A comparative study of credit status in the legal system of Iran and Britain

By holding elections and selecting people's deputies in different areas, the Ministry of the Interior must issue a credential to each elected person, this credential is that the credentials of the representative have been legally approved, and he has been able to, after passing through various stages, the required votes and Get into the House. The credentials are in fact the passport of the electorate to enter the parliament. The United Kingdom does not have a constitution, and the sources of its basic rights are the same as those which apply to the general rules of law, which are: statutory or substantive law, customary law, judicial procedure. In addition, the English law has not yet been interpreted, and the views of the authors of the books and professors of the university are of great value in this field. This research aims to study the comparative study of credit status in the legal system of Iran and Britain and conducted by descriptive analytical method It is accepted that the results indicate that the reputation of the representatives of the representatives in the legal system of Iran and England is completely different, so that the credentials of the representatives in the legal system of Iran are approved by the delegates themselves, while in the English legal system by the members of the Supreme Court Approved or rejected.