جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "the constitution of the islamic republic of iran" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

In this research, it has been investigated how the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran can act as a main source for determining the principles governing the foreign policy and relations of this country with its neighbors. According to the data analysis, the strategic model in the administration of relations with the neighbors based on the constitution has been investigated to advance Iran's good neighborly policy. The research through the data of the foundation and the interpretation of the principles of the constitution related to the three categories of guidelines, goals and policies counted from thirty-seven propositions and finally reached 09 guidelines, 16 goals and 5 policies. The important principles that have been emphasized in Iran's foreign policy and relations include the rule of God's law, the regulation of foreign policy based on Islamic standards, support for Islamic movements, all Muslims are one nation, negation of any domination and domination, foreign domination is prohibited. Independence and freedom and the rule of justice and justice are the right of all people of the world, issuing a revolution, defending the rights of all Muslims in the world, political asylum and decision-making in foreign relations with the Supreme National Security Council and confirming the leadership and executive body of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. According to these principles and data analysis, suggestions have been presented to improve Iran's foreign relations, which can help to realize the country's good neighborly relations policy and provide a suitable strategic model for managing relations with neighbors.

The ‘authority of law’ is one of the most important principles which all the constitutions of the world consider acceptable. According to this principle, authority is represented in the laws of a country, which consider all citicizens equal before law. Identifying the duties and jurisdiction of officials and considering them equal with other citizens as well as predicting various types of supervising the work of the statesmen, the constitution of the Islamic Repulic of Iran officially recognizes the principle of the authority of law.In Islamic law, a Muslim ruler has the right to directly make decisions in accordance with the interests of Islam and Muslims. These decisions are known as “governmental judgements”, which as stated in the principles 5, 110 and 112 of the constitution of the Islamic Republice of Iran, have to be obeyed, as in the case of primary and secondary judgements.Among the questions which are raised in the field of public law is: Are governmental judgements in contradiction with the principle of authority of law? The author sees that governmental judgements are symbolic of the principle of the anthority of law. Fiqhi and legal evidence indicates that law, which includes the codified law and governmental judgements as well as the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran endorse this view. This research uses a descriptiveanalytical method and cites evidence from fiqhi and legal resources to support its argument.

Considering the ruling systems of countries, any country has special theoretical bases on which the theoretical bases for laws of that country are specified, compiled, and approved by the scholars, elite, and leaders of the country. The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran also has functions which, in some cases, are unique and, in many cases, are similar to the legal functions of other countries. But, this constitution from the standpoint of theoretical bases is unique and new stemming from principles of Islamic ideologies and reflected in the opinions of the countries elite, including Imam Khomeini (r) and Shahid Ayatollah Beheshti (r). In this paper, some functions and then the theoretical bases for the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the opinions of these two scholars are researched.

In the last century, modern nation – building caused two main cultural challenges in the third words and developing countries: religiousness v. secularism and cultural and ethnic identification v. cultural and linguistic assimilation. Like the other non – western countries were experienced exotic modernization follow from the westernization and agency modernization based on state – oriented, Iranian society was faced with two problems mentioned above. So it is necessary to new policy for them and strategic managing this ethnic and cultural diversity so that in this policy would be appearing national solidarity and integration stimuli, structurally and durably. In this respect, it would be pay attention on replacing citizenship right and definition of national identity based upon unitary exactly plurality with denying the cultural and ethnic diversity.