فهرست مطالب mohammad mohadesi

In the fourth and fifth centuries of Hijri, Muslims faced new challenges and doubts based on the diversity of the ideological composition of Egyptian and Levant inhabitants and the religious tolerance of the Fatimids. The special attention of Muslim scholars was instrumental in maintaining the coherence and consolidation of Muslim beliefs related to Islam in these areas. The covert and overt attention can be understood from this point of view in Abu al-Fath Karajaki’s writings to defend the righteousness of Islam (449 AD). Therefore, the central question of the current research has arisen when considering the method of the theologians of that period, which was to use history along with hadith and rational reasoning to prove their beliefs, and Karajaki's way of using historical reports to defend Islam. This study was conducted using the meaning analysis approach and the concept of ‘Schemata’. It shows that Karajaki's method was to link famous historical events in defending the authenticity of Islam with the miraculous aspects of God’s book (news of the future) and the Prophet’s life (PBUH). It makes the possibility of miracles more acceptable. As Christians created the negation of the schemata in the region, it led to the creation of the ideas ‘we are like them’ (by emphasizing the commonality of the prophets' miracles) and ‘we are better than them’ (miracles and prophecies connected with history). In this way, the approval of the authenticity of the Prophet (PBUH) and the Qur'an are in line with the approval of these miracles or schemata. Finally, it has also led to the establishment of the legitimacy of Islam.

Awareness of the communication network of Imami scholars and the way they communicate with the thriving center of each period is effective in recognizing us from lesser-known scholars in different regions who have been effective in expanding and consolidating Imami Shiism in all parts of the Islamic world.It is important to pay attention to it in various aspects such as teacher-student relations,the effectiveness of thoughts, as well as the type and content of the works produced.Therefore,in the present study,focusing on Karajaki(d. 449) as one of the Levant scholars, his master-student relationship with heads of the Baghdad school has been considered and then the effect of this on Karajakichr (chr(chr(chr(chr ('39')39chr('39'))39chr(chr('39') 39chr('39')))39chr(chr (chr('39')39chr('39')) 39chr (chr('39')39 chr('39'))))39chr(chr(chr(chr ('39')39chr('39')) 39chr(chr ('39')39chr('39')))39chr(chr (chr('39')39chr('39')) 39chr(chr('39')39chr ('39')))))s scientific performance in Levant has been studied.The result of this descriptive-analytical study indicates that Tusi was not a Karajaki master, just as there was no master-student relationship between Karajaki and Seyyed Morteza, despite her intellectual affinity.Thus, among the leaders of the Baghdad school,Sheikh Mufid was the only Karajaki master.A connection that has influenced his jurisprudential,theological and political views.The choice of subjects overshadowed his writings,influenced the selection and narration of historical narratives in the works of this thinker,and played a significant role in the development of the school of theologians in the Levant.