جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "مدلسازی گروهی" در نشریات گروه "مدیریت"

Medical or therapeutic biotechnology is the development of research tools, the diagnosis, development and delivery of drugs and vaccines through the use of cellular systems or processes and biological molecules. A very important strategic choice of technology-oriented enterprises in the biopharmaceutical industry is the commercialization strategy. The strategy of purchasing and merging as one of the strategies for commercialization and biomedical drugs has been less considered and researched in the research literature than other strategies. The purpose of this study is to design a comprehensive model of commercialization strategy, merge and acquisition in the country's biopharmaceutical industry based on a consecutive qualitative-quantitative mixed approach. To analyze the research literature, the meta synthesis method and to content validation of the proposed model, the group modeling technique based on the opinion of experts and in a small part based on the survey strategy and the partial least squares technique have been used. The results showed that among the seven categories of predictors, including; Resource complementarity, information asymmetry, experience of alliance between buyer and purchased company, related purchasing experience, cultural, geographical, and business proximity, knowledge and resource transfer (functional, operational, and managerial) and integration process and performance category as The consequence of this strategy, in the bio-pharmaceutical industry of the country, the only issue is the complementarity of resources for companies active in this industry as a predictor.

Considering the problem of funding start-ups because of their nature, some entrepreneurs developed crowdfunding in which funding is done via the Internet and social network instead of traditional methods. Crowdfunding is a complicated and dynamic phenomenon due to the fact that it has many models with distinctive characteristics, numerous stakeholders with different intentions, interdisciplinary nature, and differences in various countries due to diverse cultural, social, economic and technological conditions of such countries. In addition, studies conducted on this method are not significant in number and they have been conducted in an exploratory and partial manner so as to offer a preliminary understanding. As a result, it is necessary to adopt an approach capable of understanding complex-dynamic phenomena so as to be able to explain crowdfunding. The present paper designs a system dynamics model of crowdfunding for support of new Iranian knowledge-based IT start-ups so as to highlight the complexities and dynamics of the method. The sources for the development of the model include relevant literature (document model building), public opinions (crowd model building) and experts’ viewpoints (group model building). The results of model simulation suggest that the revenue of the platforms in their expansion, the existence of monitoring mechanisms, evaluation, and screening in the platforms have a significant effect on increasing the attraction of investors and capital, but activity in social networks is not very effective.

In recent years, in system dynamics society has increased attention to qualitative approaches. One method of extracting models of qualitative system dynamics has been many used is a Group Model Building. In this method, clients are involved in the modeling process. But it has not been systematically studied to assess the effectiveness of Group modeling. Systematically assess is important because the following reasons: 1) understand the impact of this approach on the customer and target organizations; 2) Enhance the effectiveness of a modeling process. In this paper we have evaluated a Group modeling that was used in the design of aviation Technology Park by a questionnaire was filled out by participants after modeling sessions. The results of this survey indicate that participants acknowledged the importance, usefulness and the efficiency of these sessions. Also in the regard of meetings, open discussion, external facilitator and meetings as a group, using cause and effect diagrams, images and graphics to visualize the process, meetings outside the office environment, using workbook and the clear instructions in the meetings are important. Participants Expressed the Informal meetings have been useful.

In recent years, in system dynamics society has increased attention to qualitative approaches. One method of extracting models of qualitative system dynamics has been many used is a Group Model Building. In this method, clients are involved in the modeling process. Based on Participants mental models are extracted key structures and latent variables in the system. In this regard, compare the group models with reference models from the literature can be a way to test and evaluate a model. And provide new insights. In this paper we evaluate and compare models of group modeling sessions extracted from the project "Designing Aviation Technology Park" with the reference model derived from the literature review, by using the distance ratio approach of three levels, including the elements, the causal loops and the full model level. As became clear from the results of this approach the MDR = 6.84 which indicates that the model as the reference model and the group models were similar. EDR and LDR values indicate between model elements and the loops level were similar. In conclusion we can say that the model is a valid model and the resulting models are consistent with other studies in the literature.