جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "efficiency" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

One of the Functions of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, along with the legislative and monitoring functions, is parliamentary diplomacy. Efficiency and effectiveness are multi-layered categories that are affected by both structural and agent elements. The main question of this research is what factors reduce the efficiency of the diplomatic activities of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. It seems that the efficiency of the diplomatic activities of the 12th Islamic Consultative Assembly requires creation of required structures, the amendment of the Internal regulations of the legislative power, continuous improvement of the processes and evolution both parts of the structure – agent. The most important goal of this research is to identify obstacles and requirements for empowering the diplomatic activities of the 12th Islamic Consultative Assembly through the collection of library information and content analysis of documents and experiences of parliamentary assemblies. For this reason, this research is included under applied, strategic and developmental research.

According to the definition provided by most theorists in the fields of sociology and political science, "a party is a political group whose goal is to achieve and gain power peacefully." The formation of political parties and movements in Iran has its roots in the Constitutional Revolution and has typically emerged within the frameworks of liberal, leftist, and religious movements. However, when examining the process of the formation and development of parties in Iran, it becomes evident that political parties have always had a specific definition and, consequently, their own frameworks and limitations based on the type of constitution of the country. This issue has led to a divergence between the understanding of political parties and the definition agreed upon by theorists, making it difficult to establish a theoretical relationship with that definition. In this context, the increasing influence of party personalities in Iran, particularly the personality-centric approach of an individual within a party, has complicated the functions of these parties and raised questions about the extent to which they can impact and be influenced. Thus, the research initially poses the central question: To what extent has the personality-centric party thinking among elite members influenced the effectiveness of parties, specifically the National Trust Party, from 2005 to 2013?

Theoretical Framework:

The role of elites in political and party arenas is typically divided into two broad categories. In the first category, elites are considered the primary or perhaps the sole factor in party decision-making processes. In the second category, the political and party elites' roles are seen as minimal, being influenced by environmental factors and conditions. However, alongside these two theories, a third perspective emerges, viewing political and party elites not as possessing exclusive roles with absolute agency in decision-making nor as being entirely subject to environmental conditions. Instead, this perspective introduces them as factors alongside other influential elements in decision-making, policy-making, and governance processes.

Given the focus of this study on "the role of personality-centric party thinking among elite party members on the effectiveness of the National Trust Party from 2005 to 2013," a foundational conceptualization theory has been applied. It is important to clarify that foundational conceptualization is inductively discovered through the precise collection and analysis of qualitative practical data. Therefore, since this form and framework of research does not begin with a theory, the first phase commences with the research background, allowing the collection of data to stabilize related theories. This section outlines the methods of conducting interviews and the process of analyzing the information through open, axial, and selective coding stages, accompanied by coding tables. Furthermore, the process of theorizing (foundational conceptualization) using the codes and the research narrative is explained, culminating in the presentation of the desired research model. Consequently, data collection methods were conducted through two approaches: first, documentary-archival and library methods; and second, field-based interviews with elite party members and political specialists in government administration and academia in the fields of sociology and political science. The research subject is observable due to its ongoing nature, and valuable works related to the research topic have been utilized. In other words, this research is a combination of qualitative methods and content analysis.

The findings were analyzed in two dimensions: structural organization and individual functioning of a party based on the data collected, leading to the extraction of categories and coding of data. Overall, the research concluded that Iranian parties, including the National Trust Party, often suffer from a common operational issue: the lack of attention to structural dynamics toward positive centrism to mitigate the minimal effects of environmental, individual, systemic, psychological, and operational factors. In other words, despite the elite's effective verbal analysis in the discourse, they fail to consider any of the aforementioned aspects in practical and operational domains. In fact, the action model of the elites is more often based on traditional, emotional, and spontaneous (network-oriented) frameworks than being rational and based on acquired data necessary for building structures and identifying elites to strengthen the cadres for consolidation and continuity. Thus, Iranian parties, particularly the National Trust Party, face fundamental challenges regarding party phenomena and active elite actors. Therefore, it can be said that the rational action model, due to various social and political factors, has not been able to overcome the party environment and elite members. The traditional actions of party activists manifest in familialism, grandiosity, kin-centeredness, and emotional actions in specific ideological interpretations of religion or social doctrines. This self-centeredness hinders the consolidation and effective functioning of parties and other elites within the party. The reasons behind the failure to overcome structuralism, mechanisms for identifying elites, realism, strategic approaches, party mechanisms, programmatic commitments, and committed interpretations of religion and social doctrines—as indicators of the rational action model (requirements for party activity and consolidation)—stem from a departure from creating structural actions and mechanisms for identifying elites. This results in environmental, systemic, psychological, and operational factors having the most significant influence on the party and party elites, thereby destabilizing the party's consolidation. In the case of the National Trust Party, when Mehdi Karroubi lost the election and proceeded to establish the National Trust Party, becoming its secretary-general, he himself became a symbol of grandiosity and self-centeredness. However, Karroubi's post-election stance after the 2009 presidential elections and his support for the oppressed forces by the ruling system reflects a rational action model focused on his values and, naturally, the values of the active members of the National Trust Party. It can be inferred that the action model of the active members of the National Trust Party experiences confusion between tradition, emotion, and to some extent, rationality aimed at values. This confusion does not align well with the necessities for party activity and consolidation that demand a rational action model. Perhaps, if the party members' activities in recent years had not faced extensive limitations, a continuous action process among the activists of this party could have emerged, resulting in a better-formed rational action model among its members.

New approaches indicate that the role of political and party elites is crucial for separating public affairs from past methods and traditions, emphasizing the need for continuous review and analysis according to changing temporal and environmental conditions. This ensures that the groundwork for decision-making based on appropriate and timely thoughts is established. Therefore, the role of party elites in modern society combines new norms, methods, goals, and attention to temporal and spatial conditions, transcending the traditional top-down communication patterns. In other words, the hierarchical roles of the past no longer meet contemporary decision-making needs, and the interaction and roles of party elites—especially their influence—have undergone transformation and change. Consequently, the intellectual and professional roles of political elites cannot be defined merely in relation to a top-down structure; they depend on linear definitions and connections with other entities. As a result, the activities of political and party elites are positioned within a broader and more complex framework, where the legitimacy of these elites arises from processes informed by the study of political science.

In Islamic Doctrines, human power has been extremely important in order to advance the actions and goals of the Islamic government and its organizations, such as the Imamate, and as the basic capital for the realization of the divine missions of these organizations, it has always depended on the efficiency of its forces. The individual qualification of the selected forces is the introduction of their social influence as the management arms of the leaders of the society. Relying on the descriptive and analytical method from the point of view of the statements and orders of the Infallible Imams (AS) and the comparative study of the ideas and methods of Ayatollah Shahid Beheshti with those statements, as one of the leaders of the Islamic Revolution, this article deals with the issue of indicators that human collections with Paying attention to these criteria, they can choose efficient human capital for their system. The main question of the article is as follows: What are the similarities and differences between the indicators of efficient manpower in the idea and method of Ayatollah Martyr Beheshti compared to the words and sayings of the infallible imams (AS)? In response to this question and as a hypothesis, it should be said that both Imam Masoom and Martyr Beheshti firmly believed in the use of efficient human resources and tried to ensure that such resources have efficiency indicators and religious indicators at the same time. However, the approach of Martyr Beheshti, in contrast to the life of the Infallible Imams (PBUH), has focused more on the context of revolution developments, international experience, and organizational and organizational work, and the approach of the Infallible Imams is a general and universal approach. The data of the article has been collected in a documentary way.

Sovereignty as the source of government (government) has a distinct role in good governance, in this sense, the current research aims to explain the role of the efficiency of the governance system in realizing good governance; It aims to answer the question: "Does the efficiency of the governance system in the Islamic Republic of Iran play a decisive role in the realization of desirable governance with an Islamic approach?". For this purpose, a descriptive-analytical research method has been used to investigate the issue. To answer the aforementioned question, the dimensions of concepts and theoretical foundations were explained, and then the indicators effective in the efficiency of the governance of statistics and communication and the degrees of importance of their role in the efficiency of governance and the realization of desirable governance with the Islamic approach were determined. In line with the hypothesis of the research, which states: "The efficiency of the governance system of the Islamic Republic of Iran has a decisive role in realizing the desired governance with an Islamic approach", the results indicate that:among the three elements of governance ( government , civil society and private sector_citizens), the government as the manifestation of authority, objective symbol of governance governance, due to having various instruments"political power" plays an important role in achieving the good governance of islamic state .

The issue that this article pursues is that the Islamic Republic of Iran is in a time, place and situation that suffers from semantic eclecticism in the concept of government, practical eclecticism in the concept of state, nostalgic eclecticism (sweet regret) of the concept of state, and eclecticism in The two-dimensionality and two-hour existence of the state has meant the state, so as long as it has not gone through these four eclipses and chaos, the concept of the state meaning the state is always in the field of opinion and more in the field of action with challenges. And will face fundamental crises. To explain this idea and to answer the main question which is; How can government mean state in the Islamic Republic of Iran? We use the critical theoretical framework and methodology of historical sociology and follow the hypothesis that; "It can be successful in the desired governance." It must be overcome. It is the semantic confusion or crisis of the title with meaning that is the subject of this article.

One of the moral virtues is "ignoring" and overlooking the mistakes and mistakes of others, which is emphasized by reason and Sharia and is the most desirable of all, but it is more desirable than government officials who have more authority; Because the effects of their negligence have been deeper, it has attracted more people in the society, and it increases their level of satisfaction with the Islamic government. The question of this research is what effect does the negligence of the rulers on the mistakes and errors of the people in the society have on the efficiency of the Islamic government. This research, based on library sources and in an analytical-descriptive way, based on the Qur'an verses and the government history of the Prophet (PBUH) and Imam Ali (PBUH), examines the role of negligence of the rulers in the efficiency of the Islamic government. Among the findings of this research is that increasing the level of people's satisfaction and preventing them from violently dealing with the rulers, preventing people's feelings from being provoked, raising the social and spiritual status of the rulers among the people, and preserving the unity of the Islamic society from the consequences of the rulers' negligence. It is towards the errors and mistakes of the people of the Islamic society and the observance of this moral principle by the rulers has a decisive role in advancing the goals of the government, the most important of which is to guide the people to the happiness of the world and the hereafter, and it will ensure its survival and continuity. The result will increase its efficiency.

Effectiveness is one of central topics in political sphere that is important for governments. Effectiveness actually provides the basis for stability and sustainability of political systems. The purpose of this research is to investigate the efficiency challenges in judiciary system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the years 2000-2019 in terms of political stability. The main question of the research is that what challenges has Islamic Republic of Iran judiciary system faced in the field of efficiency during the given time span, and what solutions can be proposes to upgrade and strengthen the efficiency of this issue? A qualitative research method using is used and interviews with 30 legal experts are the basis of analysis. Transcribes are categorized in tables in the form of ID codes, key points, and open codes. Findings indicate that the major challenges of the judiciary system during 2000-2019 are:  independence of judges, delay in proceedings, internal and external pressures and lack of full implementation of the law. In order to solve these challenges, maintaining the judicial independence of judges, fighting against economic corruptors, reducing the delay of proceedings, complying with the implementation of laws and regulations, cooperation other legal bodies and governing institutions, and eliminating the pressure in judicial cases are among the ways to improve the efficiency of the judiciary and are in line with making an stable political system.

The main question of this article is what is good governance and what are its differences with bad governance? This article was compiled based on sources and library study in the field of governance . In the explanation of the article, descriptive-analytical methodology with the aim of examining two categories of defective governance and optimal governance. The findings and conclusions show that the development and progress as well as the backwardness of any nation is rooted in the country's governance. It is the quality and function of governance that determines whether governance is desirable or defective. Good governance requires the use of a set of policies and strategies in order to increase the efficiency and performance of the government in satisfying the people, also increasing the competition in the political and economic fields, as well as making the government more responsive and efficient and modern. Defective governance, which occurs by putting pressure on the people and imposing the desires of the rulers on different strata, causes a decrease in national satisfaction and a decrease in the performance as well as inefficiency of the government compared to other competing countries. In defective governance, those who have more qualifications and professional competence are left aside and those who have less competence take over the administration of the country's affairs. The results of this article will be able to evaluate, guide or modify a wide range of actions needed in the field of governance in the form of recommendations and policy packages.

The issue of efficiency is one of the most challenging issues in the field of political science, which is more important in the Islamic Republic of Iran due to the religious nature of the government.  As  regards efficiency is a value category, it is necessary to study it based on the theoretical foundations of any political system. Accordingly, in this article, an attempt has been made to study the discourse of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution about the efficiency of the religious political system and answer the question, what are the components of the efficiency of the religious political system in the discourse of the Supreme Leader?. The Practical Discourse Analysis Method (PDAM) has been used as a method. The theoretical model of the research is based on 4-level analysis of efficiency (idea, structure, agent and performance). The analysis of the Supreme Leader's discourse shows that his main idea is the category of Islamic government based on Velayat-e-Faqih, and the efficiency of the political system at the four levels is also based on this idea. Components such as responding to the needs of the time at the idea level, structure based on justice and competence at the structural level, simplicity and courage at the agent level, and legalism at the performance level have been identified as efficiency components.

Lack of coordination between the establishment and efficiency of criminal laws and basic principles and regulations has deprived the criminal laws of the necessary efficiency and effectiveness and has led to rooting in efficiency criteria from a religious and customary point of view. It has been shown that disregarding these criteria and principles can be effective in criminal factors, especially social ones. Criteria, such as compliance with the principle of necessity and appropriateness, compliance with the reference laws, and attention to national norms and international norms, are among the cases that appear futile if ignored, and irregular rules are established without considering the mass of abandoned laws and non liquet. In some cases, despite a large number of laws, in some cases, it faces a signficant non liquet, which is examined in this paper using a descriptive-analytical method. This research includes representing the current status of criminal laws and providing some suggestions in establishing laws based on the effective factors in the occurrence of crime and existing criteria.

The efficiency of the Islamic system is one of the most important concerns of sympathizers and Islamic thinkers. But this efficiency needs to have a criterion and an indicator, the rule of Imam Ali (AS) as a successful model in governance that has many admirers, can express the indicators of the efficiency of the Islamic system in various layers, including fundamental And express an application. The product of this example is a very friendly, humane and honorable relationship with the people. How the relationship between the ruler and the people is based on love and honor is rooted in the three principles of morality, justice and security. Confirms the existence of these three principles; Wisdoms, letters and short words mentioned by the pious Imam Ali (AS) in Nahj al-Balaghah. The re-reading of the three principles mentioned in Nahj al-Balaghah, while stating the religious roots in their argument, also shows the foundations of the desired model of government in Islamic civilization. therefore; It is necessary to re-read the position of the three mentioned principles in Nahj al-Balaghah and the governing tradition of Imam Ali (AS). The present study examines information qualitatively, library-wise and descriptively-analytically.

The virtual government is a new framework with a high capability and ability to increase the political legitimacy of political systems at the international level. In the Islamic Republic, which in recent years is facing some kind of concern for the issue of political legitimacy, Richard Rosecrance` virtual government theory with what changes and with which localized components is capable of helping to promote the political legitimacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran? The finding of this analytical and decriptive study show that localization of virtual government and limiting it to national level and mixing it with religious teachings would improve the efficiency of the Islamic Republic and help the system overcome the upcoming crises.

The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between good governance and economic-social development, emphasizing the seventh document of development, from the perspective of university professors and doctoral students of Mazandaran University. In this article, two methods of survey research and grounded theory have been used. The statistical population consists of students on the one hand and professors specializing in the field of economic-social development on the other hand. The statistical population is all undergraduate, master's and doctoral students in the fields of sociology, political science, economics and law studying in Mazandaran University who are studying in the first half of 2011. The validity of the questionnaire has been assessed with face validity and data reliability using test, retest and Cronbach's alpha test. In surveying the data collection tool, a researcher-made questionnaire was used, and semi-structured interviews were used in the qualitative study. Hypotheses are formulated using the theory of good governance. The findings of the article indicate the existence of a strong meaningful relationship between the components of good governance (participation variables, rule of law, etc.). Also, specialization, elitism and innovation as intervening conditions and single-product economy lead to trust, cohesion, support and social participation, and the consequences of such actions and reactions are welfare, security, social justice and public education. According to these findings, it can be concluded that in good governance, giving priority to valid measures for political and administrative accountability, the freedom of the targeted and efficient judiciary, the freedom of information and the effective functioning of government organizations are of fundamental importance in the comprehensive development process of the country.

One of the most important things to know the government is to measure its efficiency. Efficiency expresses the degree of success of the government, especially in the executive branch, to achieve its specific goals, and it also expresses the degree of its effectiveness, which comes about through different institutions and with different mechanisms. In this research, Rouhani's government, known as the government of prudence and hope, has been examined considering two important indicators of rule of law and legitimacy. The main question of this research is how the efficiency of the government, based on two indicators of rule of law and legitimacy, was measured in Rouhani's government and how was it? This research, using descriptive-analytical method, has come to the conclusion that in the field of rule of law index, Rouhani's performance was always in the red state and his limited efforts to improve the existing indicators in this field were met with failure. Regarding the legitimacy of the Rouhani government, it was related to the position of the general public. At this point, the majority of Iranian citizens reached the stage of indifference towards the country's political issues, especially participation in the elections, due to the weak management performance of the government and the type of protests faced in 1996-1998.

Although the systems of responsibility each have their own specific functions and goals, but in some cases these systems are not efficient and the island activity of each of the systems of responsibility has not led to the desired result, so given the dynamics and The fluidity of society in the shadow of maintaining the boundaries of systems of responsibility, the interaction of these systems in order to evolve as much as possible, is considered important. According to the findings of this study, in cases where civil liability is not effective and deterrent, criminal liability can be sought. Accordingly, in choosing the type of dealing with legal phenomena, but also in choosing the intensity of action, one should pay attention to the conditions and developments in society. It should be noted that criminalizing acts that were previously civil does not mean denying or denying restorative justice. Rather, in order to complete the theory of restorative justice and attention to society and its impact on the occurrence of crime, in cases where the conditions of society, it is necessary to deal with some civil violations by some guarantee of criminal enforcement, such an action is allowed.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of employees using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. The statistical population of the research was 85 people and the sample of 61 people included all the staff units of one of the companies. Questionnaire and human resources database of the headquarters were used to collect data. The research method was descriptive and survey. We used fuzzy data envelopment analysis and axial input model to analyze the data. The results showed that out of the total sample of 61, 23 are efficient management employees (0.23), 3 are on the efficient frontier (0.09) and 35 are inefficient (0.7).This indicates the low level of productivity and efficiency in the decision-making units of the company, which in order to improve productivity and efficiency, requires staff training and attracting specialized personnel, which must be more carefully planned or choose alternative methods.which in order to improve productivity and efficiency.

The purpose of the present study, as part of the doctoral dissertation in accounting, is to design a contingency model of multiple path analysis of the impact of performance auditing as a scientific, efficient (introverted), result-oriented and feedback (output) approach in monitoring, improving political accountability. Executive bodies (studied in the Court of Accounts of Iran). The research method is deductive-inductive and correlational research and in terms of inference method, descriptive-analytical and in terms of research design, survey and applied in terms of research purpose, for this purpose by studying journals, articles and specialized books related to research. Guidance and consultation with experienced professors and expert auditors of the Court of Audit, questions based on research variables for (3) hypotheses in the form of two researcher-made five-point Likert questionnaires, both of which due to Cronbach's high alpha coefficient (0.92 for performance auditing) And 0.93 to improve political accountability), have the ability of content validity and high reliability, prepared and after approval in the Committee for Standards and Guidelines of Government Audit of the Court of Audit and in the period from spring 1396 to spring 1399, among the sample The research statistics were distributed and collected using Cochran's formula (357) people and including managers, auditors and experts of the Court of Audit of the country and provinces

efficiency in any structure and organization as one of the important goals of that organization includes its essential nature (including tasks and missions with specialized and exclusive aspects) and its importance and sensitivity to the middle and strategic management levels and in the next stages. Employees and human resources are transferred, and in the way of fulfilling this need, the use of a set of factors and components are influential, which motivation and motivational topics are considered as an influential factor in improving organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Security organizations, as one of the types of organizations, are not exempt from the general rules explained.

The current research, focusing on analyzing the role of motivation in improving the efficiency of intelligence and security organizations, tries to ask the question, what is the relationship between the level of motivation management and the efficiency of the organization? Using the descriptive, correlational and experimental method, he analyzed the information collected by the library study technique, personal experience, interview and questionnaire (open and closed questions) from the statistical community of experts and related to the field of research until finally, the research hypothesis based on to prove the existence of a meaningful relationship between motivation and productivity in intelligence-security collections in a documented and substantiated manner.

The studied results indicated that it is important that the motivational management can use the resources, facilities, capacities, capabilities, forces and opportunities optimally, to the same extent that it will witness the development and increase of efficiency in the organization (in particular, intelligence- security sets) and on the contrary, if these resources, facilities, human resources, etc. are not used properly by motivation management in the system, we will witness a decrease in efficiency in the organization.