جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « knowledge management » در نشریات گروه « هنر و معماری »

Theoretical foundations as the epistemological core of architecture are the basis of its identity. The undefined separation of different aspects of contemporary architecture from its theoretical foundations has led to: their independent and unbalanced growth, the formation of technology-based design instead of theoretical-based design, and, in general, the reduction of the influence of theoretical foundations. The resulting problems in various aspects of architecture, especially in design issues, along with the expansion of the applications of environmental psychology in architecture, has doubled the need to recognize and redefine the concepts, position and application of the theoretical foundations of architecture in a comprehensive and systematic way.
One of the many drawbacks of the vast majority of man-made schools is that they neglect other points and aspects by focusing on a particular point or aspect of a particular phenomenon or subject, and the same is true of architecture.Late schools have often focused on one subject (history, individual, collective, industry, nature, etc.) and have, as a result, forgotten the totality and universality of the living environment and naturally the needs of man and human life.While the relative comprehensiveness of an organized discourse was witnessed only in the age of modernism. That is, we have (regardless of direction and results) an organization based on organized and comprehensive theoretical foundations in the era of modernism.
The emergence of a scientific view of theoretical foundations as the lifeblood of architecture probably coincided with the beginning of postmodernism and the expansion of the construction of architectural schools. That is, in 1960 (AD) and in the same circumstances that, with the formation of the view of philosophy of science, systematic thinking and framework thinking to various sciences, other disciplines also realized the need to have a scientific framework for themselves.After that, the theoretical foundations of architecture were formed as a basis for which different parts of architecture directly or indirectly derive their content and processes, either from the theories reflected in it, or for the validity of the content. They themselves use it as a reference. Such a pivotal role and identity creation for theoretical foundations, expanded its scope, content and application in architectural studies.
The current fundamental research, in a qualitative way, seeks to examine the various opinions in library sources about the current situation of the theoretical foundations of contemporary architecture, through analysis and interpretation. The important purpose of this research is to identify the factors, their relationship and their basis on contemporary theoretical foundations. The important application of this research is in the practical introduction of systems thinking to the theoretical foundations of architecture, this will pave the way for the theory and production of science based on the pivotal and basic role of theoretical foundations. In the absence of such a view of theoretical foundations, we will see the deepening of content-knowledge gaps as well as method-knowledge gaps in architecture, due to passivity and several approaches in the field of theoretical foundations to design, research, education and new architectural technologies

The most important sources of Peter Drucker, investment or other natural resources and labor are not the fundamental source of knowledge is and will be Av,. The advent of the organizations that are based on knowledge, innovation and commercialization of ideas Hast, the business world has become inevitable. Several models have been proposed to manage knowledge. This research is descriptive method used for collecting information and library studies and reviews of the latest books and related research, as well as the Internet is used. The conceptual model consists of four stages of fishing, sorting and refinement, development and dissemination, and application and commercialization of knowledge, and focuses on four areas of tacit knowledge explicit Drvny, Drvny,Dansh outer implicit and explicit knowledge and classification of external knowledge been presented. In the end, the table, the proposed model is compared with other models of knowledge management.

The overuse of unstable urban income to develop cities has created a lot of problems for communities. Indeed, continuing this trend has posed a serious challenge to cities and regions.

Investigating the role of knowledge-based areas in urban and regional development based on theoretical foundations and global experiences.

Theoretical and library methods have been used to study the theoretical foundations and experimental records.

Innovation is one of the main pillars of knowledge-based cities that is the focus of interest in recent decades. One of the outcomes of innovation areas is the formation of knowledge-based cities. Hence, city-regions are the center of growth and the center of knowledge. Therefore, the competitive advantage of urban areas will not be based only on natural resources or cheap labor; indeed, the role of knowledge becomes more important. The process of innovation actually addresses what makes knowledge valuable and how it is created through interactive and complex relationships in an institutional setting. In other words, the key elements of this complex are universities, industries, and governments. If they connect optimally, good development will be achieved through knowledge-based cities and regions. The global experiences have represented this fact clearly.

The link between creative individuals, major investors, and urban and regional rulers has provided a conducive environment for the emergence of a new concept in the scientific community. This emerging concept has been called Knowledge-Based City. The two driving forces in the formation of cities and areas of knowledge have changed the spatial structure of planning and divided it into three levels of regional planning, urban planning, and urban design. Given the important role of the relationship between urban and regional planning in a coherent hierarchical system, It is important to focus on the regional innovation system and the coherent relationship between the levels of regional planning, urban planning and urban design in the creation and operation of knowledge-based cities.

The prevalence of non-spatial approaches and physical determinism in the management of spatial changes and solving urban problems in the Tehran Metropolitan has led to a situation in which urban plans such as Tehran’s Master Plan (2007) and the 22 District plans of Tehran metropolitan (2012) have been less than successful in fulfilling expectations regarding the urban spatial system and uncertainties affecting such systems. Dealing with urban problems and uncertainties affecting strategic decision-making including those associated with the planning environment, the guiding values of the planning process, and finally those associated with the decisions made by other stakeholders through strategic spatial planning in an era characterized by an accumulation of knowledge and information, would require knowledge management. Urban Planning problems due to spatial and political nature of planning will not fit into traditional information systems. This fact shifts the emphasis and application of information systems and “knowledge-management” in urban planning from a mere technical to a broader context suitable for the rationale of a strategic spatial planning. Knowledge-management as a set of procedures, infrastructures, technical and managerial tools is a designed process towards creating, sharing and leveraging information and knowledge within and around organizations. The absence of an urban knowledge management system has increased the dynamism and complexity of urban problems. In fact, creation of such a system as an important component of the efficiency of any urban planning system has been largely overlooked in both planning research and practice. This paper is an attempt to answer two basic questions: first, what challenges does Tehran’s urban planning system face from the perspective of a knowledge-based strategic spatial planning system based on the principles of knowledge management? And second, what is the appropriate management model to be applied in Tehran’s urban planning system? Dealing with these two questions will help us achieve the main purpose of this paper: enhancing Tehran’s urban planning system through application of the principles of strategic spatial planning and knowledge management (knowledge-based strategic spatial planning). To this end, a qualitative research approach based on a two-stage descriptive-analytic and analytic-prescriptive process has been adopted. Systematic review of the research literature constitutes the first stage of this methodology. The second stage deals with "progressive abstraction problem-finding", focus group method, content analysis and the “conceptual suitability”. Our findings indicate that knowledge management enhances the efficiency of Tehran’s urban planning system in the framework of the strategic spatial planning approach through the generation and application of all types of knowledge, providing the context for learning from knowledge, creating a flexible knowledge base, promoting knowledge exchange, raising public awareness and the promotion of a knowledge application culture. However, the absence of belief in knowledge management and strategic thinking within the formal institutional structures (such as the legal system, governance and organizations) and informal institutions (such as culture, history and public beliefs) constitutes the main challenge facing Tehran’s urban planning system.

The goal of Knowledge Management is to maximize profitability and increase organizational effectiveness. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of knowledge management on competitive advantage with emphasis on the role of intermediary of technology innovation in the beautification organization of Tehran. The method of this research was descriptive and correlation research was a structural equation type. The statistical population of this research includes employees of the beautification organization of Tehran city, which numbered 430 people. 196 of them participated in the study by random sampling method. They responded to knowledge management questionnaires, technology innovation and competitive advantage. Reliability and validity of the tools were examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, composite reliability, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that reliability and validity were acceptable for tools. Data analysis was done at descriptive and inferential levels. In the inferential part, Pearson correlation tests and structural equations are used by least squares (PLS) method. SPSS21 and SMARTPLS software are used to analyze the research data. The results showed that knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on technology innovation. Knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on competitive advantage. Technology innovation has a positive and significant effect on competitive advantage. Knowledge management has a positive indirect and significant indirect effect on competitive advantage.

Successful implementation of knowledge management in an organization requires that various organizational factors, certain features of coherence and coordination are necessary. And there are gaps and inconsistencies between these factors hinder the successful implementation of knowledge management, will be. Thus, for successful implementation of knowledge management, organization as a whole needs to be looked at and considered all these factors and their status in the organization are identified and analyzed. This paper explores the barriers to knowledge management, Airports Holding Country in country, paid, and then will be prioritized. After evaluation techniques available to achieve a response, Analytic Hierarchy Process as the most suitable method was selected. To determine the priority of hierarchical analysis, comparison matrix formed and compared to determine their compatibility using the formula rate adaptation, adjustment range, all comparisons were calculated. The results confirmed that the pair comparison is carried out, the adjustment was appropriate. The final results of the main obstacles to prioritize proves that in order to measure cultural factors, human factors, technical factors, external factors and structural factors are the degree of priority. Five obstacles in order of preference, lack of planning and implementing activities in the field of culture and exchange of knowledge, lack of confidence based on knowledge sharing environment, lack of adequate support for the activities of the organizational culture creation and transfer of knowledge, lack of senior management support knowledge management and lack of access to information and knowledge, organizations are required by the national and international level.

Nowadays knowledge sharing constitutes a determinant role in Development of different organizations and industries as one of the components of Knowledge management. Considering the increasing importance of knowledge as the key factor of creating and sustaining competitive advantages, organizations are making serious efforts looking for effective ways to share knowledge among their employees. Knowledge sharing is an essential integral of knowledge management and Advances in organizational activities is attributed to creative employees. This paper aims to present a model describing the association between Knowledge sharing and workforce creativity. In this regard, contributing factors to workforce creativity and Knowledge sharing understanding was considered and required data was collected through a field survey. LISREL software package was used to model the relations between the variables. The Results of the study indicates a positive direct relation between knowledge sharing and employee’s creativity.

Today, in most societies social life of citizens is associated with medical centers. These centers is considered important area of citizenship and humanity originality. Therefore due to the cultural aspects and citizenship considerations is necessary and logical in order to provide more quality services. In this view, the goal of current research is the study of knowledge culture and organizational citizenship behavior situation as well as assessing the relationship between them. The present study is descriptive type and performed by correlation method. The statistical population including all of the nurses in the studied hospital that according to provided statistics they are 205. Among them 153 persons were selected as sample. Tow questionnaires were used to collect required data. Cronbach&rsquos &alpha was used to determine the reliability of the questionnaires that the reliability coefficient were 0/89 and 0/93. Descriptive statistical methods were used for classification, producing tables, drawing charts, and calculating the means and standard deviations. To examine the statistical assumptions, inferential tests were used. The tests used were the one-sample t-test for mean significance of each variable, one-way ANOVA (F) for integrity or compatibility of member answers based on their personal and organizational specifications. The tests was done by SPSS. Data analysis revealed that, there is positive and significant correlation knowledge culture and organizational citizenship are appropriate. Finally the conclusions and suggestions of the research were between knowledge culture and organizational citizenship that is Rxy= 0/67. Moreover the situation of presented.