جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « قرارداد » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

Non-fulfillment of obligations is one of the important issues of contract law, which guarantees performance and claims for damages are very important and at the same time a point of disagreement.The purpose of this study is to examine the conditions for claiming damages from contracts in jurisprudence and law.

The research method of this article is descriptive and analytical. Materials and data are also qualitative and data collection was used in collecting materials and data.
Ethical Considerations: In this article, the originality of the text, honesty and trustworthiness are respected.

In jurisprudence and accordingly in Iranian law, the fulfillment of the obligation is the first solution to deal with the breach of contract, and non-fulfillment of obligations is the most important condition for claiming damages due to the contract.

The deadline for fulfilling obligations, violation of contractual obligations, entry of damages and specification of compensation for damages in the contract or law or custom are the most important conditions for claiming damages due to the contract in Iranian law. Regarding the first condition, it should be said that the deadline for the execution of the contract means that until the obligation is fulfilled, it is not possible for the obligee to demand it. Regarding the second condition, it should also be said that the obligee must have refused to perform the contractual obligations, and in other words, he has committed a fault.

There is no doubt that the right to access information is one of the most basic rights of every buyer. This doubles the necessity of the current research in relation to the examination of contracts in this field. The leading article was written with the aim of analyzing the effect of the principle of justice and good faith on the provision of information and warnings in contract law. Therefore, the obligation to provide necessary information is one of the traditional rights of every consumer based on the principle of justice and good faith, which is certainly considered one of the duties of the strong party of the contract. This research has been compiled by content analysis method and in a library form and by referring to the regulations. The results of the research indicate that there is no definition of good faith and contractual justice in the laws of Iran. Also, the lack of strict regulations on the advertising of goods can create many problems in the direction of protection from the weak side of the contract. After conducting the research, it is concluded that in commercial dealings and providing information and warnings about contractual substitutes, it is appropriate to accept the theory of pure responsibility in Iranian law and take a big step in promoting the rights of consumers and all-round compliance. Justice in contracts should be removed.

The imperative for the protection of intellectual property rights concerning computer programs arises from their pivotal role in modern society and the considerable resources invested in their development. However, there are ongoing movements advocating for the release of certain software outside the traditional economic paradigm of intellectual property, promoting the concept of open-source software. Advocates of these movements emphasize the importance of user freedom in both the development and application of software. As a result, users must accept specific contractual terms when utilizing the software, which regulate modifications and redistribution. While some international courts classify such software within the intellectual property framework and subject it to applicable legal rules, a majority of legal scholars contend that these protections are more appropriately situated within the realm of contract law. This article investigates the validity of such contracts within the context of Iranian law, assessing their classification among conventional contract types. The research ultimately concludes by affirming the legitimacy of these contracts based on their intrinsic stipulations.

Dowry is considered one of the social traditions rooted in religious principles in Iranian society. The diverse functions of dowry have led this tradition to persist over the years. In recent decades, the prevalence of exorbitant and unreasonable dowries and its social harmful consequences have prompted a reexamination of the legal and jurisprudential nature of such dowries. One of the undesirable consequences is the inheritance of the right to claim them, leading to the prolonged existence of the cases related to it for many years. In this article, the mentioned problem has been examined with a descriptive- analytic method.  It appears that solutions based on invalidating unreasonable dowries or relying on evidence indicating the non-inheritance of such rights are not adequate. Hence, as an alternative way, proposing agreements contract like dowry including its positive function but devoid of undesirable consequences is suggested. Such contracts will not addressed to this subject and solve the interpretation of the parties’ intentions, clarify the conditions of mutual consent, and other complex issues around the topic of unreasonable dowries.

Concluding a contract usually has an effect on the future. It cannot be expected to have complete effects until a contract has been formed and completed, and it will be effective when all its components are completed and ready to be effective. The contract in question will have its effects after completion and for the future in this case. However, according to some expediencies, the parties to the contract may agree to extend the effect of the contract to the past in order to achieve their interests. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the agreement of the parties on the generalization of the effects of the contract or its discharge in relation to the past is correct or invalid in terms of philosophical foundations. Therefore, the main question is what is the legal status of the parties’ agreement to generalize the effect of the contract compared to the past? The hypothesis is that legal propositions are not necessarily subject to the rules governing natural affairs. Legal propositions should be interpreted in a customary-rational way, and from this point of view, agreement on the effect of the contract in the past is correct and valid. The library resources in this article have been used with an analytical-descriptive method and it was concluded by using ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s theory of fictions that it is possible to generalize the effects of the contract to the past due to the fictionality of legal propositions and the necessity of using the customary-rational interpretation method of issues in this field. Therefore, the parties to the contract can extend the effects of the conclusion of contract and its dissolution to the past.

It is not hidden the position of thesis and research in the expansion of science and knowledge and the improvement of the boundaries of knowledge to anyone, but assigning its compilation in exchange for paying compensation to individuals and institutions, weakens and undermines the goals of scientific research and disrupts the order of the academic community. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the jurisprudential and legal ruling of thesis writing agreement for others by relying on public order and good morals, so that an effective step can be taken to prevent this problem by resorting to Sharīʿah and the law. The results obtained in this regard by a descriptive-analytical method indicate that reciprocal contract (commutative contract) of writing a thesis for others in Jaʿfarī jurisprudence and Iranian law is against public order and good morals and it is an illegitimate contract in this regard, in Jaʿfarī jurisprudence, and this private contract in Iranian law is not formed at the time of execution.

Nowadays divorce is in today`s societies, specifically in western countries, losing the negative viewpoint portraying as the dismantling force of family bonds, as it once had to face, and are showing tendency towards contractual dissolution of the said bonds. Parties tend to peacefully and as fast as possibly in reach, leave behind this period of their social and private lives and move forward. With the flow of multiple reforms through the years dating back to 2016, legislations to this day have tried to answer to some of the concerns regarding judicial divorce, elimination of the judge`s involvement in divorce procedures, stablishing divorce forms like divorce sans judge or divorce without judge, contractual interpretation of divorces etc. this article while glancing over these reforms and professing the historical events leading to and resulting from the said changes, craves for the weak points, side-effects, destructive aspects etc. to be highlighted and by specifying the strengths and offering comparative studies tries to answer to the all-important question of “would these reforms even dare to influence the current Iranian legal system in regards to divorce procedures in the right way? Considering the ever-rising rate of divorces (around the globe as in Iran), the destructive lingering effects of procedural delays, proper adoption of said reforms in order to put effective and influential suggestions forward, deems like never before necessary; Of course, respectful and true to the cultural, idealistic, licit and legitimate framework of the set boundaries of Iranian legal system.

Article 153 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, recognizing the bitter experience of the past, resulting from the conclusion of hegemonic treaties, has prohibited any contract that causes foreign domination of natural resources, economy, culture, etc. This Article seems to need to redefine the instances of contracts subject to domination because it can lead to misunderstandings. However, this paper seeks to redefine the instances of article 153 while defining "domination" and the scope of the concept of "alien", as well as answer the ambiguities in this field using an analytical-descriptive method, with library resources and opinions of the Guardian Council. This paper is based on the premise that the objectification of article 153 requires the relevant laws and its explanation and completion by the parliament, and the emptiness of ordinary law in defining the instances of article 153 makes the mentioned principle one of the suspended and silent articles. Therefore, the main finding of the present article is that the instances of the mentioned principle, including "other affairs of the country", can lead to misunderstandings and interpretations that can have profound effects on national interests.

The parties of the contract may agree on multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses. These clauses are usually negotiation, conciliation, mediation, or expert. The purpose of parties is to try to settle the disputes amicably before commencement of arbitration proceeding and avoid the costly process of arbitration, and strengthen their business-relationship. This article discusses about the validity, legal views about the nature of the multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses, its impact on jurisdiction of arbitration. There are three views about the nature of these clauses: Jurisdictional, Admissibility, Procedural. What the parties have stated in their contract indicates their intention. The nature of these clauses are closely linked to the parties’ intention at the time of their conclusion. The intent of the parties and the manner of arrangement of the clauses in the light of the applicable law, will determine the effect of these clauses on the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.

One of the issues of contract law is the presentation of criteria and effects of the division of contracts according to Imamieh and Iran's subject rights. Therefore, the main question of the research is what are the criteria and effects of the division of contracts in Imamieh jurisprudence and Iran's subject rights؟ The present research seeks to answer this main question and its related questions, so that, while examining the theories of jurists and lawyers in this regard, it can be a criterion consistent with Iranian law To divide the contracts headquarters from Imamieh jurisprudence and Iran's subject rights by analytical and citation method. The autonomous theory of research in the criteria and effects of the division of contracts headquarters is the integration of different criteria under the criteria of opposition and non-contradiction of contracts with the required rules and laws of the book and the age of comparison and its works.

This article studies the concept of the penalty clause in the Iranian Legal System. The authors have tried to study the relationship between this concept and discretion through the study of the existing theories about the concept of commitment and legal Provisions and judicial Provisions. For this reason, the penalty clause has been studied as one of the clear rules under the Obligations Law. The authors have tried to examine the fundamental principles, and legal articles cited in the field of the penalty clause and its legal implications in the validity of concepts such as obligation, damage, authority, and being bound over. In this study, an attempt has been made to highlight and study the problems in this concept while taking a critical approach.To do this, the authors have used a collection of library information while studying the literature on the subject. they summersied their suggestions at the end of the paper.

Nowadays, many infertile couples around the world have become parents through assisted reproductive technologies. In this study, we aim to examine the jurisprudential and legal aspects of artificial insemination, as our legal system is rooted in jurisprudence and without addressing its fundamental principles, it becomes difficult to establish legal rights for them. Therefore, in the jurisprudential examination, we first address the issue of permissibility or prohibition of using these artificial insemination methods, and then examine the legal status of these methods that determine the lineage of these children, and finally discuss the legal rights and obligations of the parties involved in the artificial insemination contract, as determining the child's lineage will clarify other issues such as custody and guardianship. New fertility or artificial insemination is a therapeutic approach that was developed in the late twentieth century to treat infertility in couples. This therapeutic method began in 1765 and eventually led to the treatment of infertility in humans, and among the methods used in this regard is the use of a surrogate or second husband's womb to place the fetus for growth until the moment of birth.

manufacturers produce unhealthy and defected works that not only wastes our resources but also makes a poor economy that leave us in a vulnerable state in this ever-Due to the uncompetitive economic status of our country, some food developing world. The most important matter to be considered is that it inflicts damage on the community health, while it distorts the public discipline and change the balance between production and consumption.  Introduction of basic customer rights across Europe, triggered formulation of a special law for protecting customers in Iran. However, it is imperfect due to the ambiguous method of compensating for losses. Hence, based on the principle of no harm, this essay tends both to find a legally protective umbrella for customers and develop a robust economy as a remedy for the inefficient laws enacted regarding civil liability and protecting customers against the complications of market. For this purpose, this essay introduces a food manufacturer as a sufficient and primary cause that inflict harm, and specifies that the manufacturer’s failure plays role only in ascertaining of the causal link; It also set asides the liability resulting from food production failures and substitute it with manufacturers’ sense of responsibility for the final results , safety assurance, and a perfect responsibility based on legal and jurisprudential principles.

The principle of "the effect of privity of contract " or the principle of "privity of contracts " is a well-known principle in the law of obligations, which is recognized as the principle in all Legal systems. Based on this principle, the obligations of the contract are liabilities of the parties of the contract, and the benefits belong to the parties, and it does not create obligations for third parties as third parties cannot expect profit from the contract. But the principle of the privity of fault in terms of the possibility of a third party citing the violation of the contractual obligation seems to be against the principle of privity of contracts, and this question can be raised If in a contract, obligations are violated and damage is caused to a third party or parties, can this violation of the contract by the parties of the contract be cited as a fault? In French law, the discussion of the privity of contractual fault is raised, and in English law, the examination of some opinions shows the tendency of this legal system to raise this issue, which is raised in this article with a comparative study of Iranian law. It seems that contractual fault has a relative concept and despite the principle of privity of contract, there is an advantage for the third party to rely on breach of contractual obligation to claim damages.

Today, online stores sell goods and services through online contracts, exchanging emails with the other party, or filling out a specific form on the website by one party. Online contracts may be executed by presenting the terms of the contract to one party and then asking the applicant to click on the words "I agree" or something similar. The number of consumers who use online platforms to fulfill their shopping needs has increased, and online stores have responsibilities for the intermediary role and the platform they provide for online buying and selling. From the legal point of view, two types of contractual or non-contractual responsibilities can be considered for these stores. Currently, these types of internet businesses are very popular among users, but in any case, we should look for a space to increase the security of this type of service and secure it, while taking care of and protecting consumer rights; because at present, with the very wide growth of this type of websites and online stores in different fields, we have witnessed the provision of services in the fields of sports, culture and leisure, electronic devices such as audio and visual devices, household, personal and office, real estate and land, vehicles, services and training, supplies and business, and even recruitment and employment or expression of job opportunities, etc. Since online platforms often act as "gateways to control and limit interactions in a system", the first question is whether online platforms and online stores can still be considered simply as intermediaries or should they be suppliers. The second question is whether platforms, as dominant channels in the market, may be held liable to their customers for infringements caused primarily by platform suppliers. Finally, the third question is whether there is a necessary connection between the first and second questions, namely that the platform operator may be held liable to its customers while it may not be treated as a mere intermediary, it may be treated as a supplier of goods and services provided by Platform Providers. Regarding the activity of online stores and their responsibility for their actions or others, it cannot be assumed that they are not absolutely responsible. The important issue is that in online shopping, the buyer makes a transaction that the seller has not seen closely, therefore, the necessity of such purchases, due to its nature, requires more support from the buyer. Because in such transactions, the buyer does not have detailed information about the seller of the goods, their credit, and the transaction, and the burden of the purchase risk is on the shoulders of the buyer. For this reason, as well as for the specialization of the subject and its great application and importance, in this research, an attempt will be made to examine the civil liability of online stores in the laws of Iran and the European Union. In relation to the foundations of civil responsibility of online stores, the theory of fault should be accepted as the main basis of civil responsibility in the laws of Iran and the European Union. In fact, where the providers of their Internet services and goods commit harmful acts, their liability is still based on fault. However, regarding the responsibility of internet sellers, you can also refer to other bases. The important thing about online stores is that concluding a sales contract through the internet in this category of stores should not create doubt that online stores are not subject to the general rules of civil liability. On the contrary, it should be stated that such stores are subject to general rules regarding civil liability rules; because buying or selling through online stores differs from traditional contracts in only a few specific cases; the most important of which is the method of concluding a contract. In other words, except for a few minor cases, in other cases, buying from an online store is not much different from buying from a real store; therefore, in relation to the civil liability of online stores, two types of liability can be realized, contractual and non-contractual liability. This type of separation in civil liability has been accepted both in the civil law of Iran and in the civil law of the European Union. On the other hand, in order to realize the civil liability of online stores in two areas of contractual and non-contractual liability, certain conditions are necessary. So in the field of contractual liability, the existence of a valid contract, breach of contract, and the existence of damage caused by the breach of contract are necessary, and in the field of non-contractual liability of the online store, the occurrence of loss, harmful action and the relationship of causation is necessary. It is suggested that cyberspace and internet stores are very suitable for millions of jobs. On the other hand, the Internet is a useful tool for marketing various services. In this regard, the creation of up-to-date and applicable laws as well as the amendment of existing laws are more important than ever. For this reason, it is suggested that, especially in Iranian law, laws in the field of online stores should be formulated in a specific way, and in these laws, the civil liability of this type of store should be determined clearly, inspired by the principles of civil responsibility and not limited to accepting one of the opinions and principles. Laws that, in addition to preventing the occurrence of computer crimes, should provide the opportunity for legal internet businesses to operate and grow, and this means that the laws are fair. In addition to the definition of platforms, the law that is developed for this purpose should include the providers and users of the internet platform for the purpose of electronic commerce, the law that is formulated for this purpose must state the criteria and criteria accepted in the legal analysis, of course, a mechanism for the purpose of floating the bon and the ability to generalize the criteria. Claims between parties (both platform, supplier, and user) should be considered. Also, the cases where the rules related to transactions do not respond to the new needs are written and govern the relations of the parties.

In order to strengthen the legal relations of individuals and prevent any instability and instability in the obligations and implementation of contracts that lead to disorder in the economic and social relations of individuals in society, in all countries and worldwide, The provisions of the contracts have become binding. The principle of necessity also means that individuals must abide by their own commitments and agreements and consider them respectable and binding. All contracts entered into in accordance with the law follow certain principles and rules. The legislature has also introduced and reviewed these common principles and rules as the "General Rules of Contracts." The first principle that the legislator has dealt with in these articles is the principle of necessity, and this is the same principle that the jurists call "the principle of necessity". The literal meaning of the word principle and the customary and religious structure of this principle in sale is necessary; That is, the intention of the people to buy and sell is that the original owner's relationship with the property is severed, and he becomes alienated from it, and the cucumber is an external right that is placed for one or both parties and is revocable. The meaning and concept of the principle of necessity in legal terms is that, when a contract is concluded correctly, the principle is that it is necessary between the parties and they must be faithful to the obligations they have made. Therefore, any contract that is not specified as permissible is necessary and neither party can terminate it except in certain cases.

The currency system of the country has been in turmoil in recent years due to the imposition of international sanctions against Iran, and illegal currency brokers and traders have fueled this turmoil. Meanwhile, some unauthorized foreign exchange brokers and dealers have further provoked the turmoil. Unfortunately, by forming groups of hundreds persons in real life and virtual environments, some of the brokers attempt transactions called “foreign exchange value tomorrow” something which, according to economic studies by the central bank of Islamic republic of Iran, have created disturbances in the Iranian economic system. foreign exchange value tomorrow transactions include those transactions when the parties, without giving or taking, postpone foreign currency delivery to tomorrow or some days later, while most of the time no delivery takes place, and the parties just regard the exchange rate difference. According to the regulations of foreign currency exchange and amendment of anti-smuggling of goods and currency act, foreign exchange value tomorrow transactions, are considered illegal.

The right of lien in Iranian law has been explained by jurists, considering Article 377 of the Civil Code. This article is included in the submission of the contract of sale and the jurists mainly deal with this article only in the topic of the right of lien. However, attention to other regulations, jurisprudential analysis, and comparison with foreign laws demonstrate two types of liens can be identified in Iranian law: 1) equitable lien (in cases where there is a balance between the parties), 2) possessory lien (the legal right for a creditor to preserve the property of the debtor). This is while the review of the equitable lien in the works of legal writers did not leave room for an independent review of the lien of possession, even though this type of right of lien has been present in Iranian law since 1/6/1312 (1933) with the approval of the law on the debt of immigrants to guest houses and boarding houses. This article, through the descriptive-analytical method (library study), seeks to identify possessory lien as an independent institution in Iranian law with a comparative study.For this purpose, a comprehensive definition of the right of lien is provided in the present research: "The right of Lien is the legal right for a person that is settled in the property of others until the fulfillment of their debt and obligation." This definition, in addition to including various types of the right of lien by passing the traditional point of view, also opens the way for the use of other types of right of lien, including maritime lien, which is itself one of the type of the right of lien in possession, in Iranian law.

This article is a comparative study of the concept of penalty clause in Iranian and Egyptian law. In this article, the authors have studied the concept of commitment to the validity of the more fundamental idea of commitment. For this reason, they have tried to provide a newer research proposal in this field. Since it is expected that comparative studies from a practical aspect will lead to the improvement and excellence of legal institutions and the recognition of deficiencies and their elimination in different legal systems, the authors of this article have tried to study the philosophical foundations of each of the compared systems. have been placed, regulate the existing laws, procedures and legal institutions of the present work. Based on the results of this article, the authors suggest that any study about the concept of commitment in Iranian law should be based on understanding the idea of commitment in Shia jurisprudence. This article has also shown how the foundations of Sharia, Shiite jurisprudence, and customary law, French law in Iran's civil law have led to the emergence of challenges for formulating the concept of obligation. A challenge that somehow existed in the era before the victory of the Iranian Islamic Revolution.