جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « political discourse » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Political actors are one of the main drivers of public policies. They direct the policies due to their beliefs. Studying their action has a long tradition in policy studies but recent changes known as “ideational turn” gave a new aim to the research. Following this changes this article tries to uncover the images undelaying in the discourses that political actor have presented to public and also identify their ideas, used to gain audience and improve policies. The data are collected from the political discourses of 8 different Presidential Honeymoon Periods from 1989 to 2017. The Framework used to conduct this research is argumentation theory of Isabela and Norman Fairclough’s (political discourse analysis framework). The findings highlight a specific image advocated by the political actors in each Presidential Honeymoon Periods for the cultural problems and also indicates a selective use of constant key ideas in addition to changing ideas based on society’s conditions.

By examining the discourse of social currents in contemporary Iran, one can distinguish between traditional and political discourse in the face of the Ashura event. Traditional discourse emphasizes its individual effects by emphasizing the emotional aspects of the events of Karbala, and political discourse, while using emotional elements, focuses mainly on its political perceptions and social effects, and seeks revolutionary features within it. A historical look at these two approaches shows that the formation of political discourse does not have a long history and its emergence should be sought in the post-constitutional events, which undoubtedly Imam Khomeini has played the greatest role in this direction. Therefore, this article has tried to examine how the political discourse of the Ashura event was formed in the contemporary era with emphasis on the thoughts of Imam Khomeini. In this regard, using historical books and sources, analysis and study of information is collected and with the framework of the theory and method of analysis of Laclau and Mouffe discourse, the hypothesis is emphasized that socio-political developments change the identity of the central signs of political thought of Shiite scholars and As a result, political discourse has been formed since Ashura. The findings of this article show that in political discourse, concepts such as enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, piety and waiting for the vulva are elaborated around the central sign of struggle and uprising in the political discourse of Ashura, while in traditional discourse these concepts revolve around the central sign of worship. They were elaborating.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has tried to influence the Islamic countries of the region by using its own cultural tools and somehow use them in the discourse of active diplomacy. One of the important and influential geographical environments for Iran is the country of Iraq. This country has a special affinity with Iran due to its political, religious and cultural nature. During the historical developments of Iraq, many thinkers such as Sadr and Hakim played a major role in the developments of their country with the influence of Iranian culture and political ideas. The main concern of this article is raised in the form of this question: What is the role of the cultural discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Iraq and what tools does it use on its target society in Iraq? An attempt has been made to answer the above question by analytical-descriptive method and using library resources. The main hypothesis is that “due to the high cultural and religious affinity of Iran and Iraq, Iran has tried to create a kind of favorable dialogue for the realization of its regional policies by using cultural tools and religious commonalities.” For this purpose, the researcher explains and analyzes the common cultural indicators of the two countries.

National unity has been highlighted in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution, as well as the functional and legal structure of the Islamic Republic. However, considering the political and cultural dynamics of the Iranian society, it seems very necessary to explain the theoretical model of national unity in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution. On the other hand, it seems that explaining the components of national unity and related political requirements in general and political sphere of society has been associated with difficulties, mainly due to reductionism in the category of national unity and providing narrow definitions of this concept despite ethnic pluralism. , Has been cultural and religious. Accordingly, the main question of this article is that; What are the theoretical components of national unity in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution, and based on this, what is the approach of the political discourses of the governments to the issue of national unity? To answer the question, library data collection and descriptive-explanatory methods have been used to analyze the data. The main research hypothesis is presented as follows; "The roots of identity national unity in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution are based on the three networks of Iranian identity and patriotic norms, which are institutionalized within the framework of the principles of good Islamic governance and constitutional and civil rights. This theoretical model has three components; "Denial of the pattern of cultural unification is the principle of justice-oriented cultural convergence and the central concept of returning to oneself."

From the beginning of the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the formation of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1357 until now, various discourses have dominated the policies of the country. Each of these discourses was based on the traditional system ruling the society and on the centers of political power, based on the special axis and components of the conditions and situations of the society at that time. One of these important discourses in Iran's political eras is the discourse of reforms, under which new concepts such as rule of law and populism emerged in the political arena, and the popular side of the political system's legitimacy emerged more than in the past. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explain the role of reform discourse on the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic.The main question of this research is what role or impact the discourse of reforms has had on the legitimacy of the political system of the Islamic Republic. The current research is applied in terms of its purpose, descriptive-analytical in terms of its nature, and qualitative research in terms of its nature. In this research, the appropriate data was collected by the library method and then the data analysis was done with the discourse analysis method in the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe

Studying the history of art from the modern era onwards is actually the study of current political and cultural discourses in countries. In the contemporary era, cultural and artistic works cannot be read independently and based on their aesthetic properties. These works are themselves readings of the discourses of power and dominance of their society. Following the political changes in Egypt due to the continuous repressive regimes, the ideologies of the rulers have also evolved. Thus cultural and artistic policies as a tool in the hands of the rulers lead to the creation and production of works that reproduce the governments. Socialism, which was introduced as the most important political discourse in Egypt following the 1952 revolution led by Nasser (President from 1956 to 1970), had a significant impact on Egyptian art. This discourse was an anti-colonialist ideology, and people working in the arts and culture sought to present the uncertainties surrounding them with discussions about the nature, purpose, and future. This article seeks to examine the relationship between the language of painting and the ideology of socialism in order to create new meanings by examining the paintings of the most important artists of this period in contemporary art history, Abdul Hadi al-Jazar, Efat Naji and Ragheb Ayad. The findings suggest that the idea of the modern Egyptian nation, as a cultural discourse, is tied to the emergence of modern Egyptian art. In the works of the Egyptian socialist artists, nation, i.e. Egypt is not merely a political entity but a hypothetical and constructed idea that unites its members around a common geography and history.

This paper aims to explain the pattern of the effect of political discourse on foreign trade interactions between Iran and the European Union in the Ahmadinejad government. The research method is mixed (qualitative and quantitative). In this research, qualitative method (data theorizing theory) was used first for presenting the model. Interview with 10 Iranian experts in the field of political discourse and international relations and foreign policy of Iran was conducted using a targeted sampling method and Results are analyzed and interpreted using three coding steps (open, selective, and axial). At this stage, the statistical population consisted of 150 experts from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Using simple random sampling, 108 of them were selected as samples. A confirmatory factor analysis has been used to examine the effects expressed in the model. The results of this study emphasized the effects of the components of the "anti-politicism of the international system ", "eastern-oriented foreign policy", "people-centered diplomacy" and "emphasis on nuclear rights" on the dimension of aggressive foreign policy and people-centered diplomacy, as well as the effects of the components of "revolutionary stand-up" and "spirituality and justice on the idealistic dimension of Ahmadinejad's government.

This paper tries to figure out how to formulate the political discourse of the eleventh government in a competitive atmosphere with other discourses and with regard to the specific conditions and political climate of the Iranian society. The statistical community of the survey was all television debates of the presidential candidates of the twelfth presidential election, This is between the text of the discussions of Hassan Rouhani and Ishaq Jahangiri as the sample society. The way to identify, redefine and redefine discursive slogans and create distinct and distinct boundaries for understanding the dominant approach to discourse space or hegemony. For this purpose, we used interlacing analysis using the Fractal method and then, using the Laclau and Mouffe method, we extracted the central slab and floating slabs, and reflected the formation of the political discourse of the eleventh government in the form of a chart. The method of frackling by equipping the researcher with tools for Understanding how the ballads are represented and the techniques used by the speaker in order to accept the propositions and influence our audience helps us to get an overview of the discourse provided by the eleventh government. The strategies used by the moderation flow showed that this discourse continued. He is the author of the reform dialogue There are suggestions for strengthening civil society and accompaniment with the people to the extent of attracting their votes. In the following, we tried to include the image in the theoretical framework of the study, the method of analyzing the discourse of Laklaw and Mufa, the main condition for the establishment of the discourse, which is the existence of others and the necessity The presence and existence of antitrust and other boundaries gives a more complete picture of this discourse and its implications.

This Research is trying to focus on Donald Trump's inaugural speech of January 20, 2017, and some of his Twitter messages until June 2018, while meeting and agreeing with the North Korean leader. This study, based on the combined interpretation methodology, relies on content analysis and Discourse analysis at the levels of description, interpretation, and explanation and answers this question: What metaphors have there been in the political linguistics of Donald Trump? Also, how can these metaphors, in terms of form, content, historical tradition, the way they use and language mechanisms, be analyzed and interpreted by the United States foreign and interior policy, as audience communities? In response to the research’s question, the hypothesis of this study is that Trump ›s metaphors take advantage of the content of classical conservatism thought, as the strict father, oriented, contradictory and structural. Regarding the type of metaphors, »combined and anaphoric, with the use of the private sphere language in the public domain.« For the form of metaphors: differentiator and bipolar, and its refelection in interior policy is an aggressive nationalism with the image of economic nationalism. In foreign policy is inconsistent with globalization, hardware, economics, and because of the impact of audience on communities, relying on disturbing and nostalgic metaphors. Therefore, in view of the extent of the domestic and international influences of this metaphorical language, as well as the increase of linguistic tension between Iran and the United States in 2018, it is considered important to study and research.

In the 40-year-old life of Iran, a special form of discourse templates and patterns has emerged that this paper seeks to show the development of political discourse in the Hashemi government. This research aims to explain the pattern of the effect of political discourse on foreign trade interactions. U Iran and the European Union. The research method is mixed (qualitative and quantitative). In the first step, the proposed methodology is based on the method of data theorization, based on the grounded or grounded theory used. The sampling method was conducted purposefully with 10 experts in the field of foreign trade and international relations experts and foreign policy of in-depth interviews. The results of the interviews were analyzed using three stages of coding (open, selective and axial). In order to ensure the accuracy of the results, the obtained results were quantitatively quantitated using a questionnaire. The statistical population of this study includes 180 relevant subject experts in the Trade Development Organization, the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, using simple random sampling, and using Cochran formula, 82 of them were selected as samples. Confirmatory factor analysis has been used to verify and confirm the details of the model. These results show that the effects of "deconcentration" and "interactive approach" on the stress relief in foreign policy, as well as the impact of the categories of "economic development", "national authority and national security", and "expediency" on the economic reconstruction and national interests in the Hashem irrfsanjani government have

This article, which seeks to explore the characteristics and emergence of the right and left dualities in the political world, first explains these universal concepts in human life. The superiority of the right hand to the left hand in cultures, as well as the attribution of this duality to male and female couple by giving examples in ancient Persian literature, is another part of this research. The researcher then looks at the presence and importance of this two words in religion and the holy texts, and explains the similarity of the approach of different religions to these two concepts by attributing the right side to good people and the left side to evils. The presence of this duality in politics during the French Revolution in the constituent assembly of France is the explained. The place of the king immense power supporters on the right and the supporters of the people and the revolutionaries on the left, the importance of the role of newspapers from 1815 in these words in the French political scene. The simple, changeable and comprehensible characters of these concepts for those who ignore the politics are introduced as the reasons for the success of these words in politics.

After Islamic Revolution and the emergence of diffrerent administrations in Iran, variable orientations in foreign policy has been manifestated which affected by different factors. “National Interest” is one of the fundamental concepts as a main base on which formulates foreign policy.The main question is that which components of Iran’s foreign policy discourses considered fixed and which of them considered variative in their interpretation of national interest? Writers believe if meaning “National Interest” as the main national priorities in foreign sphere, there is not any consensus on definition of this concept. Inevitably, this shortage ends in changing foreign priorities in parallel with changing of states and discourses.

The Islamic revolution of Iran is the result of the abruption of the hidden forces in Iran’s sociopolitical base that started its stack since the constitution’s era. This revolution would not get its results without Imam Khomeini’s un-substitutive leadership. This writing is about to investigate the bases of leadership and management of Imam Khomeini on the Islamic revolution and its other-making and antagonism with the adversary discourses, liberal (national- religious) and left. According to the hypothesis, the quality of using the social, political and discursive elements in Imam Khomeini’s political thought and practice was so that could in the shade of the marginalizing other discourses and prominenting its discourse gain the most availability and reliability, and also, introduce the Islamist discourse as the hegemon discourse in the Islamic revolution process. As a result, Imam Khomeini’s discourse in the Islamic revolution and in the process of the people’s political mobilization and the realization of the revolution from the elitist groups and the elites of the national and left movement has played an important role because of its political solidarity, accordance with the social conditions, the thought and creed tendencies of the people and their historical background and the existence of the powerful and religious institutions.

This paper attempts to examine the political thought of Imam Hassan al-Banna and Political Foundations، commonality and distinctiveness of their religious leadership in Iran and Egypt. With regard to this issue، the government and the political establishment in Iran and Egypt، an important issue that deserves the attention of researchers in the field of political science and political thought. Research to investigate the political discourse in the thoughts of Imam Khomeini، Hassan al-Banna، seeks the causes of success and failure of the movement of Imam Hassan al-Banna founded the political system to show. The study seeks to answer the basic question is، what are the political discourse of Imam Hassan al-Banna and، as a result led to the formation of the political system and not the other way? The authors believe that the difference in the principles of political thought and discourse function Dal Hay Andyshh formed in both the religious leader، would bring the discourse of Imam Hassan al-Banna''s discourse is not reaching the practical consequence.

The discourse of Imam Khomeini In response to the consequences of the domination of modern discourse on individual and collective mentality, political Islam around the packing season and it seems this debate to adapt to the society truth can achieve hegemony and their sense of social collective mentality stabilize. The subjects and agents of the world are meaningless in the context of the discourse of Imam Khomeini.The dialogue has its own reading of offers and signified the emergence of such a reference in international relations such as power, peace, war and colonialism.... according to their own sense of meaning stems and read their own offers. In This article attempts, to According to the Imam Khomeini's interpretation of Islam, Checked elements of political discourse of Imam Khomeini and the end Clear The reasons of the hegemonic discourse of Imam Khomeini to other discourses.

By using Laclau and Mouffe discourse analysis theory، broad explanation of political thought’s principles of Qom’s seminary Jame-e Modaressin has been described. Moreover، by explanation in manifests of that organ، nodal point and floated elements of Jame-e Modaressin’s discourse especially political- religious point of views have been determined to clarify relations between those elements and anaphora of them to signified based on Laclau and Mouffe discourse analysis. The result is that، nodal point of that organ has been consist of applying of religious orders based on Velayat-e Faqih، divine legitimacy of leader، relation between religious and policy، and political authority of Islamic clerics.

Omawi period is very considerable with regard to the emerging and forming theological challenges, because most of the theological sects were resulted from the controversial issues of this period. From historical view of political thought, the study of political aspects of these theological challenges are very important, because these arguments related to the issues and problems rooted in challenges between the battled forces of political area and taking position about them had clear political outcomes. The present writing tries to study the theological challenges of Omawi period from this point of view and attempt to highlight the political aspects of these challenges.Accordingly, the political discourse of this period was emerged within the theological discourse. As such, by using the discourse analyses method and critical analyses of the theological challenges, the basic problems and elements of political discourse can be explained. In addition, the exact understanding of different theological conceptions of this period is not possible without considering the political context and aspects of them.