جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « medical hadiths » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

Hadiths of the innocents (pbuh) contain medical data and a wide variety of topics related to the health of the human body, and a significant amount of them are about the prevention of diseases. Benefiting from medical hadiths, like any collection of information, requires accurate recognition, organization and categorization by relying on the relationships between variables rather than by analytically comparing their similarities, differences, properties, etc. be identified and applied. According to this statement, the question is, which species are there in the medical hadiths of Imam Reza (a.s.)? This research with a descriptive-analytical method in the statistical community of the narrations of Imam Reza (a.s.) in the field of disease prevention, from the medical encyclopedia of Mohammadi Rohimari, which facilitated their study by collecting medical narrations, as well as Jame-al-Ahadith software. It is written to find first-hand sources in the citation The result is that these narrations are classified into three types: "names of diseases, medicines and instructions", "properties of substances and instructions" and "maintaining body health without the name of a specific disease"; Their ratio with the total narratives of the statistical population was measured under each species and presented in the results table.

Considering the abundance of medical narrations in Islamic tradition on the one side and daily increase in their scientific and practical use in medicine on the other, the way these narrations are interpreted and implied is a crucial issue to discuss. Interpreting and understanding these medical narrations requires some standards independent from those used in the domain of jurisprudence. Among the important medical books derived from these narrations is “Derasah fi Tib al-Rasoul al-Mustafa” the author of which has used the Ijtihad Method to train medical students and treat patients. Thus, considering the real effect of this ijtihad method on patients’ lives, the purpose of this study is to investigate the validity of this method in the field of medical narrations.

The current research was conducted utilizing a descriptive-analytic method and relied upon the aforesaid book and books from the field of jurisprudence and the principles of jurisprudence to evaluate and criticize the method employed in the book discussed. The authors reported no conflict of interests.

It was found that the criticisms targeted at the methodology of Ijtihad from medical narrations used by the book involve, 1) neglecting the general standards of understanding and interpreting the narrations which entail; heavy dependence on the texts without considering the associated evidences, neglecting rebuilding broken up narrations, deficient lexical and topical investigation, speculative generalizations and specializations, extending the meaning of narrations to material issues, 2) neglecting the exclusive standards for interpretation of medical narrations including; neglecting the distinction among a real (fulfilled) case, a potential (assumed) case and particular (conditional) case.

Studying the examples from method and style of the book in interpreting medical narrations with regard to recognition and treatment of illnesses showed that the inferences made by the book are not reliable due to their inattention to primary standards and general knowledge of narrations’ jurisprudence. Thus, without ensuring the validity and accuracy of the authors’ interpretations, the method is not reliable because it exerts real effects on human lives.

Referring to hadiths in understanding religious is a familiar practice in religious thought from the very beginning of Islam. Muslim scholars referred to hadiths to understand the depth of religion. Therefore, when it comes to benefiting from hadiths in a specific field of knowledge such as medicine, using them in a meaningful way is of particular importance and necessity of an expert look at the issue is raised. Nowadays, due to the general popularity and extreme approaches to traditional and Islamic medicine, we are witnessing the occurrence of unfortunate consequences in the field of public health. Which can create doubt in all religious propositions; Although the approach of scholars is faced whit different medical traditions, but the majority of Muslim scholars consider it necessary to present the narration on the rules of criticizing and refining the hadith. And considering the many changes and complexities that exist in this type of narratives, it is necessary to review them by experts. In this article, by examining the point of view of hadith scholars, the documentary and textual bases of the validity of medical traditions have been examined and in the documentary validity of medical narrations, Islamic scholars agree on the acceptance of frequent medical narrations that are subject to evidence of authenticity in the authenticity of medical narrations that are not subject to evidence that are narrated by reliable sources like other narrations, they are divided into two categories and they disagree. Considering the experimental nature of the subject of medicine the criterion of non-contradiction with experience and scientific findings is particularly important among the general criteria of text criticism. we also mentioned some of the criteria in the external review the criteria that can be helpful in solving the complexities of this category of narrations, such as measuring the authenticity of narrations and books and examining the health of the narration in terms of distortion and correction, intersection and quoting in meaning.

The medical science has series of problem statements, answering to which must be discovered. The common medicine, with all the statements about it, has a methodology and basis for answering its questions and proceeds according to it. In the case of Islamic medicine, we do not encounter conventional methodology and foundations as an alternative to conventional medicine. Today, although referring to hadiths and narratives to achieve new medicine is a new phenomenon, but the referring to narrative is not a new phenomenon. Over the centuries, many hadith schools have considered the citation in hadith, including Akhbâriun and Usuliun schools, each of which with a new concept to present. The aim of the present research was to express the scope of the "content" and "citation" analysis in the field of Islamic medical hadith.

The approach to confronting medical narratives should be accompanied by a scientific encounter; in how to collect narrative, in content analysis, and in the testing and conclusion stages. Too much and too little that are typically seen in the face of medical narratives are both harmful. It is both harmful that all of these narratives are seen as a definite tradition or that they are all considered with lack of confidence and without any expert review.