حسین عارفی نیا

How to respond to doubts about the resurrection and firm belief in the resurrection is one of the important topics between Islamic sects and schools. This research, by collecting information in an analytical-comparative way, is an answer to the question of eating and being eaten and reincarnation, how will a person return to the afterlife after being eaten by humans or other creatures? And after being separated from the human body, does the soul and soul transfer to the body or other beings or not? The purpose of the article is to compare and compare the views of the thinkers of the Imamiyya and Matridiyya sects. Based on the findings of this research, the arguments of those who refuse the return of nothingness from the "theologians of Mushreb-e-Imamiyyah philosophers and some Matridiyyah theologians" based on "the decline of the elements of the material world and the survival of the soul and spirit" have been repellent to the suspicion of being devoured and eaten and reincarnation. Contrary to the promise of those who believe in the survival of the main parts of man and the promise of the survival of the main and secondary parts, it does not dispel these two doubts. the arguments of those who believe that the return of nothingness is permissible from "Matridiyyah theologians and some of the Imamiyyah" regarding the annihilation of all the creations of the world, the doubt of eating and being eaten and reincarnation, is against the elimination of the issue, Contrary to the words of the sayings to collect the scattered parts (the word of detail), which did not repel the suspicion of eating and being eaten or reincarnation.

The intellectual life of Shaygan is divided into three periods: early, middle, and late. His book, "Asia against the West", was written in the early period of his life with the aim of protecting the Iranian, Asian culture and identity vis-à-vis the West. The main objective of this research is to find out Shaygan’s approach to the idea of ​​national identity and oriental culture in this book. He tried to make a distinction between the Western philosophy and Asian civilization and save Eastern mysticism, which is based on piety and inner purity, from the harms of modernism. His approach to the issue of identity had a nationalist orientation and his criterion in encountering Western cultural invasions was focusing on the Iranian traditional and ethnic concepts. He directed the identity of the current Muslim community to the Iranian-Eastern culture instead of leading and guiding it towards the Quranic Islamic identity. On the other hand, due to his special attachment to Asian mysticisms, he has ignored the essential conflict between Islam and Eastern schools. This research is an attempt to critically examine the main early ideas of Shaygan in the mentioned book. The necessary data was collected from library resources and analyzed through descriptive-analytical method.Keywords: Islam, identity, eastern schools, modernism, Shaygan

The Holy Prophet (PBUH) considers the purpose of his revelation to be the completion of moral virtues. This monopoly has caused doubt and brought sometimes to mind of conflict with the other goals of the Prophet (PBUH). Some, using the meaning of the hadith, have considered the only duty of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as moral virtue and spirituality, and have thus concluded the separation of morality from politic. Others have highlighted the policy and power of the Prophet (PBUH) in order to weaken the hadith of Makarem al-Akhlaq.

This research, with a descriptive-analytical method, tries to eliminate the semantic doubts of the Makarem al-Akhlaq hadith.

In addition to answering the mentioned doubts, this study seeks to prove the correctness of the real and additional monopoly as an adjective on noun and secondly, the non-contradiction of the hadith monopoly with other goals of the Prophet (PBUH) including politics and government. Therefore, the monopoly in the hadith has not been as a noun on adjective, in order to conclude the separation of morality from politics.