’ analysis show that authors in this journal are very willing to make scientific collaboration. Dual authorship is the most common collaboration model used in this journal articles. Most of the collaborations among the journal’s authors are within the university and the collaborations are also from their own university. In addition, the current network does not have the desired coherence and density. In this journal, there is a positive and significant correlation between scientific communication and scientific productions variables, which shows that authors with more productions have more participation with other authors in preparing articles.Keywords: scientometrics, Citation analysis, scientific communication, co-authorship, Knowledge Map, Lisan-i Mubin

The purpose of this descriptive study is determining forty Islamic world dominant researchers and studying their status from scientific productions point of view during 2000-2011 in web of science database.the methodology is quantitative and scientomtric type. In present study, variables like number of produced documents, cited documents, the average of citations to each documents, h-Index, document format and language by citation analysis method has been determined. Results show that from quantitative point of view Fan Hack from Malaya with 1887 documents and from qualitative point of view Ganjali from Iran with 9554 citations, are the dominant researchers in Islamic world. The documents format according to results is article and their language is English. Results also show that Iran scientific production in recent years has remarkable growth, so that in last three years Iran production has been duplicated. The lateral result of this study is determining h-index infirmity in disregarding self- citations

The present study aims to determine the citation status in the articles of the Journal of Literary Criticism. This study applies a survey method with a citation analysis approach. All articles published in this journal during 1387-1393 are studied. The co-authorship shows that researchers tend to single productivity. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad was the most productive. Most co-authorship between institutions was conducted by Tarbiat Modares University. The average of citations for each article was 21.1 percent. Most of the citations were to books (76.24%) and then to journals (21.16%). Most of the citations were to Persian sources (69.05%). Sirus Shamisa, Mohammad Reza Shafie Kadkani and Tzvetan Todorov were the most cited writers. Mohammad Nabavi was the most cited translator. "Structure and Interpretation of the Text" was the most cited book. "The Journal of Literary Criticism" and "New literary History" were the most cited journal. "The Journal of Literary Criticism" and "New literary History" were the most cited journal.

This article analyzes the sources which have been cited in articles of Language Related Research. The research method is citation analysis، and data analysis was performed by Excel software. The results showed that in this period of time، 213 articles were published. 162 papers were presented as team work and the rest were individual studies. The books with 3112 citations and journal articles with over 1258 citations were more than from other sources. Among the cited sources of the Persian، 79. 45 percent of the books were written and 20. 54 percent were translation. Also، 97. 49 percent (506) of the Persian journals articles were written and 2. 50 percent (13 cases) have been translation. The highest cited author and translators were respectively، “Hamid Reza Shaeir” with 44 and “Farzaneh Taheri” with 10 citations. The highest cited book in Persian was “Semiotics of discours analysis” with 13 citations. The highest cited journals in Persian and English were the “Journal of Language Related Research” and “Language”، respectively with 76 and 29 citations.

This research is conducted with the purpose of citation assessment and analysis of comparative literature journal during 2007-2013. The results show that this journal within the years under study (7 years)، published 262 articles in 28 issues. The collaboration of researchers shows that within these seven years 51. 15% of articles had just one author. In other words، in the first four years، the scientific collaboration of authors had been weak and the majority of articles were single-authored ones. However، over the last three years authors have tended towards collaborative writing and coauthoring. This research shows that Mehdi Momtahen with 22 articles is introduced as the most prolific author. Also Islamic azad university of Jiroft branch with 46 articles is ranked as the most prolific university. Books form 90% of research sources of the authors of this journal and about 71% of research sources of this journal has been in Persian language.

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively investigate situation in the «Journal of Iranian Association of Arab Language and Literature” with regard to citation behaviors and co-authorship relations using scientometrics method. The findings of the current research indicated that the journals’ impact factor is very low due to lack of citation. The results also showed that 13% of the authors have produced more than 40% of the articles and the» Lotka’s Law«is partly confirm this. A total of 3681 citations of the journal articles have been cited، which equals to 184 citations for each number، on average. So، it is estimated that each article should contain a mean of 22. 04 citations. Some of the well-known references mostly used in these articles include: The Holy Qura’an، the “Lesan al Arab”، “Vafayat ol A’yan”، Majma''al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran، The Inclusive History of the Arabic Literature، and The Book of the Index (Al-Fehrest). A total of 183 authors involved in the production of papers among which 76% of the articles have been written in individual; that is why the authors’ cooperation factor is very low. Generally، according to the articles of this journal، which is a small sample of Arabic Literature، there is no potential reference or writer in this area. Therefore، the rate of scientific cooperations and relations among the authors in this field is very low.