جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "gholamhossein sāedi" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

Gholamhossein Saedi followed writers such as Sadegh Hedayat, Bozorg Alavi, and Jalal-E Al Ahmad in search of social perfection and full-heartedly felt the sufferings and hardships of the society and acted with great excellence in repaying them in his stories. He was one of many writers of the last hundred years and the top story writers in the forties. The stories of that decade reflect the spiritual failures of the intellectuals after the coup on August 19, 1953, and this theme can be seen in many of his writings. One of the most important features of that period was the censorship, ruling the space of writing stories and poems, which caused a group of writers to turn to playwriting and use its symbolic aspect to express their intentions and content. Saedi was also among these writers. He was one of the most successful writers in Iran's dramatic literature. The political themes of Saedi's works were more visible in his plays. According to the political conditions of the 1940s, the subject, and the content of his plays, he has expressed openly or mockingly and satirically issues such as tyranny and oppression, freedom of expression, land reform law, and the confrontation of people's poverty with the current of modernization. Three prominent intellectual cinema films of the years before the Islamic Revolution: Cow, Mina's circle, and Peace in the Presence of others, are taken from Saedi's stories. In addition to analyzing Saedi's works, it will highlight the influence of Saedi's works on the Iranian cinema of that period. To reveal his role and position in the intellectual cinema of the years before the revolution.

The rhetorical and sociological critiques are two writing tools available for literature researchers. They are used for analysis of the writing. Now if we can provide a methodological and purposeful relation between these two types of critiques, the narrow boundary between literature sociology and sociological critique become more evident. Meanwhile the dynamism and fluidity of writing tools is strengthened and the capabilities of author and the capacities of its writing are known more than ever. The main question of current research is represented like this, how relevant and discussable is the relationship between rhetorical critique and sociological critique while performing literature researches? And essentially how can we achieve the dynamism and fluidity of critique through this path? In the current study, we tried to apply mixed method (basic and applied researches with quantitative and qualitative focuses) and by using library research over three less known stories of Gholamhossein (Stories of Morgh-e-Anjir, Pygmalion and Seda Khone), detect the boundary between literature sociology and sociological critique in a practical manner. In addition, a methodological relation is created between rhetorical critique (knowledge semantics, expression and prosody) and sociological critique (Pierre Bourdieu’s action). Overall, Research findings indicate that: 1) Using the knowledge of rhetoric, one can understand the habits of people, their capital and position in the field of social space, 2) As soon as there are changes in the capital and position of individuals, purposeful changes take place in the rhetorical sector. 3) With regard to this, not only the story is examined in the literature layer of the text, but also the functionality and dynamics of the literature are explained. 4) It is also possible to understand the abilities of a writer such as GholamHossein Saedi, how delicately he writes and gives a rhetorical color to sentences, and with this change, the characteristics of sociologists also change. This research is an introduction to new research in the field of literature and is a beam between multiple beams.