Feasibility study of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court to investigate the crime of terrorism

Today, the spread of terrorism and how it is carried out is done with the direct support of individuals and legal entities (such as governments) before, during and after military conflicts and directly and indirectly, and even using advanced technologies such as robots, drones or cyberspace. . This diversity and breadth of terror has led to a lack of jurisdiction at the international level; Because in compound crimes (crimes that begin and end in several countries) and extraterritorial; National courts will have jurisdiction in the event of access to or extradition of offenders, and the Statute of the International Criminal Court, as an international judicial authority, is not competent to commit terrorism (under Article 5 of the Statute), but this is international custom. The Statute of the International Courts of Rwanda (Article 2 of the ICTR Statute refers to premeditated murder and 4) and Yugoslavia (Article 2 of the ICTY Statute refers to premeditated murder and Article 5 refers to premeditated murder) and the Court of Appeal The Lebanese International (to investigate the assassination of Saad Hariri) was also formed for this purpose to reduce this power vacuum. But it seems that international norms and existing rules (including the customary draft of the international responsibility of governments in 2001) and the criminalizations in the ICC Statute, including crimes against humanity and war crimes, can be tried. The perpetrators of the assassination paid.