جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "credentials" در نشریات گروه "فقه و حقوق"

scholars and jurists, mainly by challenging between facts and credentials. They have disputed the jurisprudents' rational argumentations as put forward in their works.   By induction in this regard, we achieve three important views: general prohibition of the use of rational rules in jurisprudential inference, non-prohibition of quoting rational rules in jurisprudential citation, permissibility of citing to rational rules, and promising in detail among the rules of reason.   Adopting a basis for this issue depends on the analysis of two minor and major debates; the minor discussion is that whether the Osuli and jurisprudential propositions are factual or credential.  Assuming on its credential nature, it is argued that if the major issue regarding the citation of rational principles in credential discussion is true or not.   In this paper, with the aim of focusing on the position of rational rules in jurisprudential inference, the authors support the rationalist principles and by analyzing the principles and arguments in both minor and major debates have focused on the problem of facts and credentials confusion to prove this assumption that in order to deduce the rules of jurisprudence, based on the real support that religious laws and credentials  have, we can use the rules of real and rational sciences, and in this regard, we will express a new detailed theory and standard to cite the rules of reason in deriving religious rules.

By holding elections and selecting people's deputies in different areas, the Ministry of the Interior must issue a credential to each elected person, this credential is that the credentials of the representative have been legally approved, and he has been able to, after passing through various stages, the required votes and Get into the House. The credentials are in fact the passport of the electorate to enter the parliament. The United Kingdom does not have a constitution, and the sources of its basic rights are the same as those which apply to the general rules of law, which are: statutory or substantive law, customary law, judicial procedure. In addition, the English law has not yet been interpreted, and the views of the authors of the books and professors of the university are of great value in this field. This research aims to study the comparative study of credit status in the legal system of Iran and Britain and conducted by descriptive analytical method It is accepted that the results indicate that the reputation of the representatives of the representatives in the legal system of Iran and England is completely different, so that the credentials of the representatives in the legal system of Iran are approved by the delegates themselves, while in the English legal system by the members of the Supreme Court Approved or rejected.