جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « هنر » در نشریات گروه « مدیریت »

The evolution of economic schools with the concepts of objectivism (conventional school), subjectivism (Austrian school), Holism (German historical school), and finally collectivism or collective originality (institutional school) shows that despite the development of each school in completing and evolving the schools before it and trying to solve human problems in socio-economic interactions, these schools still have fundamental shortcomings theoretically. Also, evidence from the real world, citing the arguments of several thinkers such as Husserl, Mises, Hannah Arendt, etc., shows that the deviation of the capitalist system and its ruling ideology has become the cause of authoritarianism and autocracy of great powers and taking over the stage of human life. Therefore, the necessity of forming a new paradigm and school in economics is inevitable. And that is for a human being who, on the one hand, according to his own nature, is adorned with reason and proof and is cognate with the comprehensiveness of freedom and autocracy, and on the other hand, he is faced with uncertainty and indeterminacy, and precisely because of this, the modern school must be able to, like the form and a guiding figure, determine the buffer boundaries between right and wrong and show him the straight path; The rest is the choice of the human being, whether he chooses laziness or piety, good or evil, and directs his behavior and actions accordingly. Related to this intellectual atmosphere, the formation of the first economic school from the Dark Ages to the intellectual and cultural revolution and then empiricism was discussed earlier, and in this field, an opportunity arose to draw a road map based on the comprehensiveness of scientific thinking, by analyzing the phenomena at the level Appearances (causal relationships) have been addressed to thinking and reflecting on the essence and inner hidden behind the appearances, and finally, by unifying the achievements of these two stages, the ground for creating a new idea and thought based on the synthetic approach will be provided. The result of the abstraction of all efforts shows that art, the principles of self-knowledge, and the manifestation of existential capacities (comprehensiveness of genius) are necessary as formative elements for the modern school structure around the comprehensiveness of the transcendental concept of freedom. Art is a symbol of freedom and a factor of separation from material relations, which previously, using inspiration and intuition, puts forward a new path for creation and creativity beyond human will; The principles of self-knowledge and pure practical reason, which give meaning and strengthen freedom and art, and manifest those talents, abilities and genius deposited in human existence, which are prone to actualization. Mixing these three items gives a standard, measure, and criterion that can use whatever is appropriate and compatible with it in requirements, deeds, and behavior and whatever is false and unjust from the foundation and maxim of individual and society put aside.

The artist and his artwork are directly and indirectly influenced by the society in which he is present. Different times and periods of the history of that community and, in nature, cultural and economic conditions are important factors in the economic circulation of art. With the passage of time and the concept and efficiency of art and the emergence of new artistic currents, the taste and criterion of acceptance of the works and, in nature, have changed that kind of audience and its buyer. Traditional customers in the past centuries, which have been the main buyers of artworks and important factors in the development of the art economy in the history of art, have become a variety of layers and strata today. It is assumed that by time and being in different periods, the type and criterion of acceptance of artworks (part of which is determined by the art community for the people) changes, which, by nature, witness a variable economic turnover in We are every period, and by separating the types of art, the possibility of statistical and expert review of this is accelerated. This study seeks to examine the social factors affecting the art economy. As a result, for a detailed examination of these factors and their economic census, it can be distinguished by separating the artwork and its disciplines and subdivisions in the economic turnover conducted in the field of art of artworks. Kurds, as well as identifying strengths and strengths, can be offset by the lack of turnover of that type of art, and by appointing the expert, specialized in examining solutions to their problems in the form of a branch. O and separately

Some definitions of accounting, even in reputable and official sources, generally emphasize the art of accounting rather than its science. For example, the American Society of Certified Public Accountants at Bolton No. 1 defines its accounting terminology as the art of recording, classifying, and summarizing financial events. Is accounting really a science or an art? If accounting is an art, what is the characteristic of science that accounting lacks? If accounting is a science, then some of the definitions presented do not seem to be correct. In general, does the science or art of defining accounting make a difference? Many experts have avoided defining science or art, and the definitions proposed by some experts have not been agreed upon. In this article, first some of the most important definitions and characteristics of science and art are stated and then the issue of whether accounting is science or art is examined. Finally, we conclude that one should not be skeptical of science. What is very important is the usefulness of accounting and its product. However, considering accounting as a science or art depends on certain criteria and characteristics. In recent decades, the history of accounting has shown extensive scientific research in order to find the true place of accounting among various sciences Create.

Organizational culture is a new notion to the field of knowledge management and organizational behavior. Culture has been traditionally used to describe life quality of human society; however, organizational culture and whatever concerned with people's action and behavior in an organization have been rarely investigated. Knowledge and understanding what builds up organizational culture and the way it is established and sustained assist us to justify organizational behavior in the best way possible. Through understanding organizational culture exercising control and modeling staff behavior, rendering identity to them creating group commitment and stabilizing totality of an organization are made feasible. This study was an attempt to investigate organizational culture in Imam Ali University based on Daniel Denison's model as a common and agreed –upon approach.Findings revealed that the university moderate and relatively higher measures in terms of all four aspects of the model including engagement, adaptation, adaptability and mission; however, the adaptation and mission criteria were evaluated as the highest in rank. Nevertheless, the university was evaluated weak in terms of coordination and development.On the flexibility– stability continuum, stability loads more, but on that of the external –internal one no significant difference was recorded. In other words, these factors enjoyed equal load, though internal tendency loaded a bit more than the external one.