جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « آیات متشابه » در نشریات گروه « فلسفه و کلام »

Dividing the verses of the Qur'an into strong and similar has been the preparation of the holy law in the seventh blessed verse of Surah Al-Imran. But this separation in the beginning set the stage for different opinions and opinions about the interpretation and interpretation of similar verses. Courts are not subject to such sensitivity due to the direct, emphatic and explicit reference. But considering the hidden religious, religious, epistemological and scientific characteristics in similar verses, research on these verses is always necessary and important. Understanding the importance of this issue, the present research, using a qualitative method and based on descriptive-analytical approach, has discussed some considerations about the interpretation of similar verses in Shiite exegetical texts. The results of the discussion show that, first of all, most commentators of the Qur'an try to base the interpretation of the parallels on the basis of what is clearly and strictly defined in the verses. Also, some of these interpretations, according to the mystical, philosophical or religious epistemology they are inclined towards, try to reveal the metaphorical and figurative forms that are hidden in the heart of these verses with such tendencies. Reflecting on the type of similarity that exists in these verses is a common feature of all exegetical texts, that is, they pay special attention to the reason for the similarity based on whether it is appropriate, complete, or difficult.

One of the theories suggested in Islamic tradition on how to face with similar words in Quran is the theory of putting words forth for the spirit of meaning. It has been stated explicitly by Ghazzali for the first time. This theory has been accepted among mystics and followers and of transcendent theosophy in the history of Islamic thought. Transcendent theosophy has been accepted and used in detail based on a continuum of some foundations by professor Javadi Amoli. As is understood, for him, the theory has been based on: maximum obligation to Arabic grammar in religious texts, insufficiency of Jaheli Arab literature to satisfy the Divine wisdom, rejecting eisegesis and hermeneutic views, believing in the multiple layers in the existence, and the originality of truth in Quran. He considers the theory as the basement for a new window to understand the Quran and its addresses. He referred to this theory for knowing the meaning of some words in the Book and tradition such as day, come, pen, tablet, food, choosing, speech, word, business, the lamp, taste, way, keys and book

Ambiguous Quranic verses have been one of the challenging issues during the history of Islamic sciences. In the principles of his ontology، Mulla Sadra Shirazi (the Leader of Theosophers) believes in particular monotheism versus general monotheism. He holds that، on the basis of philosophical-mystical principles of particular monotheism view، outward meanings of Quranic verses can be maintained and all ambiguous verses can predicated to their outwards meanings، without the necessity of expounding the esoteric meanings of verses or of belief in corporealization about the essence of God. On the contrary، ambiguous verses cannot be predicated on their outward meanings on the basis of general monotheism; rather، their esoteric meanings should be expounded and the belief in corporealization about the Necessary Being should accepted. Given the fact that ambiguous Quranic verses are multi-factorial، Mulla Sadra adopts an inter-disciplinary approach to this issue

There are four main views concerning metaphorical terms in the Qur’an: the view of Zahirites, the theory of univocality, the theory of the truth and metaphor, and the theory of the spirit of meaning. Based on the theory of the spirit of meaning, words are chosen based on the spirits of meanings, and characteristics and applications are not taken into account in their meanings. Therefore, their employment can also be true about intelligible cases. Thus the metaphorical words used in the Qur’an in relation to abstract and intelligible referents have been employed in their real meanings and not in a metaphorical sense.This view was first proposed by Ghazzali and has been discussed in the works of the great figures of Islamic philosophy since then. It has been dealt with particularly by some prominent scholars such as Fayd Kashani, Sabziwari, ‘Allamah Tabataba’i, and Imam Khomeini. Since Mulla Sadra has played an undeniable role in the development and dissemination of this theory. This paper specifically examines his interpretation of this theory.