جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « public order » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

In communal property, one of the partners may illegally and without permission encroach on the share of other owners and take it over. In this case, each of the owners alone can request the eviction of the occupier from the court by proving that the occupation is illegal and without permission, which is usually done in the form of two lawsuits, eviction and eviction. In the case of expropriation of joint property, the property is not transferred to the convict after expropriation, because in joint property, all the owners have joint ownership, except for the property, and the order to dispose of and seize one of the owners, whether he wants it or not, causes It will be usurping the rights of other partners, which is against the legal and Shariah standards. This problem has caused some lawyers, assuming that the lawsuit is not enforceable, basically consider such a lawsuit unhearable and reject the lawsuit by ordering no hearing. In this article, by examining the judicial opinions and explaining the legal arguments cited by judges and jurists regarding the admissibility or inadmissibility of a court case, we will prove that the non-enforceability of a decision is not related to its ability to be heard, and the court case is similar to Other definitively unenforceable claims will be subject to hearing. Then, we will explain the differences and their unique effects by comparing the lawsuits of disposing of and putting on with each other.

Freedom of access to information is generally recognized under the title of freedom of expression as one of the basic human rights in many global and regional human rights documents. Despite this, respect for the principle of national sovereignty of states requires that restrictions be set on the way of this freedom in the legal frameworks such as maintaining order and public morality. The Islamic Republic of Iran faces two basic obstacles in terms of freedom of access to information; On the one hand, under the pretext of imposing restrictions on objectionable media contents (either immoral or subversive) and violation of freedom of expression, it is attacked by human rights institutions, and on the other hand, its overseas networks such as Press TV with accusations such as "publication of baseless evidence" are banned or limited. Now the question is, what is the concept and interpretation of "public order and ethics" in international law and how can the Islamic Republic of Iran, while answering and defending itself legally in international forums, demand the free publication of its media information? The present research has tried to answer the above questions through the analytical-descriptive method and citing library documents. The results of the investigations show that the concept of order and public morality should be interpreted in the framework of the relativistic approach and in accordance with the customary culture of the countries in order to avoid contradictory standards and procedures in the international law system.

Islam welcomes anything that dissuades a man from divorce, so the legislator has tried to pay special attention to the compromise between couples and the preservation of Have a family foundation; In the meantime, formal regulations governing the proceedings and the execution of court rulings are important. The purpose of this study is to investigate the limitations of divorce in the Family Protection Law with emphasis on public order.

This descriptive and inferential study has examined the domestic laws related to family protection, especially the law adopted in 1391, with emphasis on public order.

The study showed that although cases such as the presence of a female counselor judge, referral to counsel and referral to arbitration are some of the positive aspects of this law and not only a factor in strengthening the family but also the foundation of public order. In contrast, the lack of need to refer to an arbitrator in a consensual divorce and excessive protection of the wife's financial rights does not necessarily mean the strengthening of the family and is one of the criticizable aspects of the law.

According to the principle of the necessity of criminal prosecution, upon the occurrence of a crime, the prosecutor, as the prosecuting authority, is obliged to prosecute the accused; but over time, society and public opinion have reduced their sensitivity to certain crimes and are reluctant to be prosecuted by the prosecutor. This can be due to the nature of some crimes, which, in principle, do not disturb the social order and security, or in the event of damage, the negative consequences of prosecuting crimes from the community point of view are far greater than prosecuting them. This situation compels the prosecutor to abandon the prosecution in the light of the principle of appropriateness or appropriateness of the criminal prosecution and to use the alternatives of the prosecution, such as the suspension of the prosecution, the filing of the case and criminal mediation; Because criminal law is a tool to achieve the goals of social policy, and consequently, social acceptability is the legitimacy of prosecution. In this case, the pursuit is expedient. In this article, we seek to examine how the prosecutor achieves public order and social security with expediency.

The present research is a research article and the result of the author's studies and researches in the form of library documents. And after reviewing the contents related to the title of the article and the necessary filings, it has been compiled and arranged.

The findings of the study indicate that in the light of the expediency of the prosecutor and by observing the conditions, both the interests of individuals and the interests of society are provided. By preparing public opinion as well as regulating the pursuit of expediency, one can hope for the effective establishment of public order and social security. The objectives of the investigation are to examine the expediency of the prosecuting authority in relation to the establishment of public order and social security at the community level and to answer these questions. What is the relationship between the prosecutor's expediency in dealing with crimes in maintaining public order and social security? And finally, what is the authority of the prosecutor in assessing the expediency of criminal prosecution in relation to the establishment of public order and social security?

The main message of this research is how the prosecutor achieves public order and social security with expediency. The prosecuting authority does not make the prosecution commensurate with the mere consideration of an interest or benefit. Rather, in order to convince himself and justify the judicial action, by evaluating the values ​​emphasized by the society, in some cases, it is possible to consider several benefits or interests of the victim / offender and the interests of the society separately or together; Then refrain from pursuing the accused; And may use other measures as an alternative to prosecution.

In all legal systems, the police have the task of establishing a public-centered order, and the establishment of public order requires the exercise of special powers and the enjoyment of the law. However, public order in the new sense, and, of course, based on Islamic teachings, is not unilateral, and must be bound by specific requirements and through social participation and a commitment to a common destiny based on the Ninth Principle of the Constitution and in cooperation with the general public. The partnership also builds on the sense of participation and trust in the police as trustees of the public security domain. In this article, in response to the question, “What are the legal bases and mechanisms for the realization of a strong and trustworthy police?” We are designing the legal pattern of “a strong police, trustworthy people” so that the police can perform their legal duties in establishing order and order. Public security is well-functioning and, of course, we consider that it requires that the police provide objective guarantees to the public that the police are committed to the law and in the public interest, tolerant and tasteful. It is non-discriminatory, operates under the supervision and guidance of judicial authorities, and does not violate the legitimate rights and freedoms of the people. As such, the police have sought to establish citizen centered and social security that treats citizens on the basis of professional ethics and disrupts public order in a law-abiding manner.

There are controversial ideas and approaches about the state intervention in family institution. One of these approaches believes that the family institution is excluded to private law and interference in family institution by state is not permissible. In contrast, the other approach assumes that the family has a dual nature (both private and public). Thus, it permits the state intervention in public nature of the family. Considering this latter approach, the scope and scale of state interference in family institution is different based on the variations of the legal systems’ basics. This research tries to answer this question: “what are the basics for state intervention in the family institution in the Iranian legal system” based on Descriptive-analytical method. In response, jurisprudential basis of state intervention in family institution such as public interests, system protection and legal requirements like public order and the principle of proportionality has been investigated. According to desired intervention theory – which focus on the least intervention and most protection of the family by state- the state intervention in the family institution is legitimate in Iranian legal system.

Tehran police commander in recent years embarked on the implementation of social discipline in some areas of Tehran, including Tehran's District 3. While some critics have questioned the effectiveness of the implementation of the project and also the effectiveness of the plan and satisfaction of the people, the implementation of the scheme, it is important for policy making and implementation plan, Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effectiveness of social discipline and the relationship implementation to the satisfaction of the people has been done. present study is quantitative data and has done for practical purposes and in view of the nature, is correlational study. The study sample consisted of 240,000 thousand residents of District 3 of Tehran's population are over 18 years and by using a formula to determine the sample size, 165 participants were selected from the whole of the population. Measurement tool developed by the researchers of this study will form questionnaire with 28 questions. Credit tool calculated by Cronbach's alpha of 83 /. And its validity was confirmed by content validity. The present data by one-sample t test and Spearman's correlation analyzed in spss software package is located. Findings and The results showed that in terms of sample population, implementation social discipline in the three dimensions of aspects of the traffic, security and social order and people also has the necessary effectiveness of the implementation consent. Thus,, extension implementation with the strengths and eliminate weaknesses and taking into account suggestions and criticisms by the respondents, cited the comments in response to a confirmed it is possible.

Abstract
Transient communities normally face various conflicts in their economic, political, cultural and social infrastructures due to numerous changes. Lack of conformity in accompany with inconsistent growth of secular and non-secular elements of culture in these communities, leads to impediments and problems in their social compliance which effectively contribute to order and public and social security domain. The present survey has been conducted to achieve an accurate and correct cognition of social issues through using descriptive- exploration method. Therefore, after studying theoretical tenets, a questionnaire comprised of 25 items was designed and credited. The questionnaire's apparent and content validity was approved by 15 well-versed experts, and its reliability was approved through using Cronbach's alpha (93%).

The present paper tries to answer the following question by investigating the conceptualization of citizen security; can the concept of citizen security help the reconstruction of security in developing countries? By raising this question, after the issue’s conceptualization using descriptive-analytic method, this fact has been examined that how the concept of citizen security would lead to the violence in developing countries and affects the citizen performance from the governments? The formulated hypothesis is that the functions of citizen security concept can help the functional and conceptual reconstruction and social security of developing countries. The findings indicate that citizen security can help create a correct image of the reasons behind social conflicts through evaluating the environmental hazards. In addition, Islam has the required instructions for designing the security theory appropriate with this time and age in all dimensions. The security that Islam claims is not arbitrary and police security. The Islamic views believe in the superiority of wisdoms and ideals such as justice and freedom in security.

This study aims at explaining the relationship between the indicators of police ethical chart and the order and security of community. This study is of a survey type and it has been conducted in cross-correlational method and the most important indicators of police ethical chart and ensuring the order and security of community were analyzed using Pearson correlation test. The sample population is all of the I.R.I Police administrative staff. Random sampling was done using Morgan table and the number of statistical samples are 150 members. The data collection instrument was a 40-item questionnaire that was measured on the range of Likert measurement. The findings showed that there is a negative correlation between crimes and job violations of I.R.I Police staffs and providing order and security in community; this means that by increasing the number of crimes and police job violations, the community’s order and security is reduced. There is a positive relationship between the rule of law, police accountability, planning and appropriate management of I.R.I Police authorities, personnel occupational health, confidentiality, respect for citizens’ rights, conscientious, police service and providing the order and security in community. It means that by reinforcing these principles in police personnel, the community’s order and security can be promoted and ensured.