جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « همکاری فناورانه » در نشریات گروه « مدیریت »

Technological collaboration in the global value chain of the copper industry has attracted the attention of large and small companies in this industry due to the increase in productivity, smartness and design of new products. Iran's National Copper Industries Company, as the parent organization of copper industries, is the subject of this research in the field of technological cooperation. In this regard, the aim of the current research is to identify the drivers of technological collabration of the National Iranian Copper Industries Company with knowledge-based companies in order to achieve higher value-added copper base products, job creation and profitability. This research was carried out with thematic analysis method of Attride-Stirling approach and data collection by library method and conducting semi-structured interviews with purposeful sampling method with 26 copper industry experts. As a result of this research, 26 effective drivers for the cooperation between the National Copper Industries Company of Iran and knowledge-based companies were identified, which are in seven categories: unpredictable environmental disturbances, development plans and policies of the country's mining sector, requirements for cooperation with knowledge-based companies, industry requirements Downstream of copper, the requirements of Iran's National Copper Industries Company, the challenges of international technological collabration and access to energy carriers were placed.

Creating demand for technological products, financing innovation, outsourcing research and development, etc. are among the effective actions of large firms in interaction with knowledge-based firms. On the other hand, knowledge-based firms can also play an effective role in meeting the technological needs of large firms with their scientific and technical ability do However, the interaction of these firms is facing problems due to various reasons and the cooperation of these two pillars of Iran's knowledge-based economy is far from its desired position. In the meantime, government policies can play a significant role in facilitating these connections. South Korea is one of the governments that has taken effective steps to develop interaction between firms by passing the Law on Mutually Beneficial Cooperation between Large Firms and Small Firms and forming the Ministry of Small and Medium Enterprises and Startups. This research, with a comparative analysis and a comparative study of the policies for the development of technological cooperation between South Korea and Iran and the division of the policy tools of these two governments into three categories of tools including tools for stimulating demand, tools for stimulating supply and tools for improving cooperation infrastructure, looking for solutions to develop these cooperations in Iran Is. The focus on supply stimulation tools and cooperation infrastructures is remarkable in Iran, but unlike South Korea, which has used important tools to stimulate demand, there is a serious gap in demand stimulation tools in Iran.

Imposing sanctions on some industries in Iran over the years have led many large industries to seek supplies from domestic companies. In these circumstances, and given that many needs are met through the collaboration of companies, the development of technological collaboration seems essential. Therefore, many large companies are looking for technological collaboration with other companies. Despite the need for technological collaboration in the current situation, technological collaboration faces serious challenges and in some cases this collaboration does not take shape. Hence, the government could develop collaborations by establishing policy tools. So, this research aims to identify the policy tools for the development of technological collaboration between industries and knowledge-based companies to achieve the desired situation in country. In this regard, by conducting purposeful interviews with experts in the field, the policy tools for the development of technological collaboration were extracted and examined by content analysis. These tools can be classified into three categories: supply stimulation tools, demand stimulation tools and infrastructure improvement tools.

One of the best methods to understanding our historical failures and successes in technological and industrial cooperation is focus on the lived experience of individuals and organizations that are directly involved in an event or the formation of events related to that field. Accordingly, in this research by semi- unstructured interviews, we have been attempted to focus on the story of one of the former project engineers of the IDRO, Dr. Dariush Mahjoobi, in projects related to joint ventures, both in the pre-revolutionary period and in the post-revolutionary period and explain the differences of pre and post revolution era. The research results show that the kind of insight on the concept of technology is very important in the technological cooperation and the aim of policy-maker from cooperation with foreign (development of internal technological capabilities or local content requirement). So, when our focus instead of equipment and machinery, concentrates on achieving the knowledge of relationship in production procedure and flowsheet of necessary requirement in one manufacturer and at the end lead to layout design, the results of the cooperation are more effective. Accordingly, in the food industry, the turn-key approach before the revolution had turned Iran into an importer of equipment. But the experience of Sanandaj Milk Project after the revolution and mastering the Functional design allows the project to be managed according to local needs.

Buy back contracts have been one of the most common upstream contracts in the oil industry. This investment method allows the government to attract foreign capital and technical services and knowledge, while at the same time reducing the cost of foreign trade and increasing export capacity. On the other hand, Learning is one of the most important functions of technological collaboration, to which the success of collaborations will largely depend. This study, is a qualitative study with a case study strategy, attempted to determine the dimensions of learning in buy back contracts  with a case study on the North Azadegan Field Development Contract.  Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document review. Purposeful sampling was used to interview the experts in this project. Data analysis was done by thematic analysis and a qualitative research model was designed by MAXQDA. According to the findings of this study, the technological learning framework has five main themes including contract features, infrastructure, learner characteristics, external peer characteristics, and the nature of knowledge and technology. The findings also indicate that informal and informal factors have a direct and indirect impact on technological learning, and their attention is very important.

Today, the development of technological collaboration is one of the important strategies for developing resources, capabilities and gaining competitive advantage among organizations. This kind of collaboration among small and SME firms is important for creating significant effects on their success. One of the important pillars to create and maintain partnerships is to create the necessary capabilities to enter and use these collaborations. In this paper, we have tried to examine the various capabilities of several SME technology companies through interviews with corporate executives and partners, and studying documents and observation and by analyzing the theme, based on a few case studies. The results show that the capabilities required in collaborative technology in firms include four types of interoperability and continuity capabilities, product / service support capabilities, product / service collaboration support capabilities, and the same or complementary capabilities for collaboration that a set of The capabilities are based on the type of collaboration and its purpose in these sets. These capabilities are the basis for the formation and continuity of cooperation as well as the amount of operation and the result of cooperation for the firm.