جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « hamas » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

This operation in the border area between Gaza and the occupied territories of Palestine began on 15 Mehr 1402 (October 7, 2023) and is still ongoing. Despite the historical record of fighting against the Zionist regime, this issue is somehow considered a significant security and political crisis for the usurping regime of Israel after the recent tensions in the Middle East. This research is in a library form to investigate the effects of the Al-Aqsa storm on the security crisis of the resistance, and the necessary information has been collected from internet sources and current articles. For this reason, the question is, what effect has Al-Aqsa storm had on Israel's security and political crisis? The hypothesis of the work that has been done using the theory of defensive realism states that the Al-Aqsa storm caused many crises such as; 1- Political crisis (decrease in legitimacy and popularity of Netanyahu's government at the domestic and international level); 2- Social crisis, (immigration of Jews to European countries and America) 3- Economic crisis; (reduction in income, imports, exports due to shipping crisis in the sea Red and...) 4- Security crisis; (Psychological insecurity in the country, stress among the people and the military, national insecurity and physical war inside the cities...) and in front of the member countries, the axis of resistance has arisen by creating convergence in order to strengthen their cooperation in the military-political-security dimension. are

Al-Aqsa storm operation can be considered the biggest, most important and most fruitful operation of Palestinian groups against the Zionist regime in the last 75 years, which will change not only the security equations under the Shamat region, but also the security-political architecture of the entire West Asian region. Al-Aqsa storm is considered a big intelligence-security failure for the Zionist regime, which was immersed in the glory of having a powerful and invincible military-security apparatus, and this will also change many of the constructions that were formed about the Zionist regime. Based on this, The article, using descriptive-analytical method and using library and documentary sources, seeks to answer the question of what consequences the Al-Aqsa storm operation had on the national security of israel? The hypothesis of the research is that the operations of Palestinian groups on October 7 had negative consequences on the national security of the Zionist regime in military, political, social and economic dimensions. Based on this, the findings of the research show that The operations of Palestinian groups on October 7, 2023, not only had domestic and regional consequences for the Zionist regime, but also threatened the national security of this regime from international dimensions, and the inefficiency of the intelligence apparatus of the Zionist regime, as well as the non-fulfillment of the military doctrine of this regime, in addition to internal problems and economic, as well as the challenge in the field of foreign policy after the Al-Aqsa storm operation, has overshadowed the pillars of the national security of the Zionist regime in various dimensions. It can create fundamental and long-term challenges for the Zionist regime in the future.

The foregoing research is to investigate What approach the Zionist regime has taken after the October 7th, 2023 events against “hamas” and in general Palestinians living in Gaza.
the Research is based on qualitative, interpretive method, and for data collection is used library resources and articles and scientific analysis of cyberspace databases.
Using Foucault, Schmidt and Giorgio Agambens’ theoretical concepts about the mechanisms of social control based on biopolitical and thanatopolitic approach; The findings show that the Zionist regime has been trying to do in recent months, given the lack of existential legitimacy and subsequent threats perceived by Palestinian resistance groups to its ontological security or historical existence, in the form of a thanatopolitic approach, redefine and reproduce the rule of "exception", and strategies such as; Othering (inhumanization, animalization) and securitization of space, location and identity, has led the people of Gaza as "Homosacer" or an inverted subject of biopolitics in "Bare life" (the position of death and elimination, and at best, in a minimal form of life); the subjects based on the regulations and orders issued by the Zionist regime's repressive Aparatus in exception; the daily forms of repression and, according to Agamben, are exposed to victimization and elimination without punishment.
The result of this study based on the latest Palestinian survey shows that despite the intensity and extent of the thanatopolitic mechanism employed by the Zionist regime towards the Gaza people and the many calamities that have suffered during the recent war, the Palestinian people, especialy Gaza strip, while supporting hamas, continue to adhere to the original aspirations of the “Resistance groups” as well as the sovereignty of the Palestinian people over the occupied territories.

Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023 in response to more than seven decades of occupation and enduring many injuries and pains. Israel responded to the invasion by trampling all the rules of humanitarian law and attacking civilians, schools and hospitals, several thousand killed women and children and displaced civilians in Gaza.(problem)Various countries, including Turkey, reacted to this conflict. The purpose of writing this article is to explain Erdogan's foreign policy towards this conflict. Therefore, the question of the article is: What is Turkey? Has he adopted a policy regarding the conflict between Hamas and Israel in 2023? The hypothesis of this research, which is tried to be proven with descriptive and analytical (methodology,) is: Turkey's foreign policy towards the conflict between Hamas and Israel in 2023 is based on pragmatism and self-interested political action. In this way, on the one hand, it wants the continuation of relations with Israel in the political, economic and security fields, and on the other hand, it is trying to gain popularity and leadership in the Islamic world by adopting a declaratory policy and supporting rhetoric towards Palestine. The (findings) of this research indicate that It is that despite the tension-causing rhetoric and conflicts such as the Palestinian issue, in practice the relations between Turkey and Israel have maintained relative stability.

More than a decade has passed since the concept of smart power to political literature and the sphere of international policy studies. This concept was initially on the agenda of the transformation of power relations at the level of state actors, but due to the growth of the power achievements of non-state actors, the application of this concept expanded. The achievements of non-state actors Hamas and Hezbollah, particularly their deterrence power and success in the 33-day, 22-day, and 12-day wars against the Zionist regime over the past decades, have been considered a turning point for the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hamas and Hezbollah are two Islamic resistance movements that emerged in the 1980s inspired by the intellectual foundations and ideology of political Islam, Shiite values and the Iranian Islamic Revolution. Hamas in Palestine and Hezbollah in Lebanon, non-governmental actors and regional allies of the Islamic Republic have put their declarative principles on the line in the fight against the Zionist regime and are trying to destroy the Israeli regime and reclaim the rights of the Palestinians from the Zionists. They see lasting resistance as the only way to defeat Israel and the great Western powers in the region Since its inception, the Islamic Republic of Iran has based its foreign policy on hatred of the Israeli regime, opposition to and combating the policy of Western powers, support for liberation movements, especially support for the Palestinian people in the region.
 The purpose of this study was to investigate and explain the software and hardware achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah and its impact on Iran's regional position in the Middle East during 2005-2021.Based on this, the research question is, what impact has hamas and Hezbollah's software and hardware achievements had on Iran's regional position in the Middle East?
The present research method is an explanatory method and the conceptual approach of smart power has been used. The method of collecting information and data was also library and internet.
The concept of smart power entered the political literature and international policy studies in the early 20th century. This concept was initially considered by the policy makers and decision makers of the foreign policy of the United States of America; But gradually it was noticed by other governmental and non-governmental actors. Hamas and Hezbollah are two Islamic resistance movements that emerged in the 1980s inspired by the intellectual foundations and ideology of political Islam, Shiite values, and the Islamic Revolution of Iran. Hamas in Palestine and Hezbollah in Lebanon, one of the non-governmental actors of the regional united Islamic Republic, have put their declared principles in the line of struggle against Israel and are seeking the destruction of Israel and the recapture of Palestinian disputes and farms from the hands of the Zionists, and they are the only solution to overcome and Victory over Israel and the great western powers in the region consider resistance and standing stable. From the very beginning, the Islamic Republic of Iran has drawn its foreign policy policy on hatred and aversion to Israel, opposing and fighting the policy of Western powers, supporting liberation movements, especially supporting the Palestinian people in the region.
The Islamic Republic of Iran defined and considered Israel as an illegitimate and occupying regime and the role of Western powers, especially the United States of America, as interventionist actors causing instability in the region. With the revelation of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic and its support for the Islamic resistance axis of Hamas and Hezbollah, it faced obstacles and pressure from the opposing actors, namely the regional governments of Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the extra-regional government of the United States of America; But what has increased the intensity of concerns and anger of the opposition actors against the Islamic Republic over the past decades, has been the power gains of Hamas and Hezbollah. So that in the past decades, the software and hardware achievements of the two Islamic resistance movements, Hamas and Hezbollah, have expanded. in a way that has surprised even their opponents.
Hamas and Hezbollah are regional allies of the Islamic Republic and Iran supports them. Iran is located in a region that has been subjected to pressures and disruptions from opposing actors. On the other hand, these opposition actors are worried about the growth of the power of non-governmental actors united in the Islamic Republic. Based on this, in this research, while describing and explaining the software and hardware achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah in the region, we will discuss their effects on the regional position of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Middle East.
The findings indicate that the software and hardware achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah as two regionally allied non-governmental actors of the Islamic Republic of Iran had grown, which had a positive impact on Iran's regional position in the Middle East.

The results indicate that the increase in the smart power of Hamas and Hezbollah has increased the influence and bargaining power and ensured security for Iran against opposition actors such as Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States in the Middle East.
In this article, we discussed the growth of the achievements of two main and powerful Islamic resistance movements, Hamas and Hezbollah, and its impact on Iran's regional position in the Middle East, and we analyzed and evaluated that the Islamic Republic of Iran has not recognized Israel since its inception and considered itself a supporter of the people. Palestine had defined. Hamas and Hezbollah emerged in Palestine and Lebanon, respectively, inspired by the intellectual foundations of political Islam and especially the Islamic Revolution in the 1990s, and drew their vital principles in the front line against Israel and victory against it.
In the past decades, the software and hardware achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah had grown. Regarding the software achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah, we can mention the increase in popularity of these actors in their country and the region. He also mentioned about the hardware achievements of Hamas and Hezbollah, deterrence power, missiles and drones and their victory against Israel in the past decades. Considering that the presence of these actors has a deep strategic importance, especially guaranteeing security for Tehran in the region, without a doubt, any software and hardware growth of the power of Hamas and Hezbollah is beneficial to the Islamic Republic against the regional and extra-regional actors who wanted to contain Iran and their bargaining power and influence. It has promoted Iran in the region and made any peace in the Middle East inevitable without the presence and participation of Tehran.

The Al-Aqsa operation, which was carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023, has changed the nature and process of many developments in the West Asian region. The purpose of this article is to analyze the aforementioned operations and the subsequent developments on the compromise process and especially the Ibrahim agreement, which was being implemented with the prospect of strengthening relations between the Zionist regime and the Arab countries. In this regard, the main question of the article is: "What effect does the operation of Al-Aqsa storm and the subsequent killing of the Palestinian people have on the process of reconciliation negotiations between the Zionist regime and the Arab countries?" The hypothesis of the article is formulated as follows: "The Al-Aqsa storm operation will stop the process of normalizing the relations of some Arab countries with the Zionist regime, and contrary to the predictions of the designers of the Ibrahim agreement, it will not change the cold peace into a warm peace." The findings of the article indicate that the further disclosure of the aims and nature of the Zionist regime during Hamas operations and the accumulation of hatred towards this regime, the process of cold peace will be stopped until the mid-term future and warm peace considering the position of Palestine among the public opinion of the countries that Their officials are trying to implement the expansion of Ibrahim's agreement, will not be realized.

After 30 years since the establishment, and experiencing 11 years of governing over Gaza Strip, Hamas, has published a new document in 1 May 2017, consist of an introduction, 42 articles, and 12 titles, by which it has presented a new discourse suggesting new strategies. This new document has six more articles comparing to one published in 1988. This document is interpreted as a constitution law for Hamas and cannot be considered as a plan or initiative. A document which brought messages to foe and friend, within or outside of the Palestine borders.
Fighting in the front line, it is certain that Hamas has adopted a resistance approach against usurper Zionist Regime In recent decades, and any kind of action on behalf of Hamas would affect on Palestine equations, within or outside of its borders, and could encourage active regional actors to react.
It took two years to codify this new document, according to Khaled Mashaal; rigorous attention has been paid in selecting words, articles, and titles, showing the consensus of Hamas leaders and its institutions within or outside of Palestine. This document faced various responses in different circles. Having a brief study of the recent document, it is interpreted that it suggests a quite Political – Legal discourse in relative to first covenant which presented an ideological discourse; of course, the recent one looks more strategic. Considering the importance of the topic, it is tried to investigate this document through various aspects, its release reasons and its implications, hence one can illustrate its dark and bright points more precisely.

Hamas, popular movement - National is trying to pave the way for freedom and liberation from the oppression of the Palestinian people and the release of the occupied territories and confront the Zionist project provides support powers. Hence, strategies for establishing a government tries to adopt and implement Dravrd.dr located in the territory of the Palestinian state, a process that should be done in stages after liberation. Therefore, Hamas is seeking to political legitimacy in this land, promote. That is why the political and military measures put in your activity list Who believes they are doing jihad and martyrdom believe is possible. Thus, the question is whether the two components of the vision system _ an act of jihad and martyrdom in this movement is what meaning What is the role of each in the process of state-building?. It seems that the three categories of resistance Hamas in the political culture, identity and freedom Based Islamic Arabic _ is, jihad and martyrdom, a tool to fight the occupation forces and the liberation of the occupied territories. After dissecting the two components of the system of thought Hamas descriptive survey, it became clear look Jihad movement, which includes both civilian and military actions with respect to that eventually, lead to martyrdom, high sanctity is. In this regard, the eyes of Hamas, the two components referred to as the gateway to the state-building process are considered.

In this article we examine the similarities and differences between the political thought of the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, and the political thought of the result of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, which now dominates the political system of the Islamic Republic of Iran is discussed. The aim of this study was to observe the distance and remoteness in or near these two Islamist According to the intellectual foundations of the Islamic world is their view of the political agenda. It also examines the capabilities and areas of understanding and cooperation between the Islamic Republic of Iran with Hamas and even the opposition parties do not cooperate. At the beginning of the study objectives, activities, principles of thought and of Hamas's organizational structure We have a fairly complete understanding of the Palestinian movement. Then, based on nine criteria and indicators Extracted from Islamic political thought in analyzing the similarities and differences of political thought Hamas will deal with the political thought of the Islamic Revolution.

With the beginning of the crisis in Syria, Hamas Movement wich has always enjoyed Syrian goverument's Full support, gradually distanced from it transferring its offices from Damascus to Doha, while, Hamas leaders embarked on criticizing Syria and Hezbollah. This Paper aims to examine the reasons behind separation of Hamas from Resistance Axis. In addition, this study tries to investigate the factors that led to hamas divergence from Syrian government and Resistance Axis at the peak of the Syria crisis. It will also try to predict Hamas's political future. Results of this paper show that identical, Ideological and political otherness have been effective in the political behavior of Hamas leaders. Furthermore it shows that the fall of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the stabilization of the Syrian government, has made Hamas to return back to the Resistance Axis.

After three decades, Iran and Egypt still lack formal diplomatic relations. Bilateral diplomatic relations had been severed in 1979 and the other time in 1960. The main question raised by the article is what factors are involved in divergence in Iran-Egypt relations since the advent of the Islamic Revolution to the Arab revolutions. Within the past three decades, the orientation of the two states towards the United States and Israel, Egypt’s support for Iraq during the latter’s imposed war on Iran, and Iran’s sponsorship of Hamas and Hezbollah have given rise to creation of a threat perception in the two states about each other and subsequently divergence between the two states. It appears that the 2011 revolution in Egypt has brought about delicate changes in Egyptian foreign policy, paving the way for the restoration of diplomatic relations between the two nations.

Russia’s relations with Hamas organization are very important. On the one hand, the organization is on the list of terrorist organizations in the United States and Europe while, on the other hand, Moscow’s relations with this Palestinian group are characterized by a host of political contradictions. Hamas, at least in words, has always supported Islamist movements across the world, including the Chechen separatist movement in North Caucasus. Following the second war with Chechnya, the Kremlin has been always warning about a new plot to establish Islamic caliphate. However, despite opposition of the United States and Israel, which have close ties with Moscow, relations between Hamas and Russia have been on the rise since the organization was established. The present research tries to answer this question: Why Russia considers relations with Hamas important? To answer that question, their relations as well as various grounds, factors, goals and consequences of those relations have been studied. Evidence shows that by expanding ties with Hamas and playing the role of a balancing factor, Russia has been trying to disturb the United States unilateral world order and improve its position as an effective international power.

The main objective of this article is to know the role of Islamic movements in strengthening the Islamic identity in the arena of globalization with emphasis on Islamic movements in Palestine. Today, globalization has profound influences on the culture and identity of the various ethnic and religious communities in the dimensions. In this process of preserving the Islamic identity of alien invasion and strengthen those of particular importance. Among the factors that affect this, contemporary Islamic movements in the Islamic world, especially the Palestinian Islamic movement. During the recent century is the subject of Palestine and for the defense of the Islamic identity of the most important discussions of the political world. To identifying symbols, such as "it is also an important place in the struggles of the people of Palestine and Islamic movements such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad movements it. On this basis, this article uses a method of studies documents in answer to three questions. The result of studies show that as a result of the lack of efficiency of the nationalistic ideology and the Socialist, the Palestinians have shown most attentions Islamic identity restoration and strengthening itself, and Resistance bands are also in the fight against the enemy occupying have earned the success. For example it can be pointed out to the achievements of the first intifada, the Al-Aqsa Mosque intifada and resistance of Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups in during 22 days of war, and the Islam world support of them. This campaign not only in rural rehabilitation and strengthening of the Islamic identity of the Palestinians but also strengthen the identity and solidarity of Muslims, the growth and expansion of the flow of Islamic awakening in the Arab States has been effective in the era of globalization.

The confrontation between Hamas and Faith in West Bank and Gaza Strip showcase the long challenges among nationalism and Islamism in Arab world. This confrontation is a symbol of two ideologies which had a concurrence in the history of Middle East. Despite this confrontation in the current days, the Islamist and nationalist forces had a consensus to make a combat against Israel as an occupied country in the beginning of its establishments. Meanwhile the new differences among Palestinian parties are so hard and violent which cannot be solved easily. Of course the idealism of Hamas and popularity of Faith could lead this dual confrontation to this result in which no one can eliminate the other and respecting the democratic values and conciliation with the political realities is the best ways for the two parties.