Cycle of Trust in International Relations: Iran and the US

Regarding the role of trust as a semantic issue in international compromises and presentations, this article examines the concept of trust and its various dimensions. In this article, we examine different aspects of the concept of trust and consider it as a cycle of creation, continuity, failure and Or reproduce itself, using the statements of constructed schools to address the relationship between the two countries, Iran and the United States, and their position within this cycle. Research shows that countries that enter the trust cycle due to changing conditions and various factors within the cycle, trust between them may be impaired, sometimes improved, reproduced, or if the primary trust fails to reproduce and return to full confidence. Face. The main focus of the discussion, given the 40-year-old unchanged structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran, relates to the influence of the agency and the semantic and psychological propositions between them. Given that the historical findings of this article confirm the emergence and subsequent decline of trust between the two countries since the establishment of initial communications to date and the theoretical outlook of this paper's findings on the impact of the two countries' decision-makers throughout their history. They have entered the trust cycle, but in the end, they have become distrustful of their relationship by entering the feedback loop. The research method in this paper is empirical-analytical and the method of data collection is library.