Analytical Review of the Criticism of New Historicism

History and literature have been in a dialectical relationship for a long time, and the study of literary and critical works shows simultaneous developments in these two phenomena. Which one is the cause of change in the other is not very important in this discussion, but what is very important for us is the dual relationship that has always existed between them. History and literature, which are presented in a more detailed form in the history of literature, function in shaping each other or providing a report of each other, and this is important in the past in a traditional way and in the contemporary period in a new way, and in this The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the relationship between history and literature and an introduction to traditional historical criticism, and discuss the category of modern historicism in criticism or neo-historical criticism.The result of the discussion shows that in the new reading of historicist criticism, literature and literary text in providing historical report is not only dependent on history and historical texts, but it can also use multi-voice and multi-dimensional structure and artistic techniques. To provide the audience with a clear picture of the current and past events, something that history generally considers its right to do.