The identification of the Quranic narrations with the inconsistent procedures of descriptive and recommended propositions from the previous texts was expressed by the ill-wishers for and disbelievers in the holy Quran throughout the history of Islam. This postulation was processed in various ways to demonstrate the teachings and propositions of the holy Quran are devoid of identity while the disbelievers were short of ideological models. The nature of the response of the believers in the Quran during the history was ideological, and in regard to method, it was aligned with their methodological claim. The rise of empirical knowledge, the emergence of new empirical theories and its projection into philosophical and religious views placed the claim of taking the text of religion from the previous texts in the idea of ​​intertextuality. The new approach considered all the teachings of the holy Quran, especially the story of the Great Flood, in a structural and cognitive range taken from the previous texts. Using the hermeneutic method, this study examined and criticized the Quranic narration of Noah's Flood at the text level, with the author-based hermeneutic elements and in relation to the mythological texts of Mesopotamia and the old Testament and the New Testament, and processed the idea of ​​its independence using textual discourse elements.

The Holy Quran is one of the main criteria for evaluating narrative texts, especially interpretive narrations. In this axis, researchers have emphasized more on the necessity of presenting the Holy Quran, but less has been discussed how to present the Holy Quran, and in this regard, a comprehensive model has not been presented, especially in the presentation of explanatory narrations on the Holy Quran. In this research, a comprehensive model is presented for the evaluation of interpretive narratives with the Quran using the descriptive-analytical method. The suggested model in this research are: 1. Obtaining the contents; 2. Avoiding prejudice; 3. Clarifying the vocabulary of the verse; 4. Examining the context of adjacent verses; 5. Paragraphing the verse to specify the clear and comprehensive points; 6. Explanation of the verse with the help of other verses; 7. Categorizing narrations and obtaining contents; 8. Deducing the ratio of hadiths with verses; 9. Presentation of hadiths to the Quran.

The Holy Quran is the supreme book of guidance and the most important revelatory source unanimously acknowledged by all Muslims. The necessity of recognizing the Imam and the successor of the great Prophet of Islam (p.b.u.h.) and the indication of some narrations as to the existence of the name of Imam Ali and the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.) in the holy Quran is one of the challenges that made Muhaddith Nouri, in responding to the opponents of Imam Ali's (a.s.) immediate caliphate, be inclined towards the distorted idea that the Quran is imperfect, relying on some narrations. Hence, the present study aims to examine the aforementioned narrations and analytically criticize the arguments of those opponents and Muhaddith Nouri’s idea. In doing so, using the descriptive-analytical method, first several answers are given to reject the claim in question; then the style of the holy Quran in expressing its content and the method of making inferences from it are explained, and Abu Basir’s sound hadith from Imam Sadeq (a.s.), according to which the reason for not mentioning the name of Imam Ali (a.s.) in the Quran is the style of the Quran in stating divine knowledge, is explicated. The findings of this study indicate three characteristics, i.e. the general statement, the internal expansion and external expansion of the holy Quran, which elucidate why the names of Imam Ali and other Imams (a.s.) have not been mentioned in the holy Quran. Moreover, ignoring the documentary inspection of the narrations, it has been illuminated that mentioning the name of Imam Ali (a.s.) in the interpretive additions of some of the companions’ copies of the Quran or in sound narrations is indicative of “explanatory interpretation” or the expression of purpose, the occasion of revelation and examples of the Quranic  verses,  not the existence of his name in the text of the Quran.

This research is entitled (Aesthetics of slowness in the narration of the Holy Quran) and with the aim of showing the aesthetics of the slowness technique in narration in the Holy Quran by considering Surah Yusuf as a practical Sample. This research intends to unveil the aesthetic techniques in the Holy Quran, namely the techniques of dialogue and pause and their use in an artistic and semantic way and to examine the extent of its impact on narration and its semantic aims, which is beyond narration. And since it uses the Holy Quran as a material for the application of narrative and critical concepts and theories, it undoubtedly leads to an in-depth and important research that is not possible in any other text. Also, any study related to the Holy Quran will be an eternal research which survives on the wise sayings that God – the merciful - has preserved over the ages. This research conducted on descriptive and analytical method to observe and follow the artistic phenomena in Surah Yusuf, which slowness the narration in this surah; and This has been done with the aim of examining the slowness technique, discussing the structure of the narrative, and analyzing these two techniques to achieve objective results. It was determined that the art of dialogue is very widespread in Surah Yusuf; Even the conversational verses reach seventy-one verses from the total of ninety-eight verses, which is the number of verses in the surah. Finally, by examining the narration techniques, it becomes clear that these techniques, including slowness technique, cause a semantic balance in the surah.

Among the various criteria that have been taken into consideration by the scholars of fundamental science to refine the hadiths, the most reliable way is to present the hadiths based on the Holy Quran. Because, the Qur'an is the word of God and the source of all righteousness. And on the other hand, the content of the narrations is the necessity of comparing the narrations with the Quran. Since the meanings of presenting narrations are different and sometimes multi-faceted, the present research seeks to investigate the question of how the meaning of presenting narrations can be interpreted from the perspective of Mohaqeq Naini, and what is the difference between it and other perspectives? The problem of the present research with the descriptive-analytical method and the collection of information in the form of a library, such as priority of Quran, the semantics of the presenting narrations and allocation or non-allocation to the conflict, has been investigated, the method and "the perspective of believing that peresentation narrations is an external and reality case" From Naini's point of view, is preferred. This point of view answers the major problems in the science of the principles regarding the contents of the narrations and the contradictions of the hadiths and the Holy Qur'an.