Application of the rule of Necessity and Urgency in treatment of the patient by a Stranger Physician

The jurisprudential rule of "necessity and urgency" can be current and documented in many cases. Applying this rule can play an important role in stranger physicians’ look and touch and it can be as a way for them to treat patients in accordance with jurisprudential issues.

This descriptive-analytical article analyzes jurisprudential texts and critiques and examines the views of jurists on the rule of necessity in treatment and its requirements by a stranger physician.

The use of necessity is considered as a jurisprudential solution to allow some treatments. The present study shows that the jurists, citing this rule, seek to provide a jurisprudential solution for the treatment of stranger patients by physicians, although there is a difference between them in the type of citation of the rule due to differences in documentary narrations.