جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "ibn sina" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

One of the important intellectual foundations of Islamic mysticism is the belief in the kingdom of the soul and its derivation from the Alawite world and its confinement in the earthly body. In the Islamic world, Ibn Sīnā first portrayed this belief in Ayniyya ode with an allegory Ibn Sīnā's allegory is shaped by the symbol of Varqā or pigeons, and this pigeon descends from its high place and is captured in body cage. In one of the stories of Tāqdīs, the story of Parrot and Shah, Mulla Ahmad Narāqi advances belief in the fall of the soul, like Ayniyya ode, with the allegory of the bird. At first glance, it is obvious that the bird in Tāqdīs is parrot, and in Ayniyya is pigeons, as well as the language of Tāqdīs, Persian and its poetic form is Mathnavi, while the language of Ayniyya ode is Arabic and its poetic form is Ode. However, the points of sharing and differentiating these two works require careful examination. The present article deals with this issue. Accordingly, the main issue of the present study is the expression of the points of commonality and differentiation between the story of parrot and shah from Mathnavi Tāqdīs Mulla ahmad Narāqi and Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode.

Research Methodology The method of this article is analytical-comparative method, considering that the base of allegory of both poems is the same, commonalities and differentiations in paying this allegory will be determined, analyzed and compared with each other.

Several articles have been written separately about the Ayniyya ode and Mathnavi Tāqdīs, including the articles "The Gnusian Structure of Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode ", "Symbolism in Ibn Sīnā's Ode and its Reflection in the Thought of Muslim Mystics", "Comparative Study of Two

Ibn Sīnā's Mystical Ayniyya Ode and Ali Via Eram-Nasib Al-Arida". Analysis of Mathnavi Tāqdīs and its impressed by Mathnawi" and "Molanaye Naraq and Mathnavi Tāqdīs", but as their titles show, none of the authors compared the story of Parrot and Shah Mathnavi Tāqdīs to the Allegorical content of Ayniyya ode.

The main purpose of this study is to explain the points of commonality and differentiation between the allegorical story of parrot and shah from Mulla ahmad Narāqi's Tāqdīs Mathnavi and Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode.

The similarities between parrot and shah's story and Ayniyya ode: The descent of the soul from the high world: 1. The most important similarity between parrot and shah's story with the Ayniyya ode is the unity of their main theme that’s mean belief in the the descent of the soul from the high world and its Imprisonment in the prison of the body. Captivity of the soul in the flesh : 2. In their poems, both Ibn Sīnā and Narāqi refer to the captivity of the soul in the flesh and speak of the reluctance of the soul of this confinement. Soul moaning from parting : 3. In both works, the soul whines on parting its original homeland. soul desire to reach the joiner: In both works the soul is in the desire to reach the joiner, which is the same as reaching the original homeland. The material world is like Ruined. Both works see the material world as ruins for the soul. Cause of soul's descension : Both works consider the cause of descension of the soul to be perfection and awareness. Cause of Forgetting the Quds Court : Both works state that the soul, because of belonging to the body and engaging in its needs and other manifestations of the material world, forgets its original origin and homeland, which is the shrine of Quds. The upward trajectory of the soul : In both works, the soul, despite its descension , ultimately has an upward trajectory and will return to its homeland. The differences between parrot and shah's story and the Ayniyya ode: Differences in allegorical birds : 1. The bird that Ibn Sīnā has chosen is a pigeon, but Narāqi has used parrot allegory, which is interesting considering its eloquence and imitatet. Reaction and non-reaction of the soul to accept the descension: 2. As a result of Ibn Sīnā, the pigeon reluctantly welcomes travel, but there is no parrot reaction as a result of Narāqi. The devil's involvement and non-interference in the oblivion of the original homeland : In the work of Narqi, contrary to Satan's objectives, he is also involved in the oblivion of the original homeland. Presence and absence of guidance in the downward trend : Objectively, the guide allegory is not used. Usage and non-usage of philosophical discussions and terms : In the same terminology, questions and astonishments of philosophy are raised that these things are not seen in the Narāqi,s work. Conclusion Undeniably, the story of "Parrot and the Shah" , Masnavi, "Mullah Ahmad Narāqi", regardless of the difference in language and poetic form, is similar to the Ayniyya ode of " Ibn Sīnā" in terms of allegorical and themes. This similarity has been carried out in two main aspects of meaning and form. In terms of meaning, the idea of the soul 's descension from the realm of the kingdom to the material world and his captivity in prison and his attempts to get rid of this prison constitute the theme of two works. Also, in terms of form, both effects are based on the coded allegory of bird,in the first is pigeon and in the second is parrot. In general, the common points of the themes of these two works are: The descent of the soul from the high world, The captivity of the soul in the flesh,Soul moaning from parting, soul desire to reach the joiner, The material world is like Ruined, the cause of the fall of the soul, the cause of the oblivion of the Quds Court and the upward course of the soul and the differentiation points of their themes: the reaction and lack of reaction of the soul to accept the fall, interference and non-interference of satan in the oblivion of the main homeland, the presence and absence of guide in the downward trajectory and using and not using philosophical discussions and terms.

Reason is one of the sources of knowledge in human existence and human forces that distinguishes between good and evil or right and wrong. This has led many scientists and mystics to reflect on this issue among whom are Ibn Sina and Rumi. The purpose of this study is to study the nature of reason, its relationship with love and religion, factors and obstacles to reaching the perfection of reason and finally to find its differences and similarities in the thought of the master of philosophy, Ibn Sina and the master of love, Maulana. The results of this research, which has been done in a descriptive-analytical way and based on library resources, shows that the difference between Ibn Sina and Rumi in the subject of intellect is more than their commonalities, and this is because the master of philosophy considers intellect as an active intellect and considers it as one of the human and carnal powers, but the master of love considers it as the first creation of the Almighty and the human heart as its source.

In this article we intend to bring joy and happiness form the perspective of the eighth method of references and punishments of ibn sina the great scientist of Islamic iran and the world ( science- philosophy and logic- medicine and wisdom) with the poems of rumi the great poet of iran and the world lets examine and compare him as a mystic and thoughtful scholar in Islamic thought and hafez the great lyric poet of the eighth century. Given the importance of the issue and the influence of all three nobles in the discussion of Islamic science philosophy and mysticism research in this regard is essential. Assuming that ibn sina mystical language in the eighth method is significantly similar to rumi language in divan shams and masnavi and hafez lyric poems in his divan we answer the important question of how rumi and hafez language in their poems with ibn sina about pleasure and happiness? We came to this conclusion by bringing documents form the eighth method of ibn sina allusions and punishments and rumi poems in divan shams and masnavi and lyric poems form hafez divan rumi poems are mentioned in two great works and hafez lyric poems have significant similarities with the concepts of the eighth method of allusions and punishments about pleasure and happiness and its synonyms.

Prose texts constitute a large part of Persian literature and its breadth is suitable for expressing any thought more than the words of the poem. The topics and concepts used in prose are generally divided into scientific and intellectual concepts, descriptive, narrative and news meanings, each of which is different from the other in terms of writing style, which includes topics such as religious issues, national celebrities, Stories and stories, history of astronomy, advice and sermons, Tersel, Sufism and mysticism, literary sciences, etc. This article will examine the stylistics of Persian works of Ibn Sina prose from a syntactic perspective.

This article is based on library studies and has been done in a descriptive-analytical manner.

Although most of Ibn Sina's works are written in Arabic; But he has written eight works in Persian: Alaei encyclopedia, radiology, scrap of nature, treatise on the truth and quality of the order of beings and the sequence of causes, Kunuz al-Mu'azmin, the criterion of the intellect, and Zafarnameh in Persian. These works are related to the period of language development. Persian and the early period of Persian prose are known as Mursal prose style. Mursal's prose works in the early period of the Persian language are generally devoid of literary features; Also, due to the scientific topics of Ibn Sina's works, the intellectual level in these works will not have much prominence.

Simple verbs and short sentences, word brevity, simplicity of language and fluency, short sentences and emptiness of tasks and verbal cues, avoiding rhyme and balance and avoiding the use of unfamiliar Arabic words and inclusion of technical terms are important features of books. Persian is the prose of Ibn Sina.

The causation has a special and important role in the philosophy, especially traditional philosophy. Main question in this study is whether the description of causal relations in Islamic philosophy can be justified and explained in the framework of the theory of conceptual metaphor. The study is focused on theology section of Healing written by Ibn Sina. The book of Healing is one of the most important works of Ibn Sina. The theology section of this book should be considered as the most important philosophical work of Ibn Sina. To answer the question, conceptual metaphors of causation in this book are identified. Ibn Sina uses many different words to describe the causal relations. By extracting and categorization of those words, several conceptual metaphors about causation are found.  In this study, the role and importance of every one of these conceptual metaphors is determined by statistical method. The statistical data is extracted by counting words related to source domain of conceptual metaphors.  Conceptual metaphors related to causation in the book can be divided into two major sections: metaphors based on the primary metaphor of “Cause Is Physical Force" and metaphors based on natural causation. By extracting the abundance of each of the above metaphors, it becomes clear that the metaphors based on natural causation have a greater frequency in Ibn Sinachr('39')s theology of Healing.

Salaman and Absal is a symbolic and allegorical story which though has root in Greek civilization but has been formed in Iranian culture. The existence of several narratives of this story in our literary history show its importance among thoughtful group of Iranian society. The potential of this symbolic story to create the profound concepts has been influenced by the creativity of several poets and writers. They have recreated it through consecutive centuries in order to comply the expectations of readers. Sheikh Al-Rayis Abu Ali Sina is the first person which has coded Salaman and Absal. Then, Fakhr Razi, Khaje Nasir toosi, Jami and Navidi have tried to decode the esoteric concepts of this narrative. With several years of effort, Khaujeh-nasir made two apparently different narratives from Salaman and Absal and aimed at finding the purpose of Abu Ali Sina in Namat nine of “Al-Isharat, Al-Tanbihat" book with the narration attributed to his master by Abu Abid Gorgani, the student of Ibn Sina. Since the study of the interpretations of a work in modern literary critique has also gained a certain place, and Gérard Genette, French contemporary researcher, has allocated part of his transtextuality as metatextuality. In this research, we tried to answer the question that can we achieve a new type of metatextuality with studying the commentaries and paraphrases of Salaman and Absal? The result of this study is the retrieval of two types of continuous and discontinuous metatextualities. This research also shows that the dominant descriptions of Salaman and Absal have been made by the influence of the philosophical thoughts of Ibn Sina.

The present study strives to compare the contents of two prominent mystic works: Attar Neishabouri’s Mantiq al-Tayr (Road of Flight) and Ibn Sina’s Risalat al-Tayr (Book of the Flight), which has been conducted through research and the qualitative and quantitative content analysis method. To facilitate the understanding of the comparisons, tables and charts have been provided. The findings suggest that similar effects are mainly found in the contents. The most important similarity between the two works is that of their subject. The sign of "Bird" (‘Tayr’) and the theme of unity are prominent. The other similarities include destination, purpose of flight, the story of the process of "self-discovery", and expression of distrust. The differences in form include: 1. difference in the form of expression, 2. Word choice, and 3: elements of the story. The differences in content include: 1. difference in the need for a sage, 2. how to express themselves, 3. in considering the worthiness of the mystic, 4: attitudes towards the divine source, 5: in being epic, 6. in the quest plan, and 7: in attitude towards the job of the seeker.

The Ode of Eyniyyeh is full of poetic elements and delicate and elegant artistic taste in the definition of soul which shows Ibn Sina' philosophy. With an intuitive and illuminist cognition and taste of wisdom, he created this ode in order to free selfness from this earthly world and return it to its place in heaven with the prerequisite of science and practice. Through an analytical attitude, the writer tries to discuss the principles behind the composition of this ode and make a clear judgment out of the different ideas surrounding its composition.

In the history of Persian language, there are some untouched points which may not be fully understood excep though a detailed study of the texts belonging to different periods of the evolution of this language. The present article focuses on the linguistic features of Dánesh-Náme 'Aláyi by Ibn Sina, which is no doubt one of the most important Persian texts of the 5th Century, in oder to shed some light on one of the less studied period of the history of Persian. To gain this objective, the article provides a review of the works done on Persian texts, as well as introducing the Persian writings of Ibn Sina. The prose style of the Sámánid era(during which Ibn Sina lived),as well as hismethods in providing the new terminologies of his expertis, are followed by a detailed report on the linguistic characteristics of Dánesh-Náme 'Aláyi, with a Special attention to one of its several treatises entiled Resáleye Eláhiyyát.