جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "public opinion" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

Discourse creation involves directing public opinion toward a specific concept, which is essential for implementing ideas and concepts effectively. Despite efforts by academic and cultural institutions, there remains an inadequate level of discourse creation for valuable ideas and concepts, primarily due to the lack of an appropriate discourse model. Thus, examining the views of authentic Islamic thinkers is highly significant. This study, using a descriptive-analytical approach and Sterling’s thematic analysis method, seeks to establish a discourse model based on Ayatollah Khamenei’s statements on discourse creation. According to the study's findings, Ayatollah Khamenei’s discourse model views discourse as the process of a concept becoming prevalent in society and public opinion aligning with it. To realize this, key figures—including intellectuals, scholars, poets, writers, officials, artists, students, seminarians, and the national broadcasting network—are designated to foster discourse around socially relevant issues and discourse-ready concepts. They achieve this by meeting specific criteria (thought, repetition, clarification, and modeling) through TV programs, writing, free-thinking forums, promotion, poetry, artistic works, and the resources of various state institutions. Such a discourse is expected to yield outcomes like national progress, problem-solving, facilitating public affairs, increasing the motivation to serve, activating executives, translating ideas into action, generating public approval, fostering individual growth, and enhancing the sense of responsibility.

The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal model of press governance in Islamic society from the point of view of Imam Khomeini (RA). The research findings indicate that in Imam's view, the press should govern the nation and reflect public opinion to govern. The favorable model of press governance extracted in Imam Khomeini's thought has four conditions, which are: 1- Rejection of authoritarian rule with two components of opposition to the authoritarian system and fight against corruption in the press. 2. Orientalism is in the work of the press. 3- In educational governance, in these principles, the Imam of the press is considered as a university and the component of the educational role is considered. But without criticism and the critical role of the press, it is not possible to govern them. The press, in Imam's thought, is closely related to the denial of authoritarian rule. , In this context, understanding the strategy, the consequences of this rule can be enumerated, including freedom of the press, criticism, observance of the law, and the publication of content without conspiracy

Functionality of the media is a tool for managing the public opinion of the society, by which the society can gain the path of happiness - victory or misery - failure. Regarding the impact of media on public opinion, many thinkers have raised issues. The question that can be asked is, from the perspective of the Supreme Leader, what strategies are needed for the media's action to manage the public opinion of the society? The method used in this research will be thematic analysis. The findings of the research such as: news engineering to control public opinion, false portrayal in the media causing the deviation of public opinion, our weakness in producing appropriate content and the like indicate that from the point of view of the leader of the revolution, it is necessary for the media in the Islamic Republic to apply two socio-political and content-operational macro-strategies in produce functional strategies. Given paying attention by public opinions of the Islamic society, this will be managed in the right direction.

In the hybrid battle, as a new type of battles, multiple tools and methods are used in combination with each other in order to create ambiguity and strategic attack. Especially since the focal elements in such a battle are the media and especially social networks. For this reason, it is very important to have powerful media and the ability to manage and guide public opinion in the context of this battleIn addition, the strategic prerequisite in hybrid battles is the ability and effective media and virtual governance. The scope of this capability has a high position in order to solve the problem of managing and directing public opinion and with the aim of media defense and deterrence. Therefore, the main goal of this research is to investigate the needs of public opinion management in the hybrid battle. Therefore, the main question of the research is formulated as follows: "What are the political requirements of public opinion management in the hybrid battle?";In this regard, the document analysis method has been used to advance the research and the phishing tool from various sources has been used to collect data. Based on the findings of the research, exercising governance over the virtual space, having a coherent and up-to-date media strategy and roadmap, rebuilding the authority of the national media, increasing the competitiveness of native social networks and so on. It is among the policy requirements aimed at managing public opinion in the age of combined battles

The relationship between public opinion and foreign policy has always been one of the topics that scholars and experts in political science and international relations have presented different views on. Some theorists have pointed out the instability of public opinion and its excitement, and they even believe that in many cases, public opinion is directed and formed by governments and affiliated media. Therefore, they believe that public opinion cannot be relied on in foreign policy. But on the other hand, another group believes that the researches, studies and surveys that have been conducted, represent some stable and stable components in public opinion and that there are significant trends in public opinion. Therefore, one cannot simply ignore public opinion and ignore public opinion in foreign policy decisions. Therefore, foreign policy decision makers should consider public opinion as an independent variable influencing foreign policy. This research is based on a descriptive-analytical method and using library and documentary studies. The author seeks to examine the relationship between public opinion and foreign policy, and in better words, what role and influence does public opinion have on foreign policy? And to what extent can public opinion influence foreign policy as an independent variable? The findings of this research show that public opinion is considered in the foreign policy decision-making process, both in real form and in the form of guidance and management by governments. And all governments, whether democratic or non-democratic, try to mask the public opinion.

In today's world, the media have a special and unique place in the management of public opinion, so that political systems try to use the media to guide and engineer comprehensive values and attitudes. In fact, the media is one of the most important tools for managing social change and transformations, and due to this important function, have a direct impact on national cohesion and ultimately increase the soft power of countries. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of national media. Analyze and explain in the management of social change. Accordingly, the main hypothesis of the research is that the role of the national media based on prediction and foresight and using Islamic-Iranian teachings will lead to the management of social change. To answer this question, mix methods have been used. The statistical population of this study consists of experts in the fields of media and communication, sociology and social sciences. To test the validity and reliability of the questionnaire items from the perspective of experts, pre-test and also calculation of Cronbach's alpha (0.80) has been used. The data collection tool was a questionnaire and reference to documents. The results of statistical tests of this study show that the role of national media on the management of social change is decisive and has a positive effect and inspired by Islamic-Iranian teachings will promote and increase the soft power of the country

Modern governments have complex societies and mechanisms. These societies cannot be managed with immediate, simple and comprehensive decisions. As one of the pillars of modern society, media and social networks play a significant role in optimal and efficient public policy. The influence and manner of connecting media and public policy is one of the new topics in the field of public policy studies. In this article, the impact of mass media as soft actors on public policy was investigated using the library method. The results of this study show that the media plays a positive and negative dual role in policy making. The positive side of establishing and linking public opinion with the government and persuading the majority of people to increase the probability of success of policies, its negative side, especially with the expansion of social networks, the boom of populism and providing false information to the society, and finally creating social barriers against some policies and creating obstacles for The reforms are fundamental.

The experience of the last few decades has shown that the Islamic Republic of Iran has not performed well in the field of human rights, managing the reflection of internal protests, and justifying its regional policies. Part of this problem is due to external factors and the efforts of the anti-Iranian front; but the role and influence of internal factors cannot be ignored. Lack of common understanding of national interests among policymakers and those responsible for managing the international image of the Islamic Republic, security-oriented foreign policy and cultural exchanges, lack of an independent and responsible national institution in the field of national image, lack of institutionalized and defined communication/ division of work between active institutions in the field of public diplomacy and Iran's international image and not having a long-term plan in the field of public diplomacy and managing Iran's international image have been one of the most important internal obstacles and challenges in creating a favorable image of Iran in the world. Institutionalizing, national branding, actualizing the capacity of Iranians abroad, appropriate and targeted management of cultural agencies, accurate geographical/cultural/political target audience, optimal use of virtual space and management of daily messages are some of the solutions presented in this article to improve Iran's international image management.

The present age has been named the information age due to use new information technologies. communication technologies have entered all social space , and individual in human societies and his daily life, and knowledge have influenced him cyberspace as a collection of human interaction through computers regardless of space and place. leaders have specific communication patterns to achieve their goal and align public opinion with their ideas, . The present study is descriptiveexploratory in terms of method and is an applied study in terms of purpose and is an analytical study in terms of data analysis. The statistical population in this study is 45 candidates in Ilam . . After collecting information , the results were analyzed . Finally, after testing the hypotheses, the results showed that there is a significant relationship between interactive power, persuasive power, empathy and like-mindedness of social networks and their use to influence public opinion.

Reporting corruption can be seen as disclosing information about mismanagement or abuse of power to commit an illegal act or act. It seems that our rules on reporting are only focused on testimony and information, and in this context, we have supported the person who reports corruption. Public participation in reporting corruption is one of the effective factors in preventing corruption by determining the reward system, compensating the reporter in case of damage by violators, maintaining identity and confidentiality, banning dismissal and job support , Reporting the transparent performance of violations to the public, the use of advanced electronic devices to receive complaints and public reports of violations can be implemented and practical. Fighting corruption according to the strategic policies of the leadership can also strengthen the field of greater public participation in political affairs and democracy.The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical qualitative and the research data are collected in a library method by taking notes.

The media as a tool for Crisis building and de-crisis, enlightenment, creating a space for a healthy and constructive approach to views and appropriate information, is one of the most important factors of progress and a sign of dynamism and mobility of society in today's world. In today 's world, the media forms a large part of the nature of public opinion, and this trend is increasing. Our main question in this research is the cultural, social and political role of the media of the Resistance Front in managing the public opinion of the Syrian crisis. The method used in this research is descriptive and analytical. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through formal method and content validity and the validity of the items was checked and confirmed through Cronbach's alpha (0.990). The statistical population of this study includes managers and experts related to the field of resistance media and the study sample that was purposefully selected included 43 managers and experts related to the field of media in Syria who also had sufficient information about this research and They have also been willing to cooperate. The research findings indicate that the cultural impact of the media, including mentality, culture, social impact, including hope, unity and political impact, including crisis resolution and enlightenment, have an effective role in managing public opinion.

In today's world, we face a phenomenon called media; A media that has a very high power and deep influence in the public opinion of all societies and countries. The media as a tool for enlightenment, creating a space for a healthy and constructive approach to views and appropriate information, is one of the most important factors of progress and one of the signs of dynamism and mobility of society in today's world. The main concern of the present study is The political-security role of the media of the Resistance Front in managing the public opinion of the Syrian crisis. The present study is a descriptive survey; Data collection tool in this study was a researcher-made questionnaire, its validity was confirmed by face method and content validity and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.993). The statistical population of this study includes officials and experts related to the media of the resistance movement and the study sample that was purposefully selected included 30 officials and experts related to the field of media in Syria who had sufficient information about this study and The findings of the study indicate that the political-security roles of the media, such as crisis resolution, awareness and enlightenment, political development of society, etc. have an effective role in managing public opinion.

In today's world, the importance of traditional and electronic media in increasing soft power is not hidden from anyone. The present study seeks to examine the role of print media and news sites in promoting the soft power of a country. In this regard, the main question is what effect do print media and news sites have on a country's soft power? In response to this question, the central hypothesis has been raised that print media and news sites increase soft power by influencing the mental and psychological structure of the audience, directing public opinion and mobilizing resources. The above hypothesis is tested in this research using descriptive-analytical method and library tools. On the other hand, in order to theoretically support the issue, the theories of Habermas, Klaus Ofe and Gramsci media hegemony have been used. Findings indicate that soft power in the system of effort with regard to print media and news sites as one of the important strategies and policies to achieve the goals of political systems can be. Finally, the soft power of Iran and the role of the media in this regard will be considered.

In this article, an attempt is made to pay attention to and explain the effect of the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran in strengthening the power and influence of the Shiites in the political structure of Iraq. After the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam's regime, the Islamic Republic, as an important and influential country in the region, has tried to use its soft power sources to increase its sphere of influence and expand its geopolitical territory in the new Iraq. Meanwhile, by increasing the weight and consolidating the power of the Shiites in the political structure and equations of Iraq, the Islamic Republic, while developing convergence with the new government, has achieved high power and influence in Iraq, especially among the Shiites. Therefore, the main question of the research is what effect has the Islamic Republic of Iran had on strengthening the power of the Shiites in the political equations of Iraq (2020-2003)?The premise of this article is that since the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, the Iraqi political scene has been marked by increasing Shiite power and influence; Therefore, based on the discourse of the Islamic Revolution, the Islamic Republic is trying to strengthen the role and position of the Shiites in the political equations of Iraq, to prevent the factors of power from leaving the hands of the Shiites of this country, and in this regard; To develop Tehran's sphere of influence and acting power in the field of Iraqi politics.

As a part of political life and illuminating broker, public opinion is a necessary evil in foreign policy. While the traditional approach considers confidentiality as the main element of foreign policy, regarding mass media as a detached intellect of public opinion and idealistic interpretation about foreign policy, repudiate the independent political life of public opinion, the new approach emphasizes the influence of public opinion on foreign policy by criticizing the traditional approach and accents on the reduction of the informative monopoly of policymakers due to globalization and the cognitive revolution. The importance of public opinion in the modern approach is such that the inconsistency between public opinion and foreign policymakers will decrease rational decision making. In other words, the availability of foreign policy has turned the new millennium into a citizenship’s century. Accordingly, analyzing the relationship between public opinion and foreign policy is the main question of this paper. Despite the interpretations of the researchers of international relations that consider public opinion as unattractive and inactive forces, the main hypothesis of this paper regards public opinion rational actor who affects the foreign policy according to the environment and the subject of the decision. This paper will test the hypothesis by using the pluralistic sociology approach and cognitive priority.

Media as a tool to securitize the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the US Congressional Documents.After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in 1978, the United States did its utmost to undermine the Islamic-revolutionary identity of the Islamic Republic. The most important US action is to securitize Iran on the world scene. In this process, the United States, as a security actor, has used the media as a functional and facilitating actor to persuade public opinion, consensus among official actors, and take action against Iran. The question is, how has the United States used media tools to secure Iran? The hypothesis is that the United States has facilitated the process of securitizing Iran by enacting policies for the media and their financial support. In the first decade of the revolution, persuading American and world public opinion was on the agenda. In the second decade, this tool was used to persuade public opinion to reach a consensus against Iran. In the third decade, a consensus was formed to act and change the beliefs and attitudes of the Iranian people with the aim of bringing them together to change the system and impose international sanctions on Iran. In the fourth decade, media tools were used to consolidate and strengthen the security process in persuasion, consensus and action. After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in 1978, the United States did its utmost to undermine the Islamic-revolutionary identity of the Islamic Republic. The most important US action is to securitize Iran on the world scene. In this process, the United States, as a security actor, has used the media as a functional and facilitating actor to persuade public opinion, consensus among official actors, and take action against Iran. The question is, how has the United States used media tools to secure Iran? The hypothesis is that the United States has facilitated the process of securitizing Iran by enacting policies for the media and their financial support. In the first decade of the revolution, persuading American and world public opinion was on the agenda. In the second decade, this tool was used to persuade public opinion to reach a consensus against Iran. In the third decade, a consensus was formed to act and change the beliefs and attitudes of the Iranian people with the aim of bringing them together to change the system and impose international sanctions on Iran. In the fourth decade, media tools were used to consolidate and strengthen the security process in persuasion, consensus and action.

After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, anti-Shiism and Iranophobia are two important factors in most of the media in the Arab world, whether in written form such as Al-Hayat, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, Akhbar Al-Khaleej, Al-Ittihad, Al-Riyadh or visually as a network. Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya, Al Arab. The purpose of this research, which has been written in a descriptive-analytical method based on "representation theory", is to study the role of the Saudi Al-Arabiya network in influencing the public opinion of the Arab world by representing some anti-Iranian and Shiite events. According to the theory of representation in the process of influencing public opinion, a media is never a neutral tool and a neutral mediator in presenting the image; Because the media relies on language and meaning, and language and meaning always rely on power in the context of discourse. According to the "biased representation" theory, the Al-Arabiya network, based on the Wahhabi ideology, traces and pursues a policy of Iranophobia and anti-Shiism in a way that even Iran is more dangerous to the Arab world than the Zionist regime. The results of the present study show that in the process of Saudi psycho-media operations against Islamic Iran and also deciphering the revelation of Arab-Israeli relations in the media dictionary of Al-Arabiya network, the Islamic Republic should be portrayed as an anti-Sunni military. It has nothing to do but suppress the Sunnis of the region and dominate the Islamic and Arab world in the form of the Shiite Crescent.

The issue of normalization of relations with the Zionists has political, economic and sociological dimensions within the Arab communities. Although this trend has increased with regional and international pressures, what stands out most is the situation of Arab communities in response to this normalization. Perhaps this sociological situation, more than any other component, has predisposed the Arab states to develop their relations with the Zionists. Of course, this situation, influenced by the structure of civil society, the government's relationship with civil society and the masses, has highlighted the passive-subordinate political culture towards the rulers in these societies. This article seeks to answer the question: what are the reasons for the lack of proper reaction of public opinion in Arab societies to the normalization of relations between some Arab states and the Zionist regime, using a descriptive-analytical method and using library and foreign sources?

Political trust is the most important elements in democracy which has an important role in political and social stability of society. Yazd has experienced high political participation level in throughout history. According to this; this study intends to investigate the social factors affecting political trust from the perspective of public opinion in Yazd by survey method.

The research method was survey (quantitative); the data collection tool was a questionnaire. Using Cochran's general formula, a sample size of 384 was determined.

The research findings show that there is a significant relationship between religious affiliation, socio-political cohesion, national identity, relative deprivation, mass media consumption, social justice and legalism with political trust. In terms of multiple regressions; religious affiliation with beta value (0.219), socio-political cohesion (0.303), national identity (0.462), relative deprivation (0.386), media consumption (0.397), social justice (372) / 0) and legalism (0.245) had the greatest effect on political trust.

Based on the results of the study, independent variables in model could express and prospect 45 percent of political trust changes. This variable is equal to 35% at the high level, 39% at the average level and 26% at the low level. Accordingly, the political trust of the citizens of Yazd is appropriate.