This study aims at investigating verbs in Kordeei dialect. The verbs have conjugated in present, past and future time which was at least different from Larestani in phonetic forms. The data collected by interviewing with old people, studying relevant books and papers and author's intuition. The infinitives and auxiliary verbs are investigated. The data conjugated in present, past and future time. It is concluded that there are special subjective and objective morphemes in conjugating with past time in different situations. The auxiliaries, also, have different phonetic changes when it is conjugated with main verbs.

Human beings heritage of Intellectual, literary, cultural and scientific are illustrated in language; so, many researchers have been involved in the study of language. Papoon is one of the villages of Kohmaereh Nowdaan in Kazeroon city. The inhabitants speak in Papooni accent. In this article, conjugational structure of verb has been investigated. One of the writers of this research is a native Papooni speaker and in order to gather data, he interviewed with some of illiterate speakers of this accent. The results showed that verb in Papooni accent like other middle Iranian languages are constructed based on present and past tenses. The other point is that transitive and intransitive conjugations of verbs are different. Conjugations of transitive verbs like middle Persian identifiers come at the beginning of the verb and intransitive in past tense are also different regarding this accent which can be categorized as the so-called ergative family. Also, the results showed that identifiers of past and present verb are not the same. In Papooni accent past participle like modern and Old Persian is constructed (past root + fatheh). For expressing concepts related to the future, the verb will be used in general conjugation of verb in Papooni accent radically different from standard Persian and some forms of verb are constructed in different ways.

The dialect of Ardakan in Fars is one of the western-south dialects of Iran spoken in some of parts of Sepidan and especially in its center, Ardakan, in Fars province. This study examines the verb system of this dialect precisely by analyzing the data gathered through questionnaires and interviews with informants who are above 35 years old. In this research, topics such as infinitives, verb stems, verb endings, different tenses, moods, causative verbs, and passive voice are analyzed. In order to show how this dialect keeps the ergative structure, transitive and intransitive verbs in simple past, present perfect, past imperfective, past continuous, past perfect, and past subjunctive tenses and the use of them in sentences are compared. Then, different moods in this dialect such as indicative, subjunctive, and imperative moods are studied. At the end, it is analyzed the way causative verbs and passive voice are made.

In this study, it is tried to analyze Behbahani as a local Dialect to specify to which category, the dialect or the accent, belongs. Using related literature and findings, verb conjugation has been reviewed for different tenses in Behbahani to conduct the study. The results of the study revealed that, in spite of the similarities between standard Persian and Behbahani dialects in their sentence structure levels and patterns, Behbahani is unique and completely different from standard Persian in the verb conjugation level. Finally, it is concluded that Behbahni, linguistically, is categorized in dialects of Persian.

Southern Kurdish dialects or (kermanshahi-Ilami) dialects are one of the four main Kurdish dialects (Kermanji, Soranji, Orami-Ghoran, and Southern Kurdish dialect) divided to too many sub-dialects. In this study, we have analyzed the features of grammatical points and etymological reference of grammar of these dialects with the emphasis on differences. Thus, firstly, we have identified Kurdish language and its dialects, then, we have described etymological grammar of these dialects.
This study has been conducted by library study method and descriptive-analytical approach. According to the findings, these three dialects have very close associations with each other and in some grammatical points they meet the similarities. But among them, there are some differences mostly appeared in verb etymology, usage of pronouns, adverbs usage, prepositions, and prefixes. These differences often occurred in changes of some letters. These differences caused these dialects varieties and also the independency and appearance of particular grammatical system of them.

This study aims to investigate verbs inflection in Ghaen dialect, and doing the same, examines the existence of ergative-absulatlive case marking system in this dialect. The ergative structure is one of the features that has survived in some Iranian dialects (such as Kermanji, Taleshi, Tati, Baluchi, etc.) while in others (such as Contemporary Farsi, Central and Southern Kurds, Lori, Mazandaran, Gilaki, etc.), they have lost their role and replaced it with other types of case-marking systems, including nominative-accusative. The research data collection was conducted in the field and in the library method in the city of Ghaen which is located in the southern Khorasan between 33 to 34 degrees north latitude and 38 to 60 degrees east longitude. The data analysis showed that this dialect as one of the Iranian north – eastern ones preserved a feature of semi-ergativity from middle era up to now.

Kurdish is the language of millions of people on earth. Kermanji, Sorani (Southern Kermanji), Orami-Gorani and Southern Kurdish are the main dialects of Kurdish with several sub-dialects and accents. Southern Kurdish is the dialect of Kermanshah and Ilam regions. In Kermanshah, there exist dialects such as Kalhori, Jafi, Orami, and etc. Ilami Kurdish (Fili Kurdish), is the common language of the inhabitants of Ilam province and parts of Iraq such as Mendali and Khaneqin. Kalhori, Khazli, Arkavazi, Malekshahi, etc. form the dialects of the inhabitants of Ilam province. In the present study, with the aim of discovering and identifying some of the grammatical rules of Ilami dialects, Kalhori dialect (Ivan city and parts of Shirvan and Chardavol) and Fili dialect were compared in terms of verb forms. The results showed that there are many similarities in the grammatical rules of these dialects due to kinship, and at the same time, there are some differences in suffixes when the verbs are conjugated in the second and third person singular forms.

Neishabori dialect is considered as one of the oldest eastern dialects of Iran, which has special coordinates in terms of phonetic and grammatical features. In this essay, in the descriptive-analytical way and the method of document analysis and data mining, based on library studies and using the author's pseudo-language, as an Neishaborian informant, main phonetic processes are investigated, types of phonemes of this dialect are described and explained, and we have categorized and divided each phoneme by using its distinctive feature. In the following, the subject of suffixes and prefixes,  has been examined as well as the conjugation of verbs and their tenses. The research results show that the phonemes of Nishaburi dialect include 33 phonemes; Hamzeh is hardly heard at the beginning of words in Nishaburi dialect, some phonemes such as "A" and "H" are pronounced clearly and thickly in Arabic words. Both phonemes "gh" and "q" are present in the language at the same time. Unlike standard Persian, some syllables start with a consonant without a vowel. In the Nishaburi dialect, there are changes in vowels, some of which are completely irregular and others are regular. Elision, metathesis, fusion, displacement, difference in pronunciation of some verbs such as past continuous and past participle, special usages of affixes are some of the features that causes the difference between Nishabori dialect and standard Persian. Also, according to this dialect, some lexical etymologies can be completed and revised.