جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "حکیمی" در نشریات گروه "ادیان و عرفان"

Wisdom, and consequently, philosophy as the symbol of rationality, is one of most important components of the formation of religious epistemology in the bilateral relationship of wisdom and narration. In this regard, enumerating revelation, wisdom, and heart intuition and discovery as means to religious knowledge, and using these three, Allameh Tabataba'i has tried to create a unitary approach in the area of religious knowledge. But, introducing separation and inventing terms like self-founded religious wisdom and treasured wisdom, Mr. Hakimi tries to imply independence of religious texts from philosophical understanding. It is attempted to study this issue through a library method and a comparison of the works of these two. Findings indicate a lack of correspondence between the two viewpoints and the approaches taken. Hakimi is found to fight and avoid philosophy as much as Tabataba’i is found to be a philosopher and practitioner of philosophy in the area of religious teachings, such that Hakimi emphasizes self-efficacy and argumentation of the appearances of religious texts and rejects any philosophical inquiry in religious texts.

The question of what kind of intellect is in Tafkikian is one of the most important issues. Comparing the views of the two influential characters in the Tafkik school is that Isfahani regards mind as an abstract individual, in contradiction to science and philosophy, and with other sensible ones. It is a fact that discontinuity and certainty are valid if they produce the acquired knowledge. Also, the belief in the intellect and the knowledge of both knowledge is similar to the Asharite's view. Hakimi, however, believes that there is no equality between the philosophical and theological sciences with the divine teachings, and in the event of a conflict between reason and appearance, he does not interpret the meaning and does not convey the power of reason. The essence of the perception of the eternal will be on the rational and original wisdom of the religious foundation. Their opinions differ in the method of using intellect and intellect.