جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "وجوه و نظائر" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

This research has been done with the purpose of explaining the types of methods of understanding adjectives in the psychological verses of the Qur'an and with a descriptive-analytical method. The research findings show that in order to know the meaning and understand the psychological keywords of the collected verses, three methods can be used. The first method is "conceptology" or the discovery of the components of the psychological word, which is done by dividing its different dimensions. It has three functions. Also, the third method is to examine the "synonyms" of psychological words, the first step of which is to discover synonyms, and then, in the second step, to discover the characteristics of synonyms, which is done through the use of dictionaries, contexts, and other verses. As a result, in order to understand psychological terms, firstly, the components of the word such as roots, types, and works are discovered, and then the real, figurative, or ironic aspects of that word are examined, and finally, by discovering its synonyms and also examining the distinguishing features of the selected word. It is possible to provide new psychological understandings of the verse.

The concepts of wuaūh and naẓā’īr refer to instances where a word is used with the same spelling and pronunciation in multiple places within the Quran but carries different meanings in each context. The identical form of the word in different contexts is termed naẓā’īr, while the varying meanings represent wuaūh. Consequently, naẓā’īr refers to the words themselves, and wuaūh denotes their meanings. This descriptive study examines contemporary Turkish translations of the Quran, focusing on the nuances and synonyms of the words ṣalāt and dῑn. Our aim is to analyze how six Turkish translators have rendered these terms over time and to evaluate the accuracy and precision of their translations, as well as the evolution of Turkish translation practices in the modern era. Our findings indicate that most Turkish translators have exhibited a tendency to imitate one another throughout history, with limited evidence of innovation or independent interpretation.

Faces means the use of one word in multiple meanings which have different meanings in different situations. This topic in semantics is called polysemy. In this research, which is organized in a descriptive and comparative method, after the study of different faces and parallels of the word 'Din' from the viewpoints of semantics and traditional methods, the way of translating the different faces of this word in the Turkish-Istanbul translations will be investigated. This article has no equivalent in Islamic literature and this is the first one. Most of the translators have devoted their efforts to the fluency and soundness of the translation and have neglected the accuracy in finding equivalents of Quranic words and observing grammatical points. Of course, in the cases where the word 'Din' was included in the vocabulary, the performance of the Turkish translators has been appropriate to a large extent.

The field of vocabulary and lexicology is a broad and extensive discipline that discusses the meanings of individual words, their nuances, relationships, and how they are used in the Quran. Knowing the meanings of the words of the Holy Quran is one of the necessary tools for understanding the meaning of the verses of divine revelation. Arabic has various styles, and by recognizing these styles, one can access the subtleties and points of the Quran. This article, through analytical-descriptive examination and the method of collecting documentary and library research data, has studied the structure of two books: the "Mufradat" by Raghib Isfahani and the "Tafsir al-Kashaf" by Zamakhshari, which are of special importance in terms of lexical, vocabulary, and structural order. The results of this research indicate that both authors have used verses and traditions, the conditions of the era of revelation, Arabic poetry and proverbs, and the semantic aspects of the verses to discover the meaning of the word in the textual context of the Quranic verses. In some cases, such as the original meaning, usages, derivations, Raghib is more prominent, and in others, such as attention to the semantic aspects of the causes of revelation, discovering meaning from poetry, and attention to morphology and syntax, Zamakhshari is superior.

The knowledge of polysemy and synonymy has long served to contribute to the field of interpretation. There has been a widespread difference of opinions among scholars, however, regarding the purpose and benefit of such knowledge. In the sources ever written on polysemy and synonymy, the selection of words and their semantic relationships are not well accounted for. Indeed, the corresponding discussions in those sources are complicated in terms of tenets and instances. Through a comparative study based on the etymological features of words and the pivotal role of denotations in understanding the Qur’anic verses, an attempt is made here to address the concerns of those who advocate the centrality of core meanings in the understanding of the Qur’an. The denotative core of a number of etymologically related words is like an axis to which those words converge. That is to say, lexical items of the same core can be packaged in one semantic category despite their nuances of meaning. In the present study, this issue is illustrated with the words haqh and qhest. The former is of various usages all with the core sense of vojoud (existence), but the latter is used in opposite terms all with tasallob (strictness) as their core meaning.

The knowledge of semantics and theoretical vocabulary in the Qur'an is one of the important techniques that considered as sub-branches of interpretation. This knowledge explains the meaning of Qur'anic terms like peer. Throughout the history of the Qur'anic sciences, various works, have been written on this subject. The authors of these works have used different rules for interpreting the Qur'anic vocabulary, but, except in very few cases, none have discussed the rules of this knowledge separately. In this article, some of the most important rules of this knowledge are study by descriptive-analytical method and by inductive method. Finally, its related rules are extract in two textual sections (rule of contradiction, rhetorical rules, context, rhetoric for the spirit of meaning, and rule of knowing objects with antithesis) and extramarital rules (such as vocabulary and descent).

The issue of aspects and homologues in the Qur’an has since long ago received the attention of thinkers of Qur’an sciences; and every scholar has taken long steps according to his intellectual foundations and capabilities in its conceptual and evidential elucidation. One of the books written about the science of aspects and homologues after that of Muqātil b. Sulaymān Balkhī is Tarmadhī’s Taḥṣīl Naẓā’ir al-Qur’ān. Contrary to Muqātil b. Sulaymān’s method that deals with unveiling the meaning of the Qur’anic words more with relying on the context of the verses, Tarmadhī, by taking the “principle of excluded synonymy” and using the “principle of shared meaning” tried in his book to turn the apparently antonym meanings back to an integrated meaning and to show that contrary to Muqātil’s idea, the synonymy of the root of derived words suggests the equivalence of their meaning. With a reappraisal and exploration of the method of Ḥakīm Tarmadhī in Taḥṣīl Naẓā’ir al-Qur’ān through an inductive procedure, it is attempted in this research to present an accurate analysis of the exegetical method of the Qur’anic words in this book.

Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir (Polysemy) is one of the branches of the Quranic sciences which is originated from the exegesis (tafsir) of the noble Quran and it is revealed in the shape of the subjectivity writings in this course. The authors in this note which is to some extent named Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir (Polysemy) have collected words with multiple meanings (polysemy) and their meanings and synonyms (words with different spelling and pronunciation but having the same meaning). But none of them made clear (obvious) their meaning of Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir or at least it has not been recorded for and conveyed posterity. This created disunity among posterity about their intended meaning of Al-Wujuh wa al-Naza’ir and because of the definition of the second group which Suyuti is the most famous of all has been misunderstood it causes to multiply (increase) the different opinions and divergence about it. Now today’s readers confront variety of definitions and different and inharmonious notions that they do not know which are correct. This research with descriptive- analytic method tries to shed light on it and according to the authors’ opinion; the correct definition belongs to Suyuti and his followers; of course with the notion which this writing has achieved.