جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Ghadir » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

The explanation of Ghadir as the most important symbol of Shia is very important from the viewpoint of Andalusian scholars as the westernmost part of Islamic lands. The current article aims to answer the question "what point of view they had towards Ghadir and explain the reasons for the difference in this point of view". The findings of this study, via a descriptive analytical method based on historical data, suggest that Andalusian scholars had a different view of Ghadir under the influence of political and cultural currents, especially the religious situation. One group has ignored it without paying attention to and some other groups without referring to the main event, have explained some of the stories and speeches mentioned there such as the famous hadith of the Prophet " Whoever I am the Mawla of, Ali is his Mawla", but they haven't paid attention to its content and origin. Some have given it in detail and looked at it with faith.

The examination and study ofIbnAbi al-Hadid's view about Ghadir and clear text on the succession of Imam Ali in his most significant work, the description of Nahj al-Balaghah is the "main issue" of this paper, which has been carried out in a descriptive and analytical method.The hypothesis of this study is that even though IbnAbi al-Hadid does not consider the Ghadir event as a clear text for the caliphate of Ali, he emphasizes its importance and mentions important examples of the celebration of Ghadir in his work, emphasizing the type of belief of the Imamiyah in those celebrations.Based on the findings of this study, IbnAbi al-HadidMu'tazili accepts the event of Ghadir and the praise of the Messenger of God (Prophet Mohammad) from Ali and even mentions the views of the Imamiyahscholars in the context of the text on the caliphate of ImamAli with his tolerance.He also mentions the prayers of the Prophet for Ali in Ghadir.In his work, he has also rejected the celebrations of Shias on the anniversary of GhadirKhum and its philosophy, a topic that was less discussed in non-Imamyah works before the Mongol invasion.He does not accept or interpret the narratives that are consideredclear text on the Imamate of Imam Ali.

Poetry as one of the most fundamental ways of conveying meaning and connection with others is based on the two pillars of thought and imagination in the linguistic figures of speech. The thought that sits on the wing of imagination is easier to be engraved in the heart and mind of the audience. Ghadir event has been the subject of some poems since the very first years after its occurrence. The poets of Ghadir, as the narrators of this prophetic hadith, have played an undeniable role in keeping it alive, lasting, impressing the audience and explaining the various dimensions of Ghadir. After a brief explanation of the concept of poetry and its place in Islamic culture, this paper has tried to focus on the ode of Joljolieh composed by Amr ibn al-'As ibn Wa'il (43 AH) in the first century AH and by analyzing the implications of this poem, the study also seeks to show the contribution of Ghadir's poetry in the historical description and explanation of the dimensions of Ghadir's event and turning it into an identity sign for the followers of the Ahl al- Bayt school or giving them an identity.

Nowruz is the first month of the solar year which was held in the form of a glorious celebration in pre-Islamic Iran; After Islam, during the Bani Umayyad period, and especially during Bani Abbas, Nowruz was revived until it reached its former glory in the Safavid period, (as the period of restoring the national unity of Iran after Islam). The purpose of this study is to explain what and why the connection between the ancient celebration of Nowruz and Shiite teachings, especially the celebration of Ghadir in the Safavid period; The present study tries to answer two questions in this regard by descriptive-analytical method- What is the evidence of the connection between Nowruz and Ghadir in the Safavid era? 2- Why was Nowruz compared to Shiite teachings in this period? Evidences of the connection between Nowruz and Ghadir in the Safavid period can be traced to some hadith sources, travelogues and Nowruz-letters that were written at that time. This comparison was an attempt by the Safavid government to spread Shiism among the Iranians, to oppose the Ottoman Sunni state, to use the gifts of Nowruz, and to strengthen Nowruz

Since centuries ago, the subject of prophet’s succession has been discussed by Muslims and, in the meantime, Shi`ism has proposed strong and accurate religious text-based reasons in favor of Ali’s succession. To oppose this belief and the validity of Ghadir, the opponents of Shi’ism say: “if it is so that thousands of the companions were present in Gadir and heard the prophet`s speech of Ali`s succession after the death of the prophet, why did not one out of thousands come to protest against usurpation of Ali’s right”. Referring to the historical and, to some extent, the sources of Hadith as well as managing, political, military, cultural, and economic aspects, the paper analyzes the reasons of the success of the founders of Saqeyfah for occupying the prophet’s succession.

In his last trip to Mecca and his participation in one of the most important Muslims’ communities (Haj), prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was to complement his mission by appointing his successor for the sake of the religion perfection as well as the completion of God’s blessings. But soon, because of the tumult in Saqifa, the prophet’s testament was forgotten and the course of events marked an unhappy ending for the Ghadir. Destined events of this period, from the gathering in Ghadir to a meeting in Saqifah, have dramatically affected the early history of Islam. So, it is of crucial importance to scrutinize the matter and develop a subtle analysis of the events in the last three months of the prophet’s lifespan in order to have a better understanding of the political and religious movements in process at that time. This article aims at looking at the matter by drawing on important sources, namely the narratives contained in two historians’ books: Yaqobi’s and Tabari’s. It is also intended to analyze the developments and changes arising from the events from Ghadir to Saqifah. Finally, intending to analyze the issue in terms of succession, this study takes the approach and tries to prove that it was the Qoraish overambitious leaders’ plot at Saqifah council, as well as time limitation, that led to the unfruitful realization of the prophet recommendations in relation to the appointment of a praiseworthy successor.