جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "آیات حجاب" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

The comparative discourse analysis between the holy Quran and the Quranic studies can be employed as a comprehensive and methodological assessment. In this method with emphasizing the identical meter and trend of the Quran and the connected work can be judged that the general system (arrangement and order) of the work is in harmony with the general system of the holy Quran. In this paper the discourse of two verses 30 and 31 of surah al-Noor (Arabic: سوره النور) and some discourses of the contemporary exegeses with comparative form and with analytic-descriptive method has been investigated. Under two main categories “focus-word and the context of the selection of words” it has been studied the process of the structure of terms and then in the section of sentences and siaq (the linguistic sense; context) it has been surveyed the important existing discourse consideration in the text in comparative form. Lastly in the siaq of the men who are muʾmin (Arabic: مومن believer), the phenomenon of command without command and anaphoric role and indicative change has been seen and in the siaq of women who are believers it has been found the considerable cognitive scope (range) and at the last in the common part the cohesive role and the referential center has been observed.

The Verses 31 of Noor, 53 and 59 of Ahzab are known as the verses of hijab. The present study seeks to investigate the method of interpretation of the above verses in the commentaries Al-Kashaf and Al-Mizan. Based on the order of revelation and appearance of the verses, God Almighty first instructs the believing men in verse 53 of Ahzab that their encounter with the wives of the Prophet (s) should be "min wara`i hijabin". Then, in verse 59, he asks the believing women to cover themselves with "jalbab" so that they will not be harassed by those illegal to them. Finally, in verse 31 of Noor, by mentioning the details of the issue of hijab, draws its limits. In the meantime, Zamakhshari has sometimes provided an unacceptable interpretation of the verse in question, citing weak narrations. When comparing his views with those of Allameh Tabatabai and evaluating his reasons and documents, some of Zamakhshari's views such as viewing the second caliph`s discontent and zeal of foreign`s coming and going in the house of the Holy Prophet (s) as the revelation ground of the verse of Ahzab are surely unacceptable. Also, both commentators have sometimes given up the appearance of the verse without any reason and have given an interpretation contrary to the appearance.

“Limits of hijab” is among the important issues that has been widely discussed in recent years, and the extent of hijab in the Islamic texts is one of the topics related to it. Mr. Mohsen Kadivar is one of the modernists who has addressed this issue in a series of lessons and sessions on hijab and has published his views in a piece of writing entitled “Reflection on the Issue of Hijab”. He believes that although the texts of narrations point out the limits of covering, it is not possible to obtain the limits of women’s covering from the appearance of the Quranic verses on hijab, and these verses only emphasize the preservation of chastity and women’s covering. In this article, his point of view has been studied and evaluated using the analytical-critical method. Finally, it has been concluded that the verses of the Quran imply the maximum covering of women, and the claim that they emphasize the limits of womenchr('39')s hijab is incorrect.

The holy Quran`s attending to the subject of hijab, like most social subjects, is in a gradual way and based on a sociological basis. God, the Almighty, having explained natural and fundamental problems of hijab and preparing appropriate cultural ground and making a reference to a lawful relation between man and woman as guarding one`s modesty and eye, attends to the how and limit of hijab. One of the most important verses in the field is 31 of Noor light, which describes women`s lawful dressing in detail. Despite numerous interpretations, due to the absoluteness of some of its words, lack of exact examples and contrary traditions the verse has been disputed, especially in the recent centuries due to the prevalence of Western culture and a different view on women. Some view common interpretations of the verse critically and give contrary ideas in the field. Regarding various comments, demurs and the traditions of the subject, the paper has studied the verse.