جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "مبانی جرم انگاری" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The manner of response to sexual crimes is significant because, on one hand, it directly relates to one of the five objectives of Islamic law, which is the protection of lineage, and on the other hand, it appears that there is a presumption of strictness in proving such crimes. In Article 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, enacted in 1392 (2013), which addresses the categorization of the criminal justice system's response to sexual crimes, the legislator has superficially addressed the legal standards, unaware that this provision, firstly, prohibits investigations into certain sexual crimes that should be addressed according to Islamic law; secondly, if the basis for initiating an investigation into these crimes is the principle of harm (and not legal paternalism), it is unclear why the evidence must be relevant. Furthermore, if the distribution or dissemination of pornographic moments through film or photo occurs widely, while the sexual crime itself has not occurred in any of the ways mentioned in the above article, it is unclear what fate awaits the perpetrators of this recent crime, who may be professional prostitutes! This inquiry seeks to analytically address the above issues and reveal the criminal policy that the legislator is pursuing. In this context, it seems that the legislator does not consider consensual adultery (as opposed to organized, violent, visible, and public acts with a complainant) to be subject to any conditions for prosecution, whereas the immediate example addressed in verse 3 of Surah An-Nur pertains to this type of adultery.

In Iran's administrative law, job abuse review boards, including important oversight mechanisms within administrative agencies to establish the rule of law and justice and establish an administrative system to govern the behavior of employees in the office environment, have been formed. Some of the crimes of those involved in office work are violations that need to be reported to administrative violations committees, and these agencies are required to investigate them, and this task is not merely an ethical one, but is set by the Iranian legislature to enforce it. This is where criminality is important in office jobs. The extent of the criminalization and the extent of the state's criminal interference in various areas, including administrative jobs to the type of political system in each country, the prevailing ideology and, ultimately, the type of criminal policy model often found in major constitutional strategies, It is closely related. Generally speaking, criminality is a process whereby the legislator forbids existing verbs or derelicts, taking into account their own accepted norms and values and relying on their accepted theoretical foundations, and for which criminal prosecution is enforced. She also points out that there are instances of workplace crime in Iran that need to be transformed. The purpose of this article is to investigate the fundamentals of Iran's criminalization of administrative jobs.