جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « تصویر » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The role of system leadership in efficiency public diplomacy through image managementAbstractPublic diplomacy is one of the effective factors to achieve Iran's foreign policy goals. The position and role of Imam Khomeini and the Supreme Leader in directing the public opinion of other nations in order to protect the values of Islam and the revolution is of great importance. In this article, in response to the main question, what is the role of the regime leadership in presenting a positive and favorable image of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in order to ensure national interests and Islamic interests This hypothesis was tested that according to the leadership position of the system in the political-legal structure of the country, in activating, strengthening and efficiency of public diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran through image management, establishing continuous communication with other nations and raising awareness of world public opinion. To the goals, values and ideals of Islamic Iran, it has a decisive role in the acceptability and legitimacy of Iran's image in the region and beyond. Accordingly, the definition and explanation of public diplomacy and its relationship with the system leadership, can help to identify the factors affecting public diplomacy and take more advantage of opportunities.

Decision-makers in democratic countries usually try to take into account the current opinions and perceptions that exist in society. One of the most common ways to identify public opinion on a topic is to conduct a survey. It can provide a clear understanding of the people's views on a topic in a country. However, if we want to obtain a comprehensive picture of a society’s perception of another country, we need to look at public opinion and their viewpoints from various angles. Therefore, the present study attempts to examine three aspects of the image American people have of Iran, and this is done using Image Theory in International Relations. Since public opinion in the United States is one of the influential factors in the foreign policy decision-making process and the American people’s image of Iran has an important impact on US-Iran relations, the main question of the present study is how do the American public view Iran and what aspects does this include? The results of this case study show that the American people's perception of Iran resembles the stereotypical image of a "relative enemy". This conclusion was obtained by examining the following three dimensions: Iran's position, Iran’s capabilities, and Iran’s political values.

The main purpose of this study is to design a new method for image recognition in international relations. According to image theory, images are said to play an important role in decision-making and policy-making; It is believed that leaders make decisions not on the basis of "reality" but on the basis of their "image of reality". In this regard, the discovery of the subject-identifier image of the known object can be used to explain and even predict the decisions made by the subject-identifier. In this regard, this study has tried in an innovative way to count the image of Barack Obama as President of the United States of Iran from Iran. So the main question is what is President Barack Obama's image of Iran and what are its characteristics? The results of this study show that Barack Obama's image of Iran is similar to the stereotypical image of "relative enemy". This result was obtained by examining the three dimensions of Iran's position, capability, and political values ​​from Obama's point of view, which include threatening, relative power, and different political values, respectively.

Value, credibility, dignity, soft power, advantage, profit, power and ... are attached to the name of the country with the positive image. The value of the perceptual image of the nation and the country is like the invisible golden. One of the important facts about that is the competition between citizens and ordinary people in the world, for access to the name and passport of a credible country. Nowadays, South Korea's name along with an industrial product or cultural production gives the valuable power to that production. Accordingly, the main question of the present research is that what is the most important factor in the success of the Korea's nation branding and Korea's positive image around the world? This paper tries to explain and conceptualization of the nation branding field and then examines the construction and policy of nation branding spread of Korea by Korean wave. This paper emphasizes that the most important factor in the success of Korea's global image and management of its reputation is the strategic institutionalization.

Nation branding in conception meaning way is rebuild, construction and Change of image of the country in outside of the land which perception by foreign people, stakeholder and international public opinion. Originally Nation branding is align of the nation with reality. This is so important matter for countries which passed many fundamental changes in their political, social and economic systems. More often image of these countries always is different from their reality. This paper tries to examine what is the nation branding and national image making and its goals and its focus. Then paper emphasis that nation branding as interdisciplinary theory can provide new perspective and new studies for political science and international relation studies in Iran and later on scholars and students in Iran can extensive use from this theory.

In Baudrillard's view, everything has become image, and image has transformed the whole reality into a virtual reality. So we face a huge collapse in different areas. The borders have disappeared, and it is no longer possible to distinguish not only between art and other objects, but also, for example, in the field of various sciences. In other words, in the acute-reality period, there can be no distinct boundary between the various fields of science. But the acute-reality period is the period of interdisciplinary sciences. Baudrillard argues that the acute-reality period is the period of metanarratives absence. In such a situation where the boundary between different things is gone, art certainly cannot have a unique identity. As a result, today, anything represented as an artwork, is null. As art cannot exist, what remains is the absence of art. Artworks imply that the identity of art as a distinct object is lost and that what still exist are the same objects of everyday life. In this regard, art is a null thing.

The perception of a nation's image by foreign audiences has a historical, cultural, political and international background. Russia with thousands of years of history and identity is a good case for study. The paper examines the image and brand of Russia in today's world with an emphasis on Iran and it is using a descriptive-analytical method with describing the concept of nation branding and nation image making. The main question of paper is How Russia's image in Iran perceived? To answer the question, the paper emphasis that image of Russia in the regional and international environment, including Iran, is a negative image, partly based on a massive media advertising campaign in the West and partly is based on historical reasons. In other hands, part of this negative image came from the dreaming of the superpower by Russia and also bullying of the closed ring of Russian oligarchy politicians and elites for other countries, which is the legacy of the Soviet government. Accordingly, the brand and image of Russia between civil society in Iran and the West (apart from the discussion of governments) are common on the basis of historical and political reasons, and this image was and is negative and dark. The main factor behind this negative image of Russia in Iran is history.

Mythical and epical figures continue to live in the religious, cosmological, mythical as well as lingual and literary memory and native perceptions in Iran despite the destructive and anti-civilizational domineering attempts which some times pushed the Iranian society to brink of disintegration. These figures have been intermingled with the new Iranian-Islamic elements and in some cases they have given their own coat to these new elements. A large number of historical, philosophical and literary works of the predecessors underline the persistence of these ancient elements in our historical-cultural and lingual identity. The presence of these elements in the poems of Moulavi underline a fateful cultural-literary and identity-oriented resurrection which began for the first time with the composition of versified and prosaic Shahnamehs and the revival of the Persian literature (particularly from the time of the Samanid dynasty to the era of Ale-Buyid). They indeed consolidate the establishment of the foundations of nationality and continuation of the sense of patriotism and then spread to the arena of gnostic literature, including the poems of Moulavi. Among the manifestations of this cultural-literary resurrection in the works of Moulana one may mention the presence of mythical and epical figures of the ancient poetry like Jam, Keikhosrow, Fereidoun, Rostam Dastan, Eskandar, Khosrow and Shirin, Farhad and Shirin, and Veis and Ramin.