جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "resistance front" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The purpose of the current research is to provide a systematic model of the goals of the Hamas movement in "Toofan Al-Aqsa Operation".  The current research is applied in terms of purpose, exploratory in terms of data collection method, and qualitative and quantitative (mixed) in terms of data nature. The method of data collection and analysis was used in the qualitative part, interview type, and theme analysis method was used for analysis, and in the quantitative part, it was a questionnaire and structural equation modeling with the partial least squares (PLS) approach. System input indicators include the escalation of Zionist war crimes and the reaction to the Abraham Agreement; The process indicators of the system include limited tactical action, the vulnerability of the defense positions of the Zionist regime, efforts to de-escalate the tension among the countries of the Islamic world, the internal challenges of the Zionist regime, and finally the output indicators of the system include increasing the deterrence power of Hamas, redesigning the paradigm of resistance, negating any compromise and helplessness. Zionists are in the process of making peace. It seems that the "Toofan Al-Aqsa Operation" is a new chapter in the change of the resistance paradigm, based on which, the discourse of confrontation and the struggles of the Hamas movement has changed from deterrence to offensive.

The aim of the current research is to design a model of security deterrence in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the “Operation True Promise”. The current research is applied In terms of objectives, exploratory in terms of data collection method, and mixed in terms of the nature of data. The method of data collection and analysis in the qualitative part is the interview type, and the analysis method is the thematic method, and in the quantitative part, the questionnaire and structural equation modeling with the partial least squares approach. The statistical community includes experts and experts in the fields of political science, international relations, geopolitics and a number of military elites. In the qualitative part, using the snowball sampling method, the opinions of 16 experts (10 university professors and 6 military) were used, and in the quantitative part, based on the available sampling method and Cochran's formula, 225 related experts were used. The results showed that the system model of Iran's security deterrence has four main dimensions of input indicators, processes, output and consequences of the system. Input indicators (the attack of the Zionist regime on the Iranian consulate and the war in Gaza) with legal and military-political dimensions; the processes (carrying out the Operation True Promise) include Iran's minimal response and the Zionist regime's maximum defense, the difficulty of normalizing relations with the Zionist regime and increasing the gap between the Zionist regime and America; the output indicators of the system (increasing Iran's deterrence) include the redesign of the deterrence system in the region by the Axis of Resistance, the redesign of the regional governance model of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the soft power dimension, the economic dimension, and the change in Iran's nuclear doctrine, and finally, the outcome or outcome includes efforts to stabilize the security system. It is the Middle East region.

The role of social capacities in the formation and strengthening of the discourse of resistance and the security complex of the resistance has a prominent role, which is influenced by the Islamic revolution of Iran and the values and norms resulting from it. Many of the indicators of the political culture ruling the Islamic Revolution and the Islamic Republic of Iran have had an identity-oriented, justice-seeking and foundation-breaking nature. This has played an effective role in the formation of Islamic resistance movements, including Islamic movements in Lebanon and Palestine, and this international deconstruction, the international authority and security desired by the West and conservative Arab countries in the security complex, West Asia is facing a threat. In this regard, the aim of the research is to identify the common ground between Iran and the resistance axis countries (case study of Iraq, Yemen, and Palestine). Therefore, the question of the present article seeks to answer the question, "What is the most important national commonality of Iran with the countries of Iraq, Yemen, and Palestine?" Or what effect does the social capacities of these countries have on the resistance front?” This research is based on analytical-comparative method and data collection method based on library sources. The research findings are that, it seems that Iran's national commonality with the countries of Iraq, Yemen and Palestine is the presence of components such as common religion, language, and culture. In fact, as Iran mostly has a common religion, culture, and language, the aforementioned elements also apply to the mentioned countries.

This study uses the hybrid method to design a Toofan Al Aqsa operation model as a new paradigm of resistance for Islamic countries. The current research is developmental in terms of its purpose; In terms of approach, it is done qualitatively and based on meta-synthesis. Based on this, the statistical population of the research includes a collection of articles that have been published from 2020 to 2023 on the subject of Zionism, the Islamic world, Palestine, and the resistance front. The authors selected 71 articles out of 376 by searching among domestic and foreign scientific databases, and after analyzing their content, categories, and concepts were extracted and their prioritization was done using Shannon's entropy method. Based on the findings 49 concepts were identified in the form of 8 categories and were separated in the form of two categories of external front and internal front factors. Reconstruction of the strategic relations of Islamic countries (strategic de-escalation), decline of the normalization project with the Zionist regime, limited tactical action, geopolitical fragility, weak strategic depth, internal crises of the Zionist regime, reverse migration, and manpower crisis had the highest coefficient of importance, respectively. It seems that with the application of such components, a pragmatic model can be achieved in the struggle and resistance against the Zionist regime in other Islamic countries.

This research aims to analyze the paradigm shift of Hamas movement in the operation of October 7, 2023. The research method is applied-developmental in terms of purpose, and mixed-exploratory in terms of nature. In the qualitative part, to identify the effective factors from the content analysis method, literature review, and exploratory interviews with academic experts in political science, geopolitics, international relations, regional studies, and 38 military experts have been used.The non-random method with the snowball technique was used to select experts until reaching theoretical saturation. The statistical population in the quantitative part was 60 experts, and researchers, estimated by simple random sampling.  The Delphi-phase method was used for screening and selection of factors, which selected 15 factors out of 17 identified factors, and using exploratory factor analysis, the factors were determined in the form of three main factors of the transition from defensive measures to offensive, reaction to the Abraham Agreement and finally shifting the paradigm of Resistance were categorized.  Also, the structural-interpretive modeling method has been used for layering in the first level, the transition from defensive to offensive measures; in the second level, reaction to the Abraham Agreement and in the third level, shifting the paradigm of Resistance. According to the graph of the power of influence and degree of dependence, all three factors were placed in the autonomous region, which has low power of influence and degree of dependence, and they will have little influence and permeability to each other.

Diplomacy is one of the important fields of best, optimal and maximum provision of national, regional and international interests. The Islamic Republic of Iran, which is one of the most effective and powerful players in the West Asian region, as the only country that has had the most dialogue, ideological and strategic confrontation with the United States in the region and the world during the last 40 years, looks at diplomacy and foreign policy as an area to advance its principles, ideals, values and components of its revolutionary and Islamic universalism, the realization of which requires the use of necessary and efficient tools, which the country's diplomacy and foreign policy institution is at the head of it. But besides the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as the main custodian of the country's foreign policy, there are also various organizations that help the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in this matter. The Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is one of these important institutions that, under the command of martyr Haj Qassem Soleimani, have achieved valuable successes and achievements in the field of promoting authority and national security, as well as facing security, political, economic, military, and other threats. And along with that, he achieved the transformation of the Islamic Republic into a powerful and effective actor in regional and global equations. The jihadist and unique management of the commander of the Quds Force, Martyr Soleimani, and in other words, his "jihadi diplomacy" along with his military, security and political activities, has been the most important element in realizing the aforementioned strategic achievements and desirable and positive effects for Iran. Due to the importance of this issue, Jihadi diplomacy has been explored and investigated with an emphasis on the performance of martyr Haj Qasim Soleimani.

The Resistance Front (Axis of resistance) is a rather new actor in international system. During the past two decades there have been numerous books and scholarly articles written about it reflecting a wide range of views and analyses about its goals and impacts on the West Asia, and also its members in general. This article is an attempt to investigate particularly the role of Islamic Republic of Iran in establishing and developing the Resistance Front focusing specially on the Iranian Foreign Policy in regional and global context as far as the Resistance Front is concerned. The paper is based on this assumption that the Resistance Front has arrived at an a new era after passing through almost two decades of critical challenges. The events in post-occupation Iraq, during the Saudi-led coalition war against Yemen, and also the events related to the fight against Deash and other terrorist groups in Syria together with the new role played by LebaneseHezbollah, and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Palestine in confrontation with Israeli occupation and aggressive policies are all signs of a new era in the life of Resistance Front. of paper argues that in this new era and according to new developments Iranian foreign policy faces some a number of tasks. In this context guiding the Resistance Front towards a formal and internationally and regionally acknowledged coalition is among the most important one. The paper also argues that Iranian Foreign Policy needs to make a practical balance between its support for the Front and advancing its relations with its neighbors and other internal and external actors in the Middle East based on the notion of common interests.

One of the issues raised today in the public opinion and the scientific community of the country is the questions and ambiguities regarding the relationship between the economic situation of the country and the role of the I.R.Iran in the resistance front. The main question in this article is about the impact of the role of the I.R.Iran in the axis of resistance on national interests from the perspective of political economy.In this article, as much as possible, we have tried to address all the political and economic components at both domestic and foreign levels, which are somehow related to explaining the position of the economy in the case of supporting the axis of resistance. It is obvious that running a country in a chaotic environment on the one hand and good governance to achieve maximum satisfaction of individuals on the other hand, has implications that logic dictates to look at all issues in a systematic way and avoiding comprehensive analytical reductionism in order to explain the position of the economy in the process of managing the resistance. The novelty of the article is that the issue of the country's economy and at the same time the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the axis of resistance has been studied in a field of internal and external components.

Trump's main goal of his foreign policy is to strengthen the power and influence of the United States in the global political scene through radical policies, to weaken the role of competitors such as Russia and China, to strengthen the alliance and cooperation with traditional allies in the regional scene such as Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime in order to reduce influence and Iran's power was assumed, and this shows the need to examine this issue to maintain Iran's power and security in the region as a Shia country. In the "Deal of the Century" plan, the basis for solving the Palestinian issue and the "two-state" plan was not, but the formation of " "Jewish national homeland" was discussed in the land of Palestine. In this article, after answering the question that c. A. What role has Iran played in Trump's approach to terrorism in the deal of the century? The proposed hypothesis is that Trump's approach in dealing with terrorism in the Deal of the Century plan was to deal with Iran and the resistance front in line with supporting Israel and other regional allies. Using the descriptive-analytical method, we came to the conclusion that the foreign policy of the United States regarding the deal of the century is based on a unilateral settlement approach and on the basis of protecting Israel's interests and confronting Iran and the resistance front.

The Islamic Republic of Iran as the main pillar of the resistance over the years has always been at the forefront of countering US domination and countering the aggression and expansionism of the Zionist regime and helping and oppressing the oppressed nations of the region. Assistance to members of the resistance axis has increased. Undoubtedly, a major part of the developments in the region has been influenced by the revolution and the policies of the holy system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In the meantime, the character of the Supreme Leader (Modzaleh Al-Aali) as the helmsman of the revolution and the leader and theorist and decision-maker of the system, is an irreplaceable role. At the same time, the issue of Islamic resistance as one of the characteristics and pillars of the Islamic Revolution in His Holiness's view is a doctrinal and Qur'anic view, meaning that resistance to the path of truth guarantees the fulfillment of divine promises and the victory of the Right Front over false armies. Therefore, considering the position of Velayat-e-Faqih in the Islamic Revolution and His Holiness's dominance over the issues of resistance, his role in strengthening and growing the defense-military strength of the Resistance Front is significant. The main purpose of this article is to explain the role of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces in leading the leadership of the Resistance Front, based on which measures to strengthen the defense and military strength of the Resistance Front will be led by governments, groups and movements. This research is of a applied type.This research is with a qualitative approach and since this article seeks to explain the role of the Supreme Leader (memory of God) in leading the leadership of the Resistance Front; Therefore, descriptive-explanatory (exploratory) method was used with foundation data analysis tool. Therefore, according to the true results, the strategies and consequences of the guidance and leadership of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces on the resistance front are as follows: 1- Strategies: endurance and perseverance, readiness and insight, creating a deterrent authority; 2. Consequences: The growth and development of the culture of resistance in the region, the development of self-reliance and the denial of imported security in the region

Among the movements that are trying nowadays to have an impressive effect in the Middle East developments, can refer to the Islamic Resistance Front . This movement has been effective in the context of Middle East and international system's political, social developments in the last few decades, meanwhile was able to be widely discussed with the inspiration and modeling of the Islamic Revolution discourse. Accordingly, the discourse of the Islamic Resistance Front has been able to develop a more serious confrontation in a growing power with the domination system through the support of Islamic Revolution of Iran, so that it can be said that this confrontation with the domination system in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Yemen has been led to a change in the challenges and the defeat of arrogant hegemony in the region. Considering the trend of global and regional developments after Islamic Revolution's victory and the spread of resistance act against the forces of anti-domineering, as well as the lack of available researches in this article has been tried to use Laclau and mouffe theory in an analytical-descriptive method and discourse analysis technique to response the question of how to explain the discourse of resistance and its consequences in the Middle East. The findings of this research indicate that the signs classified in the discourse of resistance can be classified into two categories. The first part is negative (negation) factors and the second one is affirmative (positivity) factors. The anti-dominance exists in the center of resistance discourse's negativity dimension, namely, negating domination and anti-dominance are the most important sign of negativity. But the most important affirmative forms of the resistance discourse, which are at the center of it, are some concepts like seeking justice, seeking rights, pacifism, dignity, authority, spiritualism and pragmatism.

The literature related to the review of military innovations are generally focused on describing the hard and technological aspects. This focus has caused the neglect of soft and managerial aspects in these areas. The Quds Force, which is responsible for the cross-border missions of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, has been able to contribute to the victory of the resistance front by focusing on managerial and advisory aspects during the period of Soleimani's command, much more than on hard and technological aspects.

This research was conducted with the method of reflective theme analysis. The implications were extracted from the specific target community, which is the statements published by the leaders of the resistance front or the leaders of the arrogant front on the subject of Soleimani's soft and managerial innovations.

General Soleimani's military, institutional and managerial innovations have been an effective factor in creating unity in the Middle East region. The establishment of dignity and position for the Shia authority as the guardian of Islamic religion and politics in Iraq and Lebanon was identified as his most fundamental institutional military innovation. Transferring the concept of mobilization to popularize war and reduce the risks caused by the lack of motivation in statesmen are among the other innovations mentioned. Finally, it became clear that creating a coalition to take advantage of the power of non-Muslims, against the arrogance front, is one of the most important and effective military innovations of Lieutenant General Soleimani's management in recent years.

Since the beginning, Islamic Republic of Iran, according to its essential ideological principles and with the sanctioned support of its Constitution, has always sought material and spiritual aid to Islamic resistance and liberation movements; and has consequently incurred many costs in this direction. The successes of the Lebanese Islamic Resistance against the Zionist regime, the formation of a popular mobilization in Iraq to confront the terrorist group ISIS, the intellectual and political growth of the West Asian nations in recent years; regional demands tied to ideals such as independence, justice, and Islamism; dealing with interventionist powers; as well as the rise of the Islamic awakening of the oppressed people in countries such as Bahrain, Yemen, Palestine, Syria, etc.; have all provided a critical opportunity to throughly analyze the emergence of the resistance front and its reasons.This study discusses intellectual foundations in the field of foreign policy, and examines the components of this front, from the perspective of strategic foresight and its related tools. By employing strategic foresight methods, through environmental scanning, the phenomena and issues related to emergence of the resistance front have been identified, and priorities of these issues have been categorized. Finally, by utilizing cross impact analysis method and MicMac software, key factors and their direct and indirect effects of assessment are evaluated. Hence, the most important issues related to the emergence of the resistance axis are investigated.

The media as a tool for Crisis building and de-crisis, enlightenment, creating a space for a healthy and constructive approach to views and appropriate information, is one of the most important factors of progress and a sign of dynamism and mobility of society in today's world. In today 's world, the media forms a large part of the nature of public opinion, and this trend is increasing. Our main question in this research is the cultural, social and political role of the media of the Resistance Front in managing the public opinion of the Syrian crisis. The method used in this research is descriptive and analytical. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through formal method and content validity and the validity of the items was checked and confirmed through Cronbach's alpha (0.990). The statistical population of this study includes managers and experts related to the field of resistance media and the study sample that was purposefully selected included 43 managers and experts related to the field of media in Syria who also had sufficient information about this research and They have also been willing to cooperate. The research findings indicate that the cultural impact of the media, including mentality, culture, social impact, including hope, unity and political impact, including crisis resolution and enlightenment, have an effective role in managing public opinion.

In today's world, we face a phenomenon called media; A media that has a very high power and deep influence in the public opinion of all societies and countries. The media as a tool for enlightenment, creating a space for a healthy and constructive approach to views and appropriate information, is one of the most important factors of progress and one of the signs of dynamism and mobility of society in today's world. The main concern of the present study is The political-security role of the media of the Resistance Front in managing the public opinion of the Syrian crisis. The present study is a descriptive survey; Data collection tool in this study was a researcher-made questionnaire, its validity was confirmed by face method and content validity and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.993). The statistical population of this study includes officials and experts related to the media of the resistance movement and the study sample that was purposefully selected included 30 officials and experts related to the field of media in Syria who had sufficient information about this study and The findings of the study indicate that the political-security roles of the media, such as crisis resolution, awareness and enlightenment, political development of society, etc. have an effective role in managing public opinion.

By formation of the resistant front in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, and by developing strategic depth of Islamic Revolution, reciprocal actions of enemies have engulfed mentioned countries as well. One of those actions is enjoying the Sunni Muslim’s potentials with Salafi and Vahhabi approach. The topic states that I.R of Iran must take care until not being faced with surprised failure not only in its territory but also in the resistant country. In this article the researchers are following to answer the main question as: Has I.R of Iran been faced with surprised failure in Iraq and collapse of Mosul? If yes, the following subordinate questions are being answered: 1- What where the reasons of Iran’s surprised failure in collapse of Mosul? 2- What are the preventive ways of military-security surprised failure by approach, structural and methodical in the future? The following research has been raised as developing and practical and by merging qualitative and quantitative inputs, as well as 3 open-ended questionnaires and mixed method has been used. The time territory is from resuming Islamic Revolution. To answer the questions, by studying upstream/high level documents, expert interviews and comparison studies 9 components and 60 attributes from surprised failure field have been discovered. By arranging expert meeting and 3 questionnaires all the ideas have received, so that we found the essence of the failure in Mosul was ignorance and treason. Reasons and factors of surprised failure have been studied and analyzed by AHP method. Finally, weaknesses and reasons of surprised failure have structural, methodical and logical approach as course of actions.

Yemen has always been strategically important in West Asia. Helping and protecting the oppressed nations has always been a priority for Iran since the Islamic Revolution, and Yemen has now been under Saudi-US coalition's invasions for years. Yemen crisis goes to show the fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran must finds its strategic role in the region in order to support the resistance front in Yemen; Iran must try to both understand the current status in order not to be surprised and take initiatives to build the future. The present article aims at answering this question: what is the Islamic Republic of Iran's role in helping and supporting Yemenis? This research is a descriptive-analytical study using library means, interviews and expert panels. First, the documents were reviewed and experts were interviewed and a list of the roles of the Islamic Republic of Iran in supporting Yemenis was made. Next, an expert panel was held with eight of the important scholars. Then, the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran in supporting the Yemenis was put in the following categories: political, humanitarian, media, scientific- cultural, legal, cultural-religious and economic. In the end, the challenges and proposals are put forward.

After the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Islamic resistance by using the thought system of Imam Khomeini and Imam Khamenee, has led to formation of the Resistance Front in the west Asian with the Axis of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Resistance Front, In order to achieve it's goals as well as to align the nation and governments of region with the islamic revolution, needs a coherent and afficient pattern, so it can be used to manage it's enviromental complexities. Imam Khamenee, as the leader of islamic revolution and Supreme Commander of Armed Forces, with his intelligence mastery on the resistance front, has explained the various dimensions of the resistance on various occasions and speeches. Therefor, the main purpose of this research is to achieve a resistance pattern from Imam Khamenei's pont of view. This reserch is an applied and mixed approach. It also has been done qualitatively and quantitatively in the library method with using content analysis and foundation-data theorizing methods.  According to the supreme leader's thought system, the Resistance Front in dimensions and components: Pillars(Leaders, Governments, Nations, Unity,...), Fundamentals and Directions maker(Goals, Thoughts, School, Principles,...), Driving factors(Defensive Readiness and Strength,  Interal Construction Strength,...) and Obstacles and Challenges(Influence, Hypocrisy, Interal Disorder, Despotism, Arrogance,...), Resistance goals(Government building, Leadership building,...), achieving independence and glory of governments and nations of Resistance Front, building trust, deterrence and reduction of arrogant military presence in the Axis of resistance countries and ultimately facilitate the victory of the resistance.