Sociological Comparative Analysis of the Priority and Delay of Female Capital in Tibetan Dream Novels (Fariba Vafi) and The Forbidden Booklet (Alba Despodes) (Based on Pierre Bourdieu's theory of capital)

 Sociological analysis of capital types can be seen in the views of theorists such as Bourdieu. In Bourdieu"s definition, in addition to economic capital, other types of capital are also very important, which are: cultural, social, symbolic and economic capital. This article looks at the effects of female precedence and latency on each other in the analysis of female capital by looking at the capitals of female characters in novels The Tibetan Dream and The Forbidden Book.

 This research was conducted by descriptive-analytical method.

 This article shows how societal activism of women"s assets emerges in sociological comparison and relying on the capital element of these two works. The result of the study, comparing the narrator"s capitals of the two novels, reveals the precedence of the Tibetan dream women"s cultural capitals over the Forbidden Book of Novels, which is a late economic capital (in the shadow and support of men, as rights or inheritance) and symbolic (ie love and respect for Mother figure) in a small way for them.

 In the field of social capital, women in the two novels have only the first social capital (marital and maternal relations) which does not have a positive reproduction and the main character of the Tibetan dream novel loses this small capital and instead loses the symbolic capital of love. Earns. Since in the novel Vafi the two characters Shiva and Sholeh have relatively high cultural and social capital, they reproduce more social and symbolic capital in the study of the precedence of capitals in comparison with the novel Despespeds; While in the novel Despodes, in having different types of capitals, their early capital (cultural and social capital) is small, which does not lead to positive reproduction.