جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "iran's islamic revolution" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

Iran's Islamic Revolution as a rare phenomenon that led to deep changes has been interpreted many times. This revolution challenged the two camps of socialism and liberalism due to the lack of commitment to the East and the West and the introduction of the Islamic Republic as a form of government for the first time in the world. Religious democracy, justice and religious authority were among the semantic systems and discourse elements of Iran's Islamic Revolution, which, along with internal developments, became the basis for a trend of events and developments at the world level, especially in Islamic societies. This revolution has had the greatest effect on the advancement of Shia political discourse and has caused its transformation from a static state to a dynamic state. Although this revolution affected all Islamic countries, the most important of them was Iraq, an important Shiite country in the Islamic world. This article examines the impact of the Islamic Revolution on the Shia political discourse in Iraq, and for this purpose, the combination of the discourse method of Lacla and Moff and the diffusion theory has been used as an analytical model for the Islamic Revolution. The impact of Iran's Islamic Revolution on the Shiite political discourse in Iraq during Saddam's time was the discourse of resistance. But after his fall, initially due to the disappearance of the main enemy, the discourse of resistance was also challenged. But under the guidance and leadership of authority and the absence of Saddam's severe repression

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the independence of its republics had significant effects on the policies of the neighboring countries in various political, cultural, economic and social fields, so that each of the neighbors tried to establish deep relations with these countries based on their interests. In this regard, the Republic of Azerbaijan, as one of the newly independent countries, due to its geopolitical, geoeconomic and geocultural position, was able to attract the attention of countries such as Iran and Turkey in order to strengthen their relations with the government and people of Azerbaijan. Due to the establishment of secular governments in the Republic of Azerbaijan, Islamic movements have not yet been able to provide a suitable model for adapting their Islamic and national values. Therefore, the Republic of Azerbaijan is witnessing the confrontation of different discourses to model political relations. This research seeks to answer the main question, what is the contrast between the discourse of Shia political Islam, especially the discourse influenced by the Islamic Revolution of Iran, and the discourse of Turkish neo-Ottomanism in the Republic of Azerbaijan? The current research is based on the theoretical framework of the discourse and the application of the descriptive-analytical qualitative method. Considering that Shiite political Islam and Ottomanism each have elements and components of the same discourse, they can be analyzed in the form of discourse analysis. Discourse analysis can be considered as the discovery of apparent and hidden meanings in discourse streams that appear in different linguistic and meta-linguistic forms. The findings show that the discourse of Shia political Islam is an authentic discourse in the Republic of Azerbaijan and the discourse of Ottomanism is considered as a rival discourse. Thus, as we have stated, each discourse has a central sign and floating signs that make it cohesive. The central sign of Shia political Islam discourse is velayat al-faqih. Also, the floating signifiers of this discourse can be considered as republic and government, rule of law, justice, independence, freedom, anti-tyranny. On the other hand, the central signifier of the discourse of Ottomanism can be considered as liberal political Islam. This type of Islamism entered Turkey's political arena with the victory of the Justice and Development Party in the parliamentary elections of 2002. Liberal political Islam believes that the majority of Islamic rulings are in the field of individual rulings and issues, and Islam does not have a plan for political and social management, and only a small part of it is in the field of government. Liberal political Islam believes in the secularity of the Turkish government, but opposes the removal of religious symbols from public places, such as banning women's hijab in public places. They are not trying to establish an Islamic government. In fact, they have a kind of conservative Islam. Also, nationalism, secular government, democracy and balanced relationship with East and West are the floating signifiers of the discourse of neo-Ottomanism. Considering that the political system of the Republic of Azerbaijan is secular on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is considered the second Shia country in the world, the Islamic Republic tried to support the Shia people of Azerbaijan and finally strengthen its relations with the Republic of Azerbaijan. In this regard, it also took extensive measures, but the government of Azerbaijan, by changing its foreign policy approach, turned towards the Zionist regime, the West, and Turkey, and also narrowed the space for Shiite Islamists and tried to suppress them. For example, the Islamic Party in the Republic of Azerbaijan, despite the cancellation of its activity license by the government and the arrest of its leaders, has always shown that it has a high level of mobilization ability and enjoys relatively wide support. Therefore, it is considered a significant threat to the government and as a result, it plays an important role in the political life of this country. At the same time, Turkey is promoting and promoting its liberal political Islam model in Azerbaijan with the tendencies of neo-Ottomanism. The influence of the secular reading of Islamism and the religious tolerance of Ottomanism is growing among the young generation and Muslim intellectuals. Despite the restrictions placed on the Shiite parties, the government of Azerbaijan has not imposed any ban on the activities of secular Islamism in Turkey and on the contrary has officially supported them. In fact, this movement has kept itself away from any political confrontation and has pretended that it is not seeking to overthrow the political structure of Azerbaijan. In general, it can be said that there is a kind of indirect confrontation between these two political-Shia-Islam discourses based on velayat-faqih and the liberal political Islam of Ottomanism in the Republic of Azerbaijan.

With the collapse of the former Soviet Union, a unipolar system led by the United States was formed at the international level. In this period of time, American foreign policies developed from the expansion of military bases in different regions, intervention in civil, regional and proxy wars, etc. The formation of emerging powers such as China and Russia, successive failures in the countries of the West Asian region, as well as the inability to confront Iran as an influential political and security country in the region, became the grounds for the decline of American power at the international level. This research is a descriptive-analytical study and the data collection method is library. In this research, we will discuss the decline of America in the West Asian region and the role of the Islamic Revolution in the defense thought of Imam Khamenei. The findings of the research show that after the Islamic revolution, the Supreme Leader expressed the theory of resistance and opposition to the hegemonic policies of America from Iran, and this policy was implemented in Islamic Iran. In this regard, the Islamic Republic tried to expand the theory of resistance. The Imam and the Supreme Leader played an irreplaceable and fundamental role in shaping the theory of resistance and people's convergence with it, and ultimately they shaped the causes of the decline of American power at the regional and international level.

Although theoretical modeling seeks to explain revolutions as possible as simple, they are amongst the most complicated human phenomena. Despite common features in terms of the beginning, procedure, and outcomes, revolutions differ considerably. Considering the similarities and differences between revolutions leads to understanding the contextual and intellectual characteristics, the agents, and the kind of mass activism in revolutions. There have been various divisions about revolutions. Samuel Huntington’s simple division about revolutions, i.e. the Western and the Eastern, has been paid attention to in reviewing Iran`s Islamic Revolution. He divides revolutions into two general types based on some particular characteristics. In which category does the Islamic revolution fall into this duality and how efficient is this modeling in formulating and analyzing the Islamic revolution? To respond to the question, the paper hypothesizes that Iran`s Islamic Revolution shows similarities to the Western type and fundamental differences with the Eastern type. Although in this analysis, the authors also criticize this modeling in the analysis of the Islamic Revolution. To explain the hypothesis, the paper conducts a comparative-historical method for analyzing the library-based data of the research.

Geopolitical threats are a type of threats that threaten the security and national interests of countries based on existing geopolitical factors and realities. In the meantime, due to its own identity and geopolitics, the Republic of Iran has been threatened and even violated in many cases in the first step of the Islamic Revolution. But in the end, despite the political, economic and military-security ups and downs, he was able to repel the threats and even turn some of them into opportunities and take effective steps in the direction of shaping the desired regional geopolitical order. But now, at the beginning of the second step of the Islamic Revolution, step by step with the progress and successes achieved in the domestic and international arenas, the enmity of the enemies of identity and power has become more visible, the fields of threats have become wider and the horizon of confrontation has become clearer. The current situation and conditions and the prospects ahead in the second step of the Islamic revolution have doubled the need to recognize the regional geopolitical threats against Iran. Therefore, in this research, the trend of the evolution of the geopolitical order in the Southwest Asia region has been investigated and analyzed with the method of qualitative analysis, and further, based on the GT method, the main categories of text extraction, existing and emerging threats against the existence J.A. Iran and the existence of the Islamic Revolution, explained and based on the Strauss-Corbin systematic model, effective strategies to deal with geopolitical threats have been presented.Ukraine's military doctrine is changing from "defensive to deterrence and becoming offensive." Russia's military doctrine has changed from "offensive to defensive" in some areas.

Revolutionary states challenged the values and norms governing the conduct of foreign after the victory because of unfair and Undesirable. They want to change the status quo in domestic and international arena and replace it with values that are favorable and fair. Iran's Islamic Revolution is also not excluded from this total. Thus, they began to opposed the existing values and norms and demanded that they be replaced by Islamic norms. The authors of this article, using descriptive-analytical method and library resources, seek to answer why the leaders of the Islamic Revolution of Iran oppose the norms governing the international system and in response to the hypothesis that the religious attitude of the revolutionary leaders to the international system They challenged the constituent elements of the existing international system and its values and demanded their replacement with Islamic values and norms. Because these values are based on Western and non-religious values. Also, the promoters of these values do not have the necessary credibility, and their purpose in raising these issues is to put pressure on other countries.

The emphasis of the Supreme Leader on the issue of Modern Islamic Civilization could be understand in the Lectures. Therefore, his concern for the future of the Islamic Republic of Iran reveals the need for the attention and efforts of researchers in the field of Modern Islamic Civilization. Modeling the lifestyle of influential personalities of the society under the name of "school" is one of the most important measures for the formation of a new Modern Islamic Civilization. Because the existence of exemplary personalities, as a stimulus for attitudes, plays an important role in educating and making human beings in society. In this regard, the personality model of Martyr Soleimani, which extends beyond the borders of Iran, became the founder of a school that was named "Haj Qassem School" by Imam Khamenei. This article, while examining the personality dimensions of Martyr Soleimani, seeks to answer the question: what are the most important components of the Martyr Soleimani School in order to achieve a modern Islamic civilization? According to the research hypothesis, martyr Soleimani as a transcendent model of an influential personality has prominent features in line with the pillars of the formation of Modern Islamic Civilization. That "Sincerity" as the most important feature along with "Unitarianism" and "Protection of National Interests", there are three main components of this school. The research is a thematic analysis method and library methods has been used to data collection.

The purpose of the present research is to study the relationship between Iran’s Islamic Revolution and the formation of the Axis of Resistance in giving identity to Lebanon’s Hizbullāh. The main hypothesis is that the Islamic and Shi’ite identity of Iran’s Revolution having some criteria such as soft power could have give identity to the Shi’ite movement of Lebanon’s Hizbullāh and emphasize on the spirit of seeking martyrdom, religion-centeredness, Shi’ite symbolism, belief in Wilāt-i Faqīh, and battle against the hegemony in regional aspects. The method of study was descriptive analysis and the results showed that the cultural, Shi’ite, political, and geographical features have expanded the identity that Iran’s Islamic Revolution has given to Lebanon’s Hizbullāh.

"Why and how did the Islamic Revolution of Iran win?" This is a question that has been discussed for many decades and nowadays, and various scholars have sought to answer it. So far, different approaches and generations of views about the Islamic Revolution have been born and different explanations have been given in this regard. This research focuses on the study and analysis of articles published in the four scientific journals of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, namely, the Quarterly Journal of the Islamic Revolution, the Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Approaches, Quarterly Journal of the Islamic Revolution Studies, and the Quarterly of the Islamic Revolution's Research from the beginning to the end of the publications of 2018 year. The purpose of this study is to review the published articles and find out what Iranian scholars have identified as to why and how the Islamic Revolution of Iran won, and what are the characteristics of the researchers who have produced this literature? In fact, the main focus of the present study is the transformation of the field studies and how the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in two areas of research knowledge and characteristics of researchers.

Discourse is a concept of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary and is the most complex concepts of our time. For Laclau and Mouffe, discourse is signs that articulated around a nodal point. Discourse is a tool that gives meaning to the universe. Iran's Islamic Revolution is one of the most controversial contemporary world's revolution. Scholars have different ideas about how to shape and occurrence of this revolution have provided. In this article we attend to with concept of Radical Pluralism Democracy of laclau and Moufee studies Iran's Islamic Revolution. Constitutional Revolution as a democratic revolution was the beginning of democracy in Iran. Since then, temporary block against forms of domination and oppression have shaped and activities and Islamic Revolution is one of the temporary blocks for democracy in Iran. In this temporary block, opposition gathered in different discourses. Discourses in this temporary block, by creating a chain of equivalence could maintain their unity and independence. By fixing meanings of the Islamic Revolution and the collapse of the Pahlavi discourse, chain of equivalence replaced by the antagonism that cause conflict and political discourse of the Iranian government in the field of social discourse. Pluralist Radical democracy created numerous subjectivity position and at the same time, each subject to continuous calls to the position of subjectivity. Chain of equivalence is crystallizing subject temporarily in the position of subjectivity but discursive conflict and Antagonism creates new Articulations. Islamic Revolution discourse after the collapse of the Pahlavi was experiencing internal conflict. Temporary block was formed by the equivalence chain was dismantled by the conflict. Islamic discourse was dominant in the discourse community. With Islamists dominating the discourse of the Islamic Republic was formed. In this block, discursive struggle is underway. This is Laclau and Mouffe's idea about the community and society

The Islamic revolution of Iran is the result of the abruption of the hidden forces in Iran’s sociopolitical base that started its stack since the constitution’s era. This revolution would not get its results without Imam Khomeini’s un-substitutive leadership. This writing is about to investigate the bases of leadership and management of Imam Khomeini on the Islamic revolution and its other-making and antagonism with the adversary discourses, liberal (national- religious) and left. According to the hypothesis, the quality of using the social, political and discursive elements in Imam Khomeini’s political thought and practice was so that could in the shade of the marginalizing other discourses and prominenting its discourse gain the most availability and reliability, and also, introduce the Islamist discourse as the hegemon discourse in the Islamic revolution process. As a result, Imam Khomeini’s discourse in the Islamic revolution and in the process of the people’s political mobilization and the realization of the revolution from the elitist groups and the elites of the national and left movement has played an important role because of its political solidarity, accordance with the social conditions, the thought and creed tendencies of the people and their historical background and the existence of the powerful and religious institutions.

Concentration on the importance of “Nation-State” as a notion and the characteristics of a nation that can be seen in Nationalism has long been changed in political thought. it can be argued that nation has changed to a political term and nationalism describes different aspects of the nations.Nationalism or the nationalist sentiment is associated with positive and negative consequences. In this study, lights shed on the explanation of the contradiction or interaction between the ideology of nationalism and Islamism? Despite strong background of Nationalism in Iran, factors such as the Islamic Revolution, religious leadership Imam Khomeini and emphasis on Islam and Islamism after the Islamic Revolution emphasis on Islam and Islamism after the Finally, it is assumed that despite contradictions between the two, a positive, balanced version of nationalism is approved in Islam and Islamic internationalism is in accordance with Islamic teachings.

The power of Islamic Revolution in Iran is not because of its military or economic power, but because of its cultural and spiritual aspect of the revolution. Iran's Islamic Revolution is an example of a true spiritual discourse in politics or the presence of religion in politics that we can see nowadays some of its effects in the Muslim countries uprisings that is called the Islamic Awakening. This idea has not transferred to them by coercion and force, but this is the soft power of Islamic Revolution of Iran that spilled over in these countries and rooted in common Islamic beliefs of all Muslims. The question of this article is:" what are the main characteristics of the Islamic Revolution’s soft power and how it reflects in the Arab region and North Africa". The hypothesis of the article is: "Islamic Revolution's soft power relies on the Islamic ideology and preaching of presence spirituality in politics which recognized by Imam Khomeini. This power on the brink of these movements understood by the people of these countries and caused waves of Islamic awakening. The appearance of Iran’s soft power can be witnessed in the rise of revolutionary slogans and practical actions in these countries. This hypothesis will be evaluated based on the theoretical framework of the Theory of Cultural Export of Revolution.