جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « گونه شناسی » در نشریات گروه « ادیان و عرفان »

A central theme in the typology of traditional Islam is its treatment of constant and variable elements within the religion. Given that Sharia laws possess intrinsic advantages and disadvantages in various actions, and considering the significant influence of temporal and spatial contexts on these elements, a secondary question arises: What is the scope and boundary of constant and variable rulings in traditional Islam? Can distinct domains be identified for constant and variable elements, and are specific boundaries discernible between them? How much variation can constants accommodate? This research aims to assess the Prophetic hadith, “Muḥammad’s halal is halal forever until the Day of Resurrection,” and its implications by examining the approaches of three traditional groups using a descriptive-analytic method. The study reveals that the traditional conservative group tends to uphold a rigid view of constant elements and a more flexible view of variable elements. In contrast, the traditional teleological group, with its broader perspective on variable elements, supports a more flexible approach to constants and an expansion of variables. These differing perspectives offer new insights into how Islam can proactively address contemporary challenges and modernity.

Mahdaviyyat doctrine is a major element of Islamic thinking that can play its role by illustrating an achievable future in forming the essence of Islamic civilization. This doctrine can be a guiding star to lead the Islamic societies toward well developed ones that enjoy ideal civilization. This doctrine has had an effective role in the Islamic Revolution of Iran’s victory, establishment and survival. The following years of the revolution, different approaches toward Mahdaviyyat has been taken by different scholars and authorities of Mahdaviyyat. All these approaches can help the Islamic civilization to be fulfilled.The present writing, after analyzing the written and multimedia sources and interviewing the authorities of Mahdaviyyat, using the qualitative method of IPA and with the help of typology technique, is looking for the key question that, how can the approaches formed after revolution towards Mahdaviyyat be analyzed typologically regarding the civilizational capacities? Or in other words, what capabilities does each of these approaches have to fulfill the civilizational approach of the Islamic Revolution?

Despite still untold angles and dimensions of the phenomenon of false claims of Messianism that have remained undiscovered, there is considerable scientific data available now on the subject unlike the past.It is noteworthy that the false messianic claimants themselves are not the same in the substance despite being much more in line with a similar range of issues in the history of Islam. This paper also attempts to offer a variety of false claims, in light of messianic thinking reveal originality. This paper describes a method of analysis, which is based on data collected from various sources is necessary. The results of the analysis and synthesis of data shows the false messianic claimants, depending on several considerations, are divided according to the following types: type the claim, the nature of the claims, the historical era of the claims, religion of the claimant, personality of the claimant, the outcome of the claim and the geographic or demographic extent of the person who claimed. Undoubtedly, the said cases does not include all possible types and forms of false claims, but the study and further reflection on this subject having the various considerations, we can achieve more diversity in the claims or reach assumptions that can be further studied.